I don't think we've seen 5% of what Julius Randle is capable of

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Are you denying you made this post on Nov. 28, 2019?
.

Look, you pathological lying ass nxgga.

I quoted this post of yours:

Randle will be a SUPERSTAR and easily the 2nd best player in the 2014 class after Wiggins. Lakers struck a gold mine with 7th pick last year.

On November 2nd, 3rd, 12th and 28th. I'm quoting you with the same damn thing every time. It's the same post I wanted you to address. You ducked it every time. It doesn't matter if you quoted that post from the 28th or the 12th or the 2nd or the 3rd because they're the same post. I just kept reminding you of it to address it, on all different days.

I even quoted that same post of yours and tagged you on December 5th.

You just picked any post of mine and quoted it. You're drowning here because you're not making any sense.

Now back to this:

You quoted my post and laughed. You expect me to respond to everytime I'm quoted?

After I proved you ducked my posts on those days, are you finally going to admit you're p*ssy and a hypocrite? You were well aware of all the times I quoted you in this thread, but chose to ignore them, only to then upp the thread two years later.

 

[Remote]

"You expect me to respond to everytime I'm quoted?"

Look at this shameless shyt.



So you admit you're a p*ssy who did in fact duck my posts (then lied about being banned when I confronted you with evidence that proved that contrary), and then had the mitigated gall to upp this thread two years later quoting me, and then accusing me of of ducking your posts, like you didn't ignore my posts/tags for over two cotdamn years. What do you see when you look in the mirror. I bet it's p*ssy.

You seeing this shyt right now @Remote.

That man is shameless.
Never seen anything like it in all my years on the internet.

 

[Swagnificent]

Look, you pathological lying ass nxgga.

I quoted this post of yours:

On November 2nd, 3rd, 12th and 28th. I'm quoting you with the same damn thing every time. It's the same post I wanted you to address. You ducked it every time. It doesn't matter if you quoted that post from the 28th or the 12th or the 2nd or the 3rd because they're the same post. I just kept reminding you of it to address it, on all different days.

I even quoted that same post of yours and tagged you on December 5th.

You just picked any post of mine and quoted it. You're drowning here because you're not making any sense.

Now back to this:

After I proved you ducked my posts on those days, are you finally going to admit you're p*ssy and a hypocrite? You were well aware of all the times I quoted you in this thread, but chose to ignore them, only to then upp the thread two years.

Stop trying to muddy the waters. Remember what our dispute is SPECIFICALLY about. I called you out for waiting until an opportune time to respond to being called out. I called that p*ssy behavior on your part. You responded with the childlike argument "but what about you". I told you I don't do that and cited the FACT I was banned during the time you made THAT SPECIFIC POST that I quoted 2 years later.

You have been ever since to counter me argument. And the best you could do is cite other posts you made BEFORE THE POST THAT KICKED EVERYTHING OFF. We are not talking about every post you made in this thread quoting me with a silly emoji. We are talking about the one post you made on Nov. 28, 2019 that I quoted on May 13, 2021. I never saw that post when you originally made it and waited until an opportune moment to addreas it because I was banned at that time. If I had responded to your posts from early Nov. 2019 then you might have a point. But the post I quoted from you that kicked everything off happened on Nov. 28, 2019. That is what we're talking about. Not what happened before.

 

[Swagnificent]

That man is shameless.
Never seen anything like it in all my years on the internet.

So are you his cheerleader or groupie?

I've already deaded his silly attempt at misdirection. Just look at my previous post.

I expect his bytch ass to run away again very soon like he always does when getting owned in an argument.

 

[Remote]

So are you his cheerleader or groupie?

I've already deaded his silly attempt at misdirection. Just look at my previous post.

I expect his bytch ass to run away again very soon like he always does when getting owned in an argument.

Your arguments are based on the look in players eyes. They’re literally meaningless

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Stop trying to muddy the waters. Remember what our dispute is SPECIFICALLY about. I called you out for waiting until an opportune time to respond to being called out. I called that p*ssy behavior on your part. You responded with the childlike argument "but what about you". I told you I don't do that and cited the FACT I was banned during the time you made THAT SPECIFIC POST that I quoted 2 years later.

You have been ever since to counter me argument. And the best you could do is cite other posts you made BEFORE THE POST THAT KICKED EVERYTHING OFF. We are not talking about every post you made in this thread quoting me with a silly emoji. We are talking about the one post you made on Nov. 28, 2019 that I quoted on May 13, 2021. I never saw that post when you originally made it and waited until an opportune moment to addreas it because I was banned at that time. If I had responded to your posts from early Nov. 2019 then you might have a point. But the post I quoted from you that kicked everything off happened on Nov. 28, 2019. That is what we're talking about. Not what happened before.

The amount of times you lied and disregarded that I already debunked your weak ass excuse throughout this post is a clear sign of mental illness.



You lied and said you were banned when I upped this thread, to which you asked me to provide proof of you posting when I upped this thread and I did so. You then said "You do know there are 24 hours in a day? I was prolly banned/bushed earlier that day while you posted later on.", to which then I gave further evidence of you posting before and after the days of me upping this thread, on multiple days, where you were going around making threads and posts. You then respond with "You expect me to respond to everytime I'm quoted?", this is you admitting that while you were active on this board, why should you be expected to respond to every time you're quoted. Basically, you admitted you're a p*ssy right there for ducking when I posted/tagged you.

