ICE Raids Thread

Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
23,832
Reputation
9,543
Daps
102,095
I'd take anything from John Tanton's group with a silo of salt. They're known to manipulate and mislead on immigration issues to push their agenda, among other things.


 

Bunchy Carter

I'll Take The Money Over The Honey
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
20,807
Reputation
4,005
Daps
87,624
Reppin
Triple O.G. Bunchy Carter

Foreign-Born Number and Share of U.S. Population at All-Time Highs in January 2025​


Highlights from the January 2025 data include:

At 15.8 percent of the total U.S. population, the foreign-born share is higher now than at the prior peaks reached in 1890 and 1910. No U.S. government survey or census has ever shown such a large foreign-born population.

The current numbers have rendered Census Bureau projections obsolete. Just two years ago, the Bureau projected the foreign-born share would not reach 15.8 percent until 2042.

The 53.3 million foreign-born residents are the largest number ever in U.S. history; and the 8.3 million increase in the last four years is larger than the growth in the preceding 12 years.

Black folks going from 2nd to 4th class citizens with this mass arrival of Hispanics and Asians. Thanks Joe :smugbiden:

Dr Claud has been saving for over 30 years that they are going to make Blacks in America a Permanent underclass and hour Black American (Native Blacks) should be against Immigration:



LoL That's funny

Dr. Claud Anderson has always talked about how immigration hurts Native Black people and we should not support immigration and also how Native Black Americans do not benefit from Affirmative Action and how it should be removed.

Dr. Claud Anderson coined the term Native Black Americans

How Immigration Hurts Native Black Americans:

Monday, February 4, 2019
Respected Scholar Explains How Immigration Harms Native Blacks
dr_claud_anderson_founder_harvest_institute.jpg


Dr. Claud Anderson, President of the Harvest Institute

Nationwide — Dr. Claud Anderson, best-selling author and President of The Harvest Institute, says, “Whether it is building a wall or open admission of immigrants, the partisan debate on immigration shut down the federal government and furloughed hundreds of thousands of employee, but has ignored a core issue: the effects of immigration on Native Blacks, the most vulnerable citizens.” The Harvest Institute, a Washington, D.C. based non-profit policy and advocacy organization, has released an article on its website at www.HarvestInstitute.org, meant to address that issue.

Anderson comments, “Executing immigration policies without mitigating the negative impact those polices have on Black Americans is illegal and unconstitutional.” The article explains that the 13th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution, enacted at the end of the 1860’s Civil War, mandated that Black people be treated in all manners similar to Whites and that government must use all necessary means to lift the legacies and burdens of slavery from the shoulders of Blacks. Since then, six succeeding generations of immigrants have been fast tracked into full American Dream membership while Black Americans remain the nation’s official underclass.



The mandates of the 13th and 14th amendments of the U.S. Constitution have been ignored, violated and corrupted. These constitutional amendments were the collective base for the 1866 Civil Rights Laws designed to correct he 1857 Dredd Scott decision that held a Black man had no rights a White man was bound to respect. These laws were originally intended, not for all people, but to specifically correct the systemic injustice imposed upon Black people.

Throughout the nation’s history, there have been successive waves of immigrants that have blocked the access of Native Blacks to, or pushed them off of, the upward mobility ladder of success. After slavery over 100 million European immigrants displaced Blacks in every labor and professional occupation. The article explains how displacement should not be ignored but addressed in policy reform because it continues unabated in areas such as those below.

SPACE: Although immigrants today move into rural communities and suburbs, most tend to migrate into and gentrify majority urban Black communities. They receive direct economic assistance from private and governmental funds that aids them to compete.

ECONOMICS: In comparative and proportional terms, NativeBlacks remain where they were following the Civil War, fixed at the bottom with the least wealth and income. The economic restraining impact that immigration has on Black Americans is quantifiable. For every 10 percent increase in the number of immigrants entering this nation, the annual income of Black Americans is reduced by three-tenths of one percent. As an example, in the 1950’s, Blacks had an earnings ratio of 56 cents to every $1 earned by Whites. As result of the 1960 Black civil rights movement, Black earnings ratio went up to 66 cent compared to the White dollar. However, between 1970 and 1990, there was a 300 percent increase in the number of Hispanic, Asian, and Arab immigrants. The ratio of Black earnings to Whites dropped from 66 cents back to 57 cents. The nine point economic gains of the Black civil rights movement was wiped out by a 300 percent increase of immigrant that occurred between 1970 and 1990.

EMPLOYMENT: Whether the jobs categories are unskilled or highly skilled, there is a long history in the nation of using immigrants to displace Black labor in the workplace. As example, the U.S. Department of Commerce reported that when the Civil War ended, of the 120,000 skilled craftsmen and artisans, over 100,000 of them were Black Americans. By the mid-1890’s, new immigration policies bought in 26 million immigrants who blocked Black opportunities and totally displaced them in skilled crafts, farming and businesses. Today, nearly 50 percent of the workers who fill highly technical jobs are immigrants recruited and hired under the H-1B visa program. Since 2007, approximately 48 percent of all new hires were Hispanics. Whether government or private business, programs that target employment opportunities are not the same for Native Blacks who are not immigrants.

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND PUBLIC POLICIES: Affirmative Action programs were originally intended to be corrective actions for the handicapping conditions and injustices imposed by law on 22 generations of Black Americans. Public policies that ignore the exceptional history of and equate the newly arriving immigrants to Native Black Americans, compounds the racial injustices embedded in the U.S. Constitution and subsequent laws. There is no constitutional mandate to provide benefits to immigrants over Native Blacks.

