If The Earth Is Flat Then What Shapes Are The Other Planets?

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I already showed the math that factually proves that the earth is stationary as the sun rotates above us, in this very thread. That math disproves heliocentric theory in its entirety

No, you have posted nonsense masquerading as math that shows how woefully incompetent, ignorant, and logically invalid your entire argument is. You can't disprove the heliocentric theory with math because you don't understand the heliocentric theory OR math. The Sun does not rotate above us, the Earth rotates on it's axis while the Sun remains stationary in-relation to it while, itself, rotating/orbiting along the galaxy's axis. Proof of this is the Analemma, a phenomenon which could ONLY occur if the Earth were rotating.....

Now, if you wish to stick to your 'The Sun rotates above the Earth' argument, you'd have to present some explanation as to how the Sun moves in this objectively observable manner......which would debunk every other argument you may put forward.

​

 

[KodeBlue]

Did you mean to post those numbers like that?

Yea. You asked a fairly vague question, and my initial answer wasn't what you were asking, so i gave the opposite answer; its one or the other. I don't understand how this correlates earth being flat, however.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Again, i literally just showed you that sidereal days cannot and do not exist based on the suns motion

Im not mixing up anything at all, hence why yall are scrolling past that post like it never existed

You ARE mixing up terms because you, yourself, don't comprehend them fully. A sidereal day is one Earth rotation in relation to the stars/constellations.

A solar day is one Earth rotation in relation to Sol.

We use sidereal days to track celestial bodies.

We use solar days to track time on Earth.

You are wrong and your argument is null and void.

​

 

[xCivicx]

Yea. You asked a fairly vague question, and my initial answer wasn't what you were asking, so i gave the opposite answer; its one or the other. I don't understand how this correlates earth being flat, however.

But the number you posted doesnt make sense...

 

[xCivicx]

If you really wanna blow minds

Yet the constellations look the exact same every year

Yeah ok

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

But one simple proof has to do with the coriolis effect



Which, according to heliocentric theory, states that once an object is no longer on the earths surface, its not moving at the same rate as the earth

This means that an eastward moving plane would have to fly at 1000 mph IN ADDITION to its cruise speed to actually move anywhere, because if its flying at less than the 1000mph that the earth is rotating at, its destination will constantly be rotating aeay from it

This also means that MOST westward flights would be MUCH faster than eastward flights

But if course, we dont observe this at all, and we even tracked multiple flights going east/west and west/east in that previous thread and they proved my point

Im just applying simple logic

You are wrong on so many levels it's amazing you can find your way home from the nursery school you attend without an escort. Anyhow, the heliocentric model doesn't state that once an object is no longer on the surface it isn't moving at the same rate as Earth because of the effect.

The Coriolis Effect, according to the Heliocentric Model, is a force caused by the Earth's rotation which causes air to deflect to the right in the Northern Hemisphere, and the left in the Southern, which causes curved pathways that influence weather patterns. The Effect was named after French mathematician Gaspard Gustave de Coriolis who studied these patterns back in the 19th Century.

You are NOT applying 'simple logic' at all, but are advertising your ignorance

​

 

[Ironman]

I hate you motherfukkers

 

[skeetsinternal]

I believe that was @skeetsinternal

This a lie. 2020 keep my name out yall mouth

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

No we arent because once again, if we were then clouds wouldnt be able to move freely in all directions

We'd see the same clouds above the exact same locations for our entire lives

And again, the coriolis effect literally says that we arent, and the people who created that term are not flat earthers, theyre people on your side of the discussion

The Coriolis Effect actually proves the globe. The Flat Earth has NO way to account for it, test it, or make predictions for objectively observable phenomena that doesn't contradict or outright invalidate any other Flat Earth claim to 'reality'.

There is NO Flat Earth model because it's a fantasy easily refuted by evidence, logic, reason, math, and the proper application of the scientific method.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I don't think there's anyway to change the other side's minds in these debates.

I wonder if any flat earth engineers ever put a camera on a rocket so we can have visual proof of their claims. Any wealthy flat earthers out there that can fund this?

Every time they actually try to use science correctly, they prove the globe......





'Interesting'............​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Now you know why this cat has me on 'Ignore'.

I'll destroy his entire worldview and make him look like Anthony Riley.....​

​

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

You already know that we had an entire thread on planes and flight paths where i most definitely proved that they are not possible on a ball spinning at 1000mph

Feel free to reup that thread though

Are you ever going to post an accurate map of this flat Earth? Or just continue spewing nonsense where you misinterpret little pieces of science and run with it?

 

[KodeBlue]

But the number you posted doesnt make sense...

The question you asked didn't make sense, and honestly, quite irrelevant.

But you asked, so i gave you every answer possible. One of those answers will have had to sufficiently answer your question.

 

[ba'al]

Are you ever going to post an accurate map of this flat Earth?

 

[PharaohAtem]

I believe that was @skeetsinternal

This a lie. 2020 keep my name out yall mouth