If republicans believe US elections are fraudulent

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
45,983
Reputation
3,894
Daps
69,577
Reppin
Michigan
They back her with what? Words? That's not good enough for me where is the proof and now her lawyer and the source of info she paid for are getting indicted for lying to the government. She was a former Secretary of State when she did that.
She was not the sitting president of the US saying US elections are fraudulent and the country is being stolen from my party and supporters.

Again I ask:
In what other civilized industrial country does the head of state come out and say our election process is untrustworthy because it might not go the way he wants? What other head of state tries to undermine his nation's process for selecting government?

Lastly if you want proof the congressional and Mueller reports exist.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,914
Reputation
3,046
Daps
70,375
Reppin
New York
This guy really in here trying to both sides this shyt.:mjlol:

Jump in the fray if you feeling a certain way. :francis:

She was not the sitting president of the US saying US elections are fraudulent and the country is being stolen from my party and supporters.

Again I ask:
In what other civilized industrial country does the head of state come out and say our election process is untrustworthy because it might not go the way he wants? What other head of state tries to undermine his nation's process for selecting government?

Lastly if you want proof the congressional and Mueller reports exist.
Why does it only count when you are a sitting US president? You are moving the goal posts, that condition is nowhere in the title or your initial post. You were talking about the Republicans generally. Why can't I mention Dems generally?
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
45,983
Reputation
3,894
Daps
69,577
Reppin
Michigan
Jump in the fray if you feeling a certain way. :francis:


Why does it only count when you are a sitting US president? You are moving the goal posts, that condition is nowhere in the title or your initial post. You were talking about the Republicans generally. Why can't I mention Dems generally?
I asked a specific question and you gave an answer that didn't apply. Again my question was
In what other civilized industrial country does the head of state come out and say our election process is untrustworthy because it might not go the way he wants? What other head of state tries to undermine his nation's process for selecting government?
You answered Clinton when she in fact was never a sitting US president.

When a sitting US president says our elections are fraudulent do you not see how that doesn't carry the same weight as a private citizen saying it?

Beyond that Clinton saying Russia interfered in the 2016 election something that has been proven as factual is entirely different than a sitting US president saying the US election process itself especially in select areas is untrustworthy by nature.

One person is saying a foreign power attempted to influence our elections and the other is saying "the only way I lose this election is if they steal it."

The person saying the latter has a history of saying they won't concede an election they lose. He did that in his own party primaries. The fact of the matter is this person was never going to concede an election they lost to begin with. Hillary Clinton conceded the 2016 election. Trump still to this day hasn't conceded the 2020 election. This is the same man that called the secretary of state on Georgia on a recorded phone call we've heard and told him to find enough votes to overturn the results.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,914
Reputation
3,046
Daps
70,375
Reppin
New York
I asked a specific question and you gave an answer that didn't apply. Again my question was

You answered Clinton when she in fact was never a sitting US president.

When a sitting US president says our elections are fraudulent do you not see how that doesn't carry the same weight as a private citizen saying it?

Beyond that Clinton saying Russia interfered in the 2016 election something that has been proven as factual is entirely different than a sitting US president saying the US election process itself especially in select areas is untrustworthy by nature.

One person is saying a foreign power attempted to influence our elections and the other is saying "the only way I lose this election is if they steal it."

The person saying the latter has a history of saying they won't concede an election they lose. He did that in his own party primaries. The fact of the matter is this person was never going to concede an election they lost to begin with. Hillary Clinton conceded the 2016 election. Trump still to this day hasn't conceded the 2020 election. This is the same man that called the secretary of state on Georgia on a recorded phone call we've heard and told him to find enough votes to overturn the results.
Ok, yes she was not president but a former first lady and Secretary of State is way closer to being as influential as a former president that she is to your avg. American citizen.
 
Top