HARVEST INSTITUTE POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS: The Harvest Institute article contends that the nation has not complied with either the 13th or 14th amendments to the Constitution or the 1866 civil rights laws. Immigration policies to build an equitable America should be based on the following understandings: 1) that legal and illegal immigration have made Blacks a permanent minority-loser in a majority-wins society; 2) the original intent of the 13th and 14th constitutional amendments was to protect Black Americans; 3) immigration policies should establish Protected Class status for Blacks similar to that of American Indians; 4) Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients fled their countries to escape the very conditions that are currently endured by Blacks in urban America. Continuation of the DACA program should mitigate the negative effects on Native Blacks; 5) prohibit eligibility of immigrants for Affirmative Action programs and benefits; 6) education and citizenship training programs required of immigrants should include Black history content on the contributions of Native Blacks to this nation; 7) increase the quota of immigrants of Black African descent and reform existing immigration laws to treat Haitian refugees equal to Cuban and other migrating people.

Note: Dr. Anderson more thoroughly examines immigration in his books, Black Labor, White Wealth, PowerNomics: The National Plan and A Black History Reader: 101 Questions You Never Thought to Ask (www.powernomics.com).



PRESS CONTACT:
Joann Anderson, The Harvest Institute
301-564-6075
harvest623@aol.com

via: Respected Scholar Explains How Immigration Harms Native Blacks







 

Bunchy Carter

I'll Take The Money Over The Honey
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
20,807
Reputation
4,005
Daps
87,624
Reppin
Triple O.G. Bunchy Carter



Dr. Claud Anderson was spot on with them bringing in these immigrants into undermine Black Americans, but it back fired on them because they ended up voting Red. Dr. Claud Anderson use to hold those conferences in the 90's out here in LA at Crenshaw Christian Center (Faithdome) with Dr. Frederick KC Price, my mom and pops use to go to them when I was a kid
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,796
Reputation
334
Daps
21,449
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Dr. Claud Anderson was spot on with them bringing in these immigrants into undermine Black Americans, but it back fired on them because they ended up voting Red. Dr. Claud Anderson use to hold those conferences in the 90's out here in LA at Crenshaw Christian Center (Faithdome) with Dr. Frederick KC Price, my mom and pops use to go to them when I was a kid
c00n babble. A minority majority is better for black Americans than a white majority. Blacks have been underclass of America since it’s inception
 

voltronblack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
4,753
Reputation
1,813
Daps
14,457
Reppin
NULL
c00n babble. A minority majority is better for black Americans than a white majority. Blacks have been underclass of America since it’s inception
:russ:Only if minority majority are not :mjpls: themselves which both Hispanic and Asian have show themselves to be and it only going to get worse over time .

https://adage.com/article/cmo-strat...s/2320866?mc_cid=feb568cebc&mc_eid=d2baa7ab98
“I went against Bloomberg for the soda tax and now they want to eliminate the office and give most of the money to Black Lives Matter and give us crumbs—the community that distributes Coca-Cola?” Garcia fumed. “Why isn’t Coca-Cola making the same investment in what they’re doing with African American businesses with the Latino and bodega businesses that are going under?”

There is no evidence that Coca-Cola has given any money to the Black Lives Matter organization, but the company announced in June 2020 that the Coca-Cola Foundation would donate $2.5 million to the Equal Justice Initiative, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and the National Center for Civil and Human Rights.
The far-right group Proud Boys allegedly received more than $80,00 in donations from Chinese Americans and the broader Chinese diaspora a month before the Capitol riot, according to a report by USA Today.

The money was sent as part of a crowdfunding effort to help the Proud Boys pay for medical expenses after four people were stabbed in Washington DC in December 2020 during a confrontation with Black Lives Matter protesters (officials did not comment on which group the injured individuals belonged to at the time).
The crowdfunding effort raised a total of $106,107 — 80% of which came from American Asians and the broader Chinese diaspora, according to USA Today, which obtained data from the whistleblower site Distributed Denial of Secrets.

The investigation tracked some donations to addresses in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan.

Several donors who spoke to USA Today said they had sent money to the Proud Boys because they supported Former President Donald Trump, and felt that America was under attack from communism, a claim often touted by right-wing commentators, including conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

The donors also told the paper they felt the Proud Boys were protecting the country from antifa and the Black Lives Matter protesters.

"You have to understand how we feel — we came from communist China and we managed to come here and we appreciate it here so much," said Rebecca Kwan, who donated $500, USA Today reported. "The Proud Boys are for Trump, and they are fighting antifa, and can you see anything good that antics did except destroy department stores and small businesses?"

Another donor, Donald Wang from New York, who donated $50 to the organization, told USA Today: "The Proud Boys are protecting the innocent pople. A lot of people in my community support them."
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,796
Reputation
334
Daps
21,449
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
:russ:Only if minority majority are not :mjpls: themselves which both Hispanic and Asian have show themselves to be and it only going to get worse over time .

https://adage.com/article/cmo-strat...s/2320866?mc_cid=feb568cebc&mc_eid=d2baa7ab98

Majority of proud boys are white. No race has oppressed black people in America more than white people.

In a minority majority white people have less power. You have to do incredible gymnastics to argue that if white people have more power it’ll be better for black people
 

voltronblack

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
4,753
Reputation
1,813
Daps
14,457
Reppin
NULL
Majority of proud boys are white. No race has oppressed black people in America more than white people.

In a minority majority white people have less power. You have to do incredible gymnastics to argue that if white people have more power it’ll be better for black people
:jbhmm: I disagree, just take a look at Latin America. On top, you have people of color who are as close to white as possible, and at the bottom, you have blacks and other darker people. This is where the US is heading. White people with power will still hold power, while non-black people of color will act as their proxy, and throw black people under the bus as a result.
 
Top