While that is true, it doesn't mean that you support the decision to do "the decision."
People watch crap on tv all the time that they don't necessarily condone personally. If I watch Fox news that doesn't mean I agree with their viewpoints.
Yeah it does. People only had a problem with the Decision after the fact. No one was saying before hand that it was so horrible and the worst thing ever and he's such an arrogant ass because the possibility that he would pick their team was still there. It's basically the equivalent of accusing the dealer of cheating when you lose at the casino. If you had won, even if he was cheating it would be cool. Cheating isn't he issue, the fact that you lost is the issue. People need to stop putting all of this fake morality in front of hurt feelings and just call it what it is.
You can't say something shouldn't be done and support it's existence at the same time. If you watch Fox News obviously you don't think it shouldn't exist, you may disagree with what you see but obviously it's existence doesn't trouble you that much. If it does then why watch it? To get mad? To have something to complain about? That is stupid. It's one thing to say you don't like or agree something. It's another to say it shouldnt' exist after supporting its existence. nikkas are saying he shouldn't have done the shyt, not that they disagree with what he did on there.