Dog Based Gremlin
Veteran
I need a link 

LOL you just noticed that about this site? a whole bunch of hypocrisy runs rampant on here, the same nikkas offended call RG3 a c00n themselves..
Well there are a lot of whites that disguise themselves as black on this forum.
This thread is the truth. Everyone knows how much I love to go on a c00n hunt and calling them out. so it's would be hypocritical of me to get offended by Rob Parker's comments, even though he's one of the dumbest nikkas on tv.
This whole discussion reeks of attention-seeking, and repeating it does me no credit. Quite the opposite. But I have a history of transcribing controversial things said about D.C. athletes, so here ya go.
Robert Griffin III has been asked about his race repeatedly this season. He has not, to my knowledge, ever brought the subject up himself. Every time he’s been asked about it, he has managed to appear thoughtful and considerate without possibly offending anyone.
I’m not sure he’s ever handled the race question better than on last week’s Comcast SportsNet special, when Chick Hernandez talked about being a black quarterback in D.C.
“Whenever you can relate to the population of the team that you play for, I think it makes it that much more special,” Griffin said. “I don’t play too much into the color game, because I don’t want to be the best African American quarterback, I want to be the best quarterback.
“But to the fans, and to the fans who think that way and look at me as an African American, it’s important that I succeed, not only for this team, but for them,” he continued. “Because it gives them that motivation, that hey, you know, an African American went out and played quarterback for my Washington Redskins. So I appreciate that; I don’t ever downplay anything like that. Whoever I can go out every week and motivate to do better and to try to go after their dreams, I’m up for that.”
Again, I don’t know how he could possibly have handled that issue — which he did not raise himself — any better.
But people keep asking. The rookie was asked about race yet again on Wednesday, this time by an ESPN reporter. He delivered a similar answer. It was an answer that showed he’s actually thought about the issue, but it was steadfastly non-controversial.
“I am [aware] of how race is relevant to [some fans]. I don’t ignore it,” Griffin said Wednesday. “I try not to be defined by it, but I understand different perspectives and how people view different things. So I understand they’re excited their quarterback is an African American. I play with a lot of pride, a lot of character, a lot of heart. So I understand that, and I appreciate them for being fans.”
Well. This led to a Thursday discussion on First Take, ESPN’s abysmal debate program. Panelist Rob Parker was asked, ‘What does this say about RGIII?”
“This is an interesting topic,” Parker said. “For me, personally, just me, this throws up a red flag, what I keep hearing. And I don’t know who’s asking the questions, but we’ve heard a couple of times now of a black guy kind of distancing himself away from black people.
“I understand the whole story of I just want to be the best,” Parker continued. “Nobody’s out on the field saying to themselves, I want to be the best black quarterback. You’re just playing football, right? You want to be the best, you want to throw the most touchdowns and have the most yards and win the most games. Nobody is [thinking] that.
“But time and time we keep hearing this, so it just makes me wonder deeper about him,” Parker went on. “And I’ve talked to some people down in Washington D.C., friends of mine, who are around and at some of the press conferences, people I’ve known for a long time. But my question, which is just a straight honest question. Is he a brother, or is he a cornball brother?”
What does that mean, Parker was asked.
“Well, [that] he’s black, he kind of does his thing, but he’s not really down with the cause, he’s not one of us,” Parker explained. “He’s kind of black, but he’s not really the guy you’d really want to hang out with, because he’s off to do something else.”
Why is that your question, Parker was asked.
“Well, because I want to find out about him,” Parker said. “I don’t know, because I keep hearing these things. We all know he has a white fiancée. There was all this talk about he’s a Republican, which, there’s no information [about that] at all. I’m just trying to dig deeper as to why he has an issue. Because we did find out with Tiger Woods, Tiger Woods was like I’ve got black skin but don’t call me black. So people got to wondering about Tiger Woods early on.”
Then Skip Bayless asked Parker about RGIII’s braids.
