It can work. If houses were affordable everyone could have a nice house. If I could buy a 80 year old house for $10 grand and fix it up, it be nice. Instead an 80 year old house that was valued at 20,000 80 years ago is now worth 300,000 with no up keep
10K?that might be a little too cheap
But I guess if you think about it,at a certain point in depreciation it would make no sense to sell it. Unless you cant afford any kind of repairs some how. It would make more sense to keep it as secondary income to rent out.
Makes more sense to have people whove paid for their home. Then saved up to buy another home be the ones renting out homes to people. Its more of a natural progression than having 24 year olds buying homes and renting them out for AirBNB driving cost up.
Youd have people who already paid off a home by 35-40. Saved up to buy another by 45-50. Renting out a home to first time renters. This would probably even take some weight off social security. One flaw I see is I dont know what the incentive would be to rent vs rent to own
Might have to put an age limit on who can rent to own. Lets say maybe 25 and up,gotta show a good rental history first.