examples of white supremacy oppressing blacks in china breh.
That isn't what I've said, my message has been consistent and now you're projecting issues you may have with internalised racism.
examples of white supremacy oppressing blacks in china breh.
I responded to this:That isn't what I've said, my message has been consistent and now you're projecting issues you may have with internalised racism.
As I've stated, racism is the system that opresses black folks and the global anti black mentality is a result of racism white supremacy. What's so hard to understand?
They're all bad too.
Me and my wife after my car accident a few weeks ago
She isn't even the first black person to marry into our family.
its not the norm because there are hardly any black people in china. not even 0.05%.full respect to you and your beautiful wife. Your family is very progressive, but not the norm at all in China. Chinese sentiments towards blacks is influenced more by cacs from the west whom have brought their hate for black people with them to the east.
You have any sources for this by chance?Chinese sentiments towards blacks is influenced more by cacs from the west whom have brought their hate for black people with them to the east.
I responded to this:
I wrote: I am not under white supremacy, nor a system set up to oppress black folks.
you chimed in with the lol.
care to explain how I am currently under white supremacy? or oppressed? this isn't projection, you literally said this shyt my nikka.
You havent been consistent because you havent answered the question. you stated I am affected inadvertently and I asked you to give me examples, you havent given me a single one. and that is most likely...because you cant.Again, my message has been consistent but you seem so hell-bent on proving to everybody white people aren't oppressing you that you are overlooking white supremacy's scope. Even if it isn't affecting you directly, you are are a victim of it inadvertently and will be so for as long as the system exists.
From the very speech you told me to read (granted it is from 1924):
Since the day of Japan's victory over Russia, the peoples of Asia have cherished the hope of shaking off the yoke of European oppression, a hope which has given rise to a series or independence movements-in Egypt, Persia, Turkey, Afghanistan, and finally in India. Therefore, Japan's defeat of Russia gave rise to a great hope for the independence of Asia. From the inception of this hope to the present day only 20 years have elapsed. The Egyptian, Turkish, Persian, Afghan, and Arabian independence movements have already materialized, and even the independence movement in India has, with the passage of time, been gaining ground. Such facts are concrete proofs of the progress of the nationalist idea in Asia. Until this idea reaches its full maturity, no unification or independence movement of the Asiatic peoples as a whole is possible. In East Asia, China and Japan are the two greatest peoples. China and Japan are the driving force of this nationalist movement. What will be the consequences of this driving force still remains to be seen. The present tide of events seems to indicate that not only China and Japan but all the peoples in East Asia will unite together to restore the former status of Asia.
Such a tendency is clearly evident to the eyes of Europe and America. One American scholar [1] has written a book to discuss the rise of the colored peoples, where he maintains that Japan's defeat of Russia amounts to a victory of the Yellow race over the White race, and that such a tendency, if unchecked, will result in the unification of the entire Yellow race, which will be a calamity for the White peoples, and ways and means should therefore be devised to prevent it. Subsequently, he wrote another book in which he described all emancipation movements as Revolts against Civilization. In his view, emancipation movements in Europe should be regarded as revolts against civilization; even more so should such emancipation movements in Asia be regarded. Such views are common among the privileged classes of -people in both Europe and America. A minority, they oppress the majority in their own continent or country. Now they wish to extend their evil practice to Asia, with a view to suppressing the nine hundred million people of Asia, and treating them as their slaves. This American scholar considers the awakening of the Asiatic peoples as a revolt against civilization. Thus, the Westerners consider themselves as the only ones possessed and worthy of true culture and civilization; other peoples with any culture or independent ideas are considered as Barbarians in revolt against Civilization. When comparing Occidental with Oriental civilization they only consider their own civilization logical and humanitarian.
From the aspect of cultural development during the last several hundred years, the material civilization of Europe has reached its height while Oriental civilization has remained stagnant. Outwardly, Europe is superior to Asia. Fundamentally, European civilization during the last several hundred years is one of scientific materialism. Such a civilization, when applied to society, will mean the cult of force, with aeroplanes, bombs, and cannons as its outstanding features. Recently, this cult of force has been repeatedly employed by the Western peoples to oppress Asia, and as a consequence, there is no progress in Asia. To oppress others with the cult of force, in the language of the Ancients, is the rule of Might. Therefore, European civilization is nothing but the rule of Might. The rule of might has always been looked down upon by the Orient. There is another kind of civilization superior to the rule of Might. The fundamental characteristics of this civilization are benevolence, justice and morality: This civilization makes people respect, not fear, it. Such a civilization is, in the language of the Ancients, the rule of Right or the Kingly Way. One may say, therefore, that Oriental civilization is one of the rule of right. Since the development of European materialistic civilization and the cult of Might, the morality of the world has been on the decline. Even in Asia, morality in several countries has degenerated. Of late, a number of European and American scholars have begun to study Oriental civilization and they realize that, while materially the Orient is far behind the Occident, morally the Orient is superior to the Occident.
You havent been consistent because you havent answered the question. you stated I am affected inadvertently and I asked you to give me examples, you havent given me a single one. and that is most likely...because you cant.
read the last line of the speech. the orient believes he is and is destined to be the superior civilization, so how in the world is white supremacy effecting ME in china? a country which views itself morally superior to the white one?
that's like saying Christianity inadvertently affects you because it exists, despite living in Dubai. sorry breh but thats not how it works.As long as it exists, you are a victim of it. It affects you in inadvertently because it exists, China is putting up a very good fight but the system still exists globally. If you wouldn't mind me asking why are you living in China? You're from Congo (?).
They aren't there yet breh but they aren't too far.
that's like saying Christianity inadvertently affects you because it exists, despite living in Dubai. sorry breh but thats not how it works.
Im not from congo, Im from la, my mother is from congo, my pops is from NOLA.
Im not from congo, Im from la, my mother is from congo, my pops is from NOLA.