I don't know if I believe in dinosaurs anymore..

[OneManGang]

Some people in here are so mind-blowingly stupid.

I'm reading this thread and thinking to myself...this is the voting public. Jesus Christ.

Also there hasn't been any fully in tact DNA of dinosaurs found. DNA degrades rather quickly and this is hundreds of millions of years we are talking about here.

 

[Spoonz]

I'm reading this thread and thinking to myself...this is the voting public. Jesus Christ.

Also there hasn't been any fully in tact DNA of dinosaurs found. DNA degrades rather quickly and this is hundreds of millions of years we are talking about here.

They've found preserved mosquitos with dinosaur blood. I learned about it in Biology.

 

[OneManGang]

They've found preserved mosquitos with dinosaur blood. I learned about it in Biology.

No, you learned that from Steven Spielberg. They probably found remnants of DNA components or base pairs but no genes. It hasn't happened. I challenge you to find a link from a credible source.

Edit:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...-dinosaur-DNA-could-not-survive-in-amber.html

I just realized what you said. You could be right. But blood doesn't mean there was useable, readable DNA

 

[Spoonz]

No, you learned that from Steven Spielberg. They probably found remnants of DNA components or base pairs but no genes. It hasn't happened. I challenge you to find a link from a credible source.

Edit:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...-dinosaur-DNA-could-not-survive-in-amber.html

I just realized what you said. You could be right. But blood doesn't mean there was useable, readable DNA

Yeah it does and it's possible to bring them back along with other extinct species but it's too expensive

 

[OneManGang]

Yeah it does and it's possible to bring them back along with other extinct species but it's too expensive

No it doesn't. Especially not 65 million year old blood. DNA is not a durable molecule. You are lucky to find it in a 100 year old corpse, much less anything older. Did you even read the link? Trust me on this one. We couldnt clone a dinosaur with all the money in the world. Dude in the movie barely did it but had to enhance the DNA with reptilian segments

 

[Spoonz]

No it doesn't. Especially not 65 million year old blood. DNA is not a durable molecule. You are lucky to find it in a 100 year old corpse, much less anything older. Did you even read the link? Trust me on this one. We couldnt clone a dinosaur with all the money in the world. Dude in the movie barely did it but had to enhance the DNA with reptilian segments

we could do the same. Birds are genetically close to dinosaurs and so are crocodiles and komodo dragons.

 

[OneManGang]

we could do the same. Birds are genetically close to dinosaurs and so are crocodiles and komodo dragons.

Molecular genetics, chemistry, or molecular cell bio doesn't work like this breh. It's sci fi.

 

[Data-Hawk]

Dont see how a troll thread got this far.

 

[Spoonz]

Dont see how a troll thread got this far.

troll or not, some people actually believe dinos never existed breh

 

[Grew_Up_Hella_Early]

Can you imagine the pandemonium? The Pterodactyls would be groomed and trained security officials (like k9s). Marshall law would be implemented and you'd have to be indoors by 7, right before THEY release the PATROLEodactlys. These vicious beast will comb through the skies just searching for people out after curfew .

folks would be shooting down pterodactyls for fun,shyts would be extinct in a month

 

[Chris.B]

troll or not, some people actually believe dinos never existed breh

whats wrong with that?

 

[Spoonz]

whats wrong with that?

it's crazy talk there's mountains of evidence

 

[stealthbomber]

@ this going 5 pages

 

[Houston911]

I found someone else that agrees with my theory

http://dinosaursneverexisted.com/

Wow

What an informative site

 

[drewbreez]

everyone knows dinosaurs died in the holocaust