If Bernie doesn't get the nod how are you voting (POLL)

How are you voting if Bernie isn't on the Ticket

  • I've been a Hillary Stan since jump

    Votes: 28 14.1%
  • Trump/Rethug

    Votes: 41 20.6%
  • Other - 3rd Party

    Votes: 35 17.6%
  • Not voting

    Votes: 51 25.6%
  • Moving

    Votes: 7 3.5%
  • Hold my nose and vote for the pants suit (happy acri)

    Votes: 37 18.6%

  • Total voters
    199

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,384
Reputation
255
Daps
6,107
I won't be voting for Hillary as much as I'll be voting against Trump.

One, by most non-partisan sources, Trump is one of the least informed and/or most dishonest candidates of my life time. Yes, even more than Hillary Clinton. I know politicians lie just like I know water is wet. But at least I know Clinton has experience in politics, allies in Washington that will be willing to work with her to put forth liberal policies, is relatively knowledgeable about history and American-Middle East relations. She's a bit hawkish for my tastes, but Trump has not shown me he's very knowledgeable or given many issues much thought other than "America's the best", "I'm going to destroy ISIS", "Everything Obama has done has been a disaster". He speaks like a child, and would generally be an embarrassment to me as our leader.

Also his ideas sort of contradict, and I don't feel like he has a coherent vision for America's future. He wants to increase military spending, but thinks it was a big mistake to go into Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, and would only use military in extreme cases? Okay...but our military budget already dwarfs every other country, why spend even more to use it less? Exactly what circumstance would provoke him to use the military? He doesn't want to increase taxes to pay for this spending, but says the national debt is a huge problem? So....how exactly are we going to pay for his tax cuts? He thinks abortions should be made illegal, but planned parenthood provides great services, and had no idea what a reasonable punishment would be for performing them.

And I have no reason to believe he will do anything to really change the system for the better in terms of things like health care, the war on drugs, or campaign finance reform. People always bring up his wealth as if that means he is incorruptible. Hello! He, and people like him, directly benefits from a system in which the wealthy wields a disproportionate amount of influence on our leaders. What possible incentive does Trump have to change that? A Trump presidency would be inviting the fox into the hen house.
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,384
Reputation
255
Daps
6,107
the most important takeaway from this election, is to what degree these 'parties' :scusthov: answer to the people. i cant reward whillary and debbie wasserman scust for this election process

I don't understand what you mean here. Clinton won the popular vote in most states, and got a proportion of the delegates based on that, did she not? The superdelegates are aligning with the will of the people, so exactly what problem do you have with the Democrat primary process?
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
51,625
Reputation
18,772
Daps
281,261
You don't really think Trump will end the Republican Party do you lol?

They're too institutionally strong.
Nah, business cycle ensures both parties will be up and down. But I think demographics are going to result in republicans facing what democrats faced in the 1970s-1980s and early 90s before Clinton.

The party's favorables are trash and nearly every demographic dislikes them nationally. Trump being the nominee allows democrats to paint them as racist sexists for years. Imagine being a ten year old Hispanic kid today. Your concept of republicans is Trump. That won't change in 8 years when you're old enough to vote.
 

CACtain Planet

The Power is YOURS!
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,182
Reputation
-10,750
Daps
13,277
Reppin
CACness Aberdeen
I don't understand what you mean here. Clinton won the popular vote in most states, and got a proportion of the delegates based on that, did she not? The superdelegates are aligning with the will of the people, so exactly what problem do you have with the Democrat primary process?


Most of the Super delegates aligned with Hillary two years ago breh
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,337
Reputation
3,317
Daps
53,593
Reppin
CALI
I don't understand what you mean here. Clinton won the popular vote in most states, and got a proportion of the delegates based on that, did she not? The superdelegates are aligning with the will of the people, so exactly what problem do you have with the Democrat primary process?
Hillary had the super delegates long before the people could vote.

Also, the democratic party played dirty this whole primary.
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,384
Reputation
255
Daps
6,107
Most of the Super delegates aligned with Hillary two years ago breh

Hillary had the super delegates long before the people could vote.

Also, the democratic party played dirty this whole primary.

Yeah, but you don't think they would have changed if the people began supporting Sanders? Wasn't that precisely what happened in 2008?
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
78,489
Reputation
9,780
Daps
211,391
Yeah, but you don't think they would have changed if the people began supporting Sanders? Wasn't that precisely what happened in 2008?

Have the super delegates supporting Clinton in the states Sanders won switched?

My Congressional Rep. here in Washington flat out told people he wasn't changing his vote from Hillary under any circumstances. Bernie won 75% of the fukking state. :dead:

That son of a bytch is getting primaried this November and I'm voting for the Progressive who's challenging him. :ehh:
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,898
Reputation
4,711
Daps
66,397
Nah, business cycle ensures both parties will be up and down. But I think demographics are going to result in republicans facing what democrats faced in the 1970s-1980s and early 90s before Clinton.

The party's favorables are trash and nearly every demographic dislikes them nationally. Trump being the nominee allows democrats to paint them as racist sexists for years. Imagine being a ten year old Hispanic kid today. Your concept of republicans is Trump. That won't change in 8 years when you're old enough to vote.
We said that in 2008. The fact is, politics is local. That image only hurts nationally. Locally, you're good. Besides, all you have to do is disavow Trump. Most of them have already.

It was perceived policy weaknesses (soft on crime) and backlash to the civil rights movement that hurt Dems before Clinton at the presidential level. But they still held Congress throughout that time. And under Clinton they (Rs) held Congress despite his popularity. Republicana are not going anywhere. If Mitt Romney was their candidate this year, Hillary would lose. They come back in 2020 with a "moderate" that their base likes. National party favorables mean nothing.
 
Top