“Now that’s different,” Parker said. “To me, that’s very urban and makes you feel like…wearing braids, you’re a brother. You’re a brother if you’ve got braids on.”
Then Stephen A. Smith was asked for his take. He exhaled deeply.
“Well first of all let me say this: I’m uncomfortable with where we just went,” Smith said. “RGIII, the ethnicity, the color of his fiancée is none of our business. It’s irrelevant. He can live his life any way he chooses. The braids that he has in his hair, that’s his business, that’s his life. I don’t judge someone’s blackness based on those kind of things. I just don’t do that. I’m not that kind of guy.
“What I would say to you is that the comments he made are fairly predictable,” Smith went on. “I think it’s something that he may feel, but it’s also a concerted effort to appease the masses to some degree, which I’m finding relatively irritating, because I don’t believe that the black athlete has any responsibility whatsoever to have to do such things.
“Let me say this clearly. I don’t know of anybody who goes into something trying to be the best black anything. We understand that. That’s a given,” Smith said. “But I do think it’s important to acknowledge a level of pride and a feeling of a level of accomplishment for being somebody who happens to be of African American descent, who competes and achieves and accomplishes things on the highest level while also bringing attention – to some degree anyhow – to the pride that they feel being black. Because they’re allowing themselves to be a reminder to those who preceded them, who worked so hard, accomplished and achieved so much, but were denied the accolades that that individual is receiving.”
Later, Parker was given an opportunity to clarify whether he was judging Griffin’s blackness.
“I didn’t mean it like that,” he said. “We could sit here and be honest, or we can be dishonest. And you can’t tell me that people in the barbershops or people that talk, they look at who your spouse is. They do. And they look at how you present yourself. People will say all the time, you’re not gonna get a job in corporate America wearing those braids. It happens all the time. Let’s not act like it doesn’t, because it does.”
The only conclusion I’m willing to make about all of this is that the show would have been much more thoughtful had Griffin been on the panel. Or had he replaced the panel.
(Watch the video here.)
Hit dogs gonna holler...
I'm not naive at all nor did I expect anything to change. I've been on sohh/coli since about 05. I'm just pointing out how fraudulent people here are. It speaks volumes about a few posters in this thread that clearly have no problem with throwing racial slurs around. You look like a fool trying to hold someone else to standards when you clearly have none of your own.
If your feelings weren't so hurt you probably would be able to read better...probably. Everything about your posts from your username on down is pitiful. I'm embarrassed for you.
I take issue with you somehow expecting ESPN to adhere to journalistic code all of a sudden. ESPN gave up responsible journalism years ago. Look at Chris Broussard. They dont even make their journalist reveal their sources, and Im beginning to think there is no source verification process in place. ESPN is the last place you go to for responsible journalism. And First Take doesnt even advertise itself as responsible journalism. Its opinionated debate.You make some points. Some people do adhere to situational decency and deeper issues usually are at play for a lot of people and ESPN does thrive off attention. However I must take issue with the comparison between random nikkas on a message board and Rob Parker or any other journalist/pundit. The expectations for a member of the media are not the same as the expectations for a nikka in his mom's basement or stealing time on his work/school computer. Rob Parker is a professional and therefore is expected to adhere to the standards of being a professional. Calling a man out for being a "cornball" and having white wife is something you would expect and accept from a comedian or your average nikka on the street but an "esteemed and respected journalist" not so much.
BTW- Since we are crusading against ignorance can we get rid of "Uncle Tom" being used as a pejorative?
I take issue with you somehow expecting ESPN to adhere to journalistic code all of a sudden. ESPN gave up responsible journalism years ago. Look at Chris Broussard. They dont even make their journalist reveal their sources, and Im beginning to think there is no source verification process in place. ESPN is the last place you go to for responsible journalism. And First Take doesnt even advertise itself as responsible journalism. Its opinionated debate.