@
BarNone @
Brown_Pride
this is how it should have been done
if you stuck to the script, no one would have anything to complain about. but here we are...
so i'll go down the post list and lets see... (from the original thread)
post
#2 - 5 nominations - adhered to rules
post
#3 - useless fluff
post $4 - useless fluff
post 5 - demonic post
6 - useless fluff
7 - 4 votes and a self nomination
8 - useless
10 - fluff
11 - a smile that i could assume was an indication of someone wanting to say they want the same votes?
12 - literally one word. TWISM
13 - 3 words in response to the previously mentioned one word
14 - a commentary about the merits of one poster
15 - fluff
16 - demonery
Page 2
17 - 23 - fluff
24 - 5 nominations
25 - 29 fluff
30 - 5 nominations
etc, etc, etc.
If you're gonna complain about scripts how about we comment on the majority of the thread being completely off script. You wanna base the nominations off that fuked thread? There's a reason I made the thread the way it was an suggested 2 rounds, that reason being the extremely convoluted instructions of "nominate 5 posters" went completely over the heads of damn near everyone in this forum. So rather than try to interpret what a smile meant, or a dap, or worse yet ONLY taking the nominations of the 6 people who actually followed protocol and nominated 5 people as prescribed, i decided to try to bring order to the shyt.
Let me let you in on a little secret, not that it matters much, but HL is the source of the most complaints, the most reports, and honestly the most biotching of all other forums on this piece. We're also one of the smallest in terms of regulars. We're literally known as the "special" forum.
Wanna know why? For shyt like this.
There is quite literally a debate/discussion/disagreement about nominations that were conducted via a public poll.
Never knew why @
BarNone was always so salty, i now know.
for recognizing good posting, now vote for The Arcadium's Poster Of 2012!