To cover your tracks you then shamelessly picked one post of mine that you're making out you were banned for, which is a post that is the same as all the other posts I quoted you earlier in that month, and before that month, and after that month. It's the SAME cotdamn post. You saw me quoting it because you were active on this board, not once, but multiple times.

You then chose to wait until two years later to upp this thread despite the fact you ignored the countless times that you were quoted/tagged in this thread.

Why don't we have a count of how many times you ignored me quoting and tagging you before you ended up upping this thread?

Are you ready for it?

Your last post in this thread was November 2nd 2018. You then upped this thread on May 13th 2021. That's nearly three years you chose to ignore this thread and all the times you were quoted and tagged in it. Over these three years, you were quoted/tagged 11 times by me and other posters, and you ignored all of them to shamelessly upp this thread THREE years later after last posting in it.

You a p*ssy and will always be a p*ssy.

 

[Swagnificent]

The amount of times you lied and disregarded that I already debunked your weak ass excuse throughout this post is a clear sign of mental illness.



You lied and said you were banned when I upped this thread, to which you asked me to provide proof of you posting when I upped this thread and I did so. You then said "You do know there are 24 hours in a day? I was prolly banned/bushed earlier that day while you posted later on.", to which then I gave further evidence of you posting before and after the days of me upping this thread, on multiple days, where you were going around making threads and posts. You then respond with "You expect me to respond to everytime I'm quoted?", this is you admitting that while you were active on this board, why should you be expected to respond to every time you're quoted. Basically, you admitted you're a p*ssy right there for ducking when I posted/tagged you.

To cover your tracks you then shamelessly picked one post of mine that you're making out you were banned for, which is a post that is the same as all the other posts I quoted you earlier in that month, and before that month, and after that month. It's the SAME cotdamn post. You saw me quoting it because you were active on this board, not once, but multiple times.

You then chose to wait until two years later to upp this thread despite the fact you ignored the countless times that you were quoted/tagged in this thread.

Why don't we have a count of how many times you ignored me quoting and tagging you before you ended up upping this thread?

Are you ready for it?

Your last post in this thread was November 2nd 2018. You then upped this thread on May 13th 2021. That's nearly three years you chose to ignore this thread and all the times you were quoted and tagged in it. Over these three years, you were quoted/tagged 11 times by me and other posters, and you ignored all of them to shamelessly upp this thread THREE years later after last posting in it.

You a p*ssy and will always be a p*ssy.

I had to change my response to you cause I didn't pay close enough attention to your tricks. I'll blame myself for trusting you to argue in a genuine manner. Didn't think you would resort of misinformation tactics.

At the end of the day, the post I quoted that kicked things off was dated NOV. 28, 2019. Why you would cite posts from NOV. 2, 2019 makes no sense.

I responded to a post you made dated Nov. 28th. Stop talking to me about shyt I never quoted to respond to AT AN EARLIER TIME.

 

[Swagnificent]

Your arguments are based on the look in players eyes. They’re literally meaningless

Ok. And how is this relevant to anything being discussed right now. Like your boyfriend @Gil Scott-Heroin you resort to irrelevant points when you got no relevant counter argument.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

I had to change my response to you cause I didn't pay close enough attention to your tricks. I'll blame myself for trusting you to argue in a genuine manner. Didn't think you would resort of misinformation tactics.

At the end of the day, the post I quoted that kicked things off was dated NOV. 28, 2019. Why you would cite posts from NOV. 2, 2019 makes no sense.

I responded to a post you made dated Nov. 28th. Stop talking to me about shyt I never quoted to respond to AT ANY TIME.

Look at this nxgga backtrack after he got caught out lying, multiple times.



The proof is all there for everyone to see how you're a lying ass p*ssy ass hypocrite.

 

[Remote]

Ok. And how is this relevant to anything being discussed right now. Like your boyfriend @Gil Scott-Heroin you resort to irrelevant points when you got no relevant counter argument.

Glad you acknowledged the way you evaluate players is irrelevant.

You’re making progress.

 

[Swagnificent]

Look at this nxgga backtrack after he got caught out lying, multiple times.



The proof is all there for everyone to see how you're a lying ass p*ssy ass hypocrite.

How am I lying? I only quoted a post you made on Nov. 28, 2019. I said I was banned at that time hence why I addressed it in 2021 rather than at that moment. You are the one who brought up posts from Nov. 2, 2019, which I have never addressed.

You're the only one lying here. Not me.

 

[Swagnificent]

Glad you acknowledged the way you evaluate players is irrelevant.

You’re making progress.

Irrelevant to this back n forth. Stop with the silly semantics.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Bruh you on worse bath salts than Swag if you seriously think anybody on that list outside of Jokic and Embiid is clearly better than Randle. You should know that Swag regurgitates hot takes at such an exponential rate that a few of the players he sets his goofy gaze on will inevitably end up being actually good through sheer statistical probability alone

Saying you'd take a guy like Lavine obviously over Randle is like salty fools saying they'd obviously take Melo at this point of his career over "top 30" Draymond; it's just nonsense to try and win some stupid argument. We know you don't really believe that shyt, don't fall into Swag's game of trolling when 1 out of his 1000 predictions turns out to be somewhat sorta correct

This stupid ass dumb bytch tried to say anybody that thought LaVine was better than Julius was on bath salts.

 

[Raquinotj]

We still waiting. He gave 5% here on defense.

 

[Whips-n-Chains]

If he’s a first second or even third option on your team…y’all not winning shyt