You can't discredit something by saying ''no'' or ''you're just wrong''. He can disagree but without reason it's just ''nut uh!''.
Mature people read opinions they don't like and usually keep it moving or reply. The moment they frequent the site less because they stereotyped hundreds of opinions into one thing and ''can't stand it'', they become immature...and emotional.
And he wasn't playing concerned poster who wants us all to mentor each other to run through gorgeous women, lmao, he's playing condescending self-help guru...quite blatantly.
So he barely posts because he can't stand ''men's opinions'', but he didn't make the thread because of it? You're confused.
Should a mature man see things for what they are and keep doing him, or is it ideal for productive men to ''expect too much'' from strangers who have no bearing on their life?
He said good looking women are lonely and ought to be fukked, when he didn't bother enlightening us on what a woman of worth is. Or is that it? I don't have to ask him, since you've clearly got this.
You must be getting emotional based on the detailed way you responded to my comment....
See how easy that was?
Now on to my response... You're thinking way too hard breh. Wayyyyy to hard. And you're intent on filling in blanks so you can prove some imaginary point.
1.) He didn't say that he frequented the site any less because of the idiotic opinions on her, only that he barely posts. There are plenty of lurkers on this site, for many reasons. That appears to be his, and to each his own.
2.) He didn't seem condescending at all to me. But maybe that's because I don't believe that I fall into the description of men he's talking about. Maybe you relate, and you feel he's being condescending toward you? But I don't know you so
3.) Why he rarely posts and why he started this thread aren't necessarily related. Him creating this thread could have been sparked by a desire to enlighten, or because he was inspired by another post, not necessarily because his disdain had been festering so long that he just couldn't take it anymore.... But of course those other possibilties wouldn't have given you the opportunity to call someone a "little girl." Lol.... The topic of this thread and your responses are kind of ironic, really.
4.) Why are you wondering what he considers a women of worth? Clearly, based off that opinion alone, his definition of a women of worth doesn't seem credible to me. But still, that's my opinion. Regardless, you never made mention of this need of an explanation before, so I'm not sure why you're bringing it up in your response to me.
5.) I'd be willing to guess that he's one of those people who expects too much from people in society in general, not just on this board. Kind of like intelligent people who can't understand why everyone can't understand things the way that they do.
You seem to be deciding on your own what the poster is doing and who he is, as if you could read his mind or as if you were with him as he was posting. You clearly know his emotional status and his own intents better than him... all based off a single post. I applaud you sir.... You have a bright future in clinical psychology ahead of you
I'd be more likely to believe that he's a sociopath than than that he was being emotional... Or he could just be a weirdo. I have no idea.
Who I think is a woman of worth is 100% irrelevant. To each his own. But what I mean in this case is, guys worship beauty. This is natural but it's also wrong. The truly hot girls are very different from the fantasies men build around them. A lot of the time their "real" selves would be disappointing to the average sheep-man who automatically assumes that a hot girl has any more value than he does. 
didn't think I'd learn anything in this thread but that is something for me to think about. Thank you.