I dont see a problem with the replacement refs

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,247
Reputation
5,820
Daps
161,668
Reppin
PG x MD
The fact of the matter is alot of these games would have completely different outcomes if not for these refs. I can only speak on my team the Redskins games (only team Ive paid much attention to) and if the Refs dont let all the extra dumb shyt go on all game, idk if that Morgan shyt happens where he gets frustrated to the point of throwing a ball at a nikka. They also call alot of pass interference, illegal contact, holding its to the point where teams can now just throw jump balls on every drive and they'll most likely get a call. They also blow plays dead too erly, they did that shyt yesterday in the skins-Bengals game on a fumble, if they dont blow it dead Josh Wilson picks up the funble and returns it for a TD, it puts the skins up 31-24 and possibly and different outcome...

Obviously what Im complaining about is completely biased and the Refs have thrown some questionable calls Imo that went in the skins favor but I aint goin complain about those tho
:troll:
 

fantabolous

smart usage of data plan
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
795
Reputation
340
Daps
1,620
Reppin
The 313
I think their "effect on the game" has been horribly blown out of proportion up to this point in the season. It just amazes me that people act like they've never complained about a call in any season before this one, and now suddenly this is the first year ever with any questionable calls. Typically in any game I've ever watched there's at least a couple of questionable calls per game, just now everybody has a central thing to blame it on.

The worst thing about the replacement refs so far imo is that they have made some of the wrong calls, though not noticeably wrong. IE calling illegal contact instead of defensive holding, or defensive holding instead of PI (but like 5 yards down the field) so the outcome of the play would've been practically the same
 
Top