If Bernie doesn't get the nod how are you voting (POLL)

How are you voting if Bernie isn't on the Ticket

  • I've been a Hillary Stan since jump

    Votes: 28 14.1%
  • Trump/Rethug

    Votes: 41 20.6%
  • Other - 3rd Party

    Votes: 35 17.6%
  • Not voting

    Votes: 51 25.6%
  • Moving

    Votes: 7 3.5%
  • Hold my nose and vote for the pants suit (happy acri)

    Votes: 37 18.6%

  • Total voters
    199

SirReginald

The African Diaspora Will Be "ONE" (#PanAfricana)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
51,731
Reputation
251
Daps
79,372
Reppin
Pan Africanism
The deck was stacked only in the sense that he was going against a political juggernaut while being a relatively unknown democratic socialist. So yeah, it was a going to be an uphill battle, just like it was for Obama. But that doesn't mean it was impossible for him to win. He was probably one major Hillary gaffe away from winning this thing.



I'm confused. What is it about Trump's foreign policy & trade policy that differs from Clinton and would take longer for ordinary people to recover?



Seems to me this would make little difference. Clinton would still be up 1947 to 1575 in total delegates, and probably still get the nomination. Sanders would need to win 2/3s of the remaining delegates in this scenario ... not very likely to happen.
Look it up I'm tired of saying the same thing. Never would I vote for Clinton and I explained the policy differences numerous of times.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
18,974
Reputation
4,538
Daps
81,156
Reppin
The Arsenal
Both insure exactly what I stated.

That Roe v. Wade gets upheld and that immigration reform gets passed.





Got anything to say?
but no proof of it, just your feelings. and we don't even know what this potential case that would be brought to the supreme court would even look like.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
1,392
Reputation
225
Daps
2,329
but no proof of it, just your feelings. and we don't even know what this potential case that would be brought to the supreme court would even look like.

Then why care about who gets the supreme court nod?

You don't know what they will do either.

Why then should anyone rush to the polls to pick a President who gets to vote for a new Justice if there's no way of knowing how they'll vote anyway.
 

SirReginald

The African Diaspora Will Be "ONE" (#PanAfricana)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
51,731
Reputation
251
Daps
79,372
Reppin
Pan Africanism
Yeah, but you don't think they would have changed if the people began supporting Sanders? Wasn't that precisely what happened in 2008?
Obama was one of them :heh: Four years earlier he was a speaker at the DNC Convention. Not bashing Obama, I'm just telling you that he was an establishment candidate. Bernie is an outsider that had to run as a Democrat for name recognition. Superdelegates are there, so they can rig it for their candidate.
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,385
Reputation
255
Daps
6,108
Look it up I'm tired of saying the same thing. Never would I vote for Clinton and I explained the policy differences numerous of times.

Well I don't follow you around threads, so.

As to your other point, Obama might have been more to the right than Sanders, but he was still fighting uphill to combat the political strength and name recognition of Clinton. The superdelegates overwhelmingly supported Clinton until she started making bald faced lies like the Bosnia trip, and people called her out for it. We had very similar results in the actual elections up until then too.
 
Last edited:

SirReginald

The African Diaspora Will Be "ONE" (#PanAfricana)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2014
Messages
51,731
Reputation
251
Daps
79,372
Reppin
Pan Africanism
Well I don't follow you around threads, so.

As to your other point, Obama might have been more to the right than Sanders, but he was still fighting uphill to combat the political strength and name recognition of Clinton. The superdelegates overwhelmingly supported Clinton until she started making bald faced lies like the Bosnia trip, and people called her out for it. We had very similar results in the actual elections up until then too.
The point was that the election was between two establishment candidates. Also, Dennis Kucinich was ousted he was 08's Bernie. The guy was for gay marriage and etc. It was originally suppose to come down to O'Malley (Your establishment candidate) and Clinton, but the people loved Bernie because of his platform.

Things I agree with Trump on: His stance against TPP and Fair Trade. To do that BOTH sides have to be equal. It cannot be a one sided agreement.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
51,626
Reputation
18,782
Daps
281,273
We said that in 2008. The fact is, politics is local. That image only hurts nationally. Locally, you're good. Besides, all you have to do is disavow Trump. Most of them have already.

It was perceived policy weaknesses (soft on crime) and backlash to the civil rights movement that hurt Dems before Clinton at the presidential level. But they still held Congress throughout that time. And under Clinton they (Rs) held Congress despite his popularity. Republicana are not going anywhere. If Mitt Romney was their candidate this year, Hillary would lose. They come back in 2020 with a "moderate" that their base likes. National party favorables mean nothing.

It was true in 2008 as well, the difference is that republicans had a clear path to saving themselves. Instead they took the exact opposite path - anti immigration and anti Hispanic in many respects. Note I'm not talking about congress; republicans continue to have advantages in districts throughout the country and that won't immediately change, even after the 2020 census. But nationally the party as it currently stands doesn't have a path to 270 without outside factors such as an economic implosion or scandal.

It's nigh impossible to be elected president without winning nearly 43% of the Hispanic vote. Romney was at 27%, Trump will likely get 20%. A Trump nomination is very likely to ruin the party with Hispanics for the foreseeable future.

Just as Pete Wilson destroyed republicans with Hispanics in California, I think Trump will do the same nationally.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,905
Reputation
4,711
Daps
66,459
It was true in 2008 as well, the difference is that republicans had a clear path to saving themselves. Instead they took the exact opposite path - anti immigration and anti Hispanic in many respects. Note I'm not talking about congress; republicans continue to have advantages in districts throughout the country and that won't immediately change, even after the 2020 census. But nationally the party as it currently stands doesn't have a path to 270 without outside factors such as an economic implosion or scandal.

It's nigh impossible to be elected president without winning nearly 43% of the Hispanic vote. Romney was at 27%, Trump will likely get 20%. A Trump nomination is very likely to ruin the party with Hispanics for the foreseeable future.

Just as Pete Wilson destroyed republicans with Hispanics in California, I think Trump will do the same nationally.
Republicans have shown for the past 20 years that they don't need Congress or the Presidency to run the country.
 

TNC

Hardbody
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
4,900
Reputation
945
Daps
9,403
except trump isnt a 'republican' :what:

voting trump isnt the same as cruz or kasich. i wouldnt actually vote for those two :camby:

especially because they would be being selected by the repub establishment, which is what im voting against :dead: trump IS NOT. hes arguably the only candidate selected by the people against the will of the party. fukk that pic

some of you fags need to take into account that just because americans have only been left with two choices for 'party', that doesnt mean trump or bernie are actually of that party. they didnt have a choice but to borrow the name

does trump represent the republican party and establishment? :what:

does bernie represent the democratic party and establishment? :what:



Unfortunately both Bernie and Trump will be brought unto their chosen party's fold if they were to win office. Just how it goes. We saw it with Obama, a smarter and more well liked guy than either of them. I have no doubt the same can and will happen with them too.
 
Top