Husband dumps wife 30 secs after giving birth to black baby

Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,665
Reppin
NULL
You’re talking socially, I’m talking scientifically.

That is science your genes determine what you look like

I look more like my father's father than my own father, it's random which genes you can get

you can get a gene from ancestor 100 years ago and be the spitting image of that person almost a duplicate
 

TEKBEATZ

Banging Pads
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,561
Reputation
7,040
Daps
58,653
Reppin
Saint Petersburg. FL
Black genetics are so strong lol. It's no wonder they have a

ab67616d0000b2736b9fd6945970320796b2c45a
.
I wear this logo on a t shirt at work once a week.
 

levitate

I love you, you know.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
39,282
Reputation
5,834
Daps
149,178
Reppin
The Multiverse
That is science your genes determine what you look like

I look more like my father's father than my own father, it's random which genes you can get

you can get a gene from ancestor 100 years ago and be the spitting image of that person almost a duplicate
Yeah, I’m talking on a deeper level. Like what is the mode of determining what gene is dominant. I understand there are dominant genes, I just don’t understand why. Brown eyes are dominant over green…but why?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,850
Reppin
the ether
Typical ignorant person, who can't be challenged over facts without feeling personal attacks

you have offered nothing but you opinion, which you have backed up with nothing
I didn't need to add anything because YOUR link said that 2.8 million year old fossil wasn't our species. You misread the article, that's not my opinion, that's a fact.



if white people evolved from black people they would be a different species that what's evolution is and what you agreed to, and you contradicted yourself without even realizing it

just give it a rest lmao
That's 100% false and shows that you don't even understand basic evolution. Evolution is a constant process, it's not some magic that just turns one species into a new species. Every genetic difference between populations is part of evolution no matter how small.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,665
Reppin
NULL
I didn't need to add anything because YOUR link said that 2.8 million year old fossil wasn't our species. You misread the article, that's not my opinion, that's a fact.




That's 100% false and shows that you don't even understand basic evolution. Evolution is a constant process, it's not some magic that just turns one species into a new species. Every genetic difference between populations is part of evolution no matter how small.

You have posted any evidence of evolution because it doesn't exists

you are confusing mutation with evolution

Mutation
the changing of the structure of a gene, resulting in a variant form that may be transmitted to subsequent generations, caused by the alteration of single base units in DNA, or the deletion, insertion, or rearrangement of larger sections of genes or chromosomes:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,850
Reppin
the ether
Yeah, I’m talking on a deeper level. Like what is the mode of determining what gene is dominant. I understand there are dominant genes, I just don’t understand why. Brown eyes are dominant over green…but why?

Eye color is based on the amount of melanin in your irises. Blue eyes only happen if there's the minimal melanin in your eyes (green is moderately more). They're recessive because if either parent gives you the melanin-producing (brown) eye color gene, then that melanin is going to get produced and your eyes will turn out brown. So you only end up with blue or green eyes when NEITHER parent gives you the high melanin-producing gene.

Genetics of Eye Color



For dominant/recessive genes in general the answer is more complex. Here's a decent explanation:

Understanding Genetics

The simplest situation of dominant and recessive alleles is if one allele makes a broken protein. When this happens, the working protein is usually dominant. The broken protein doesn't do anything, so the working protein wins out.

A great example of a recessive allele is red hair. There's a protein called MC1R, and one of its usual jobs is to get rid of red pigment. When it isn't working, you get a buildup of red pigment and end up with red hair.

All it takes to keep from having red hair is a little bit of MC1R protein. So it's easy to see why red hair is recessive. As long as you have one working MC1R gene, you won't have red hair. The working protein picks up the slack. If both copies of your MC1R gene code for broken proteins, then you'll have red hair.

These kinds of dominant and recessive alleles help explain brown and (probably green) eyes. They may also help explain traits like whether you have hanging or attached earlobes, and whether you put your left or right thumb on top when you cross your hands.

But a recessive broken allele doesn't explain everything. Not by a long shot.

Sometimes having only one normal copy of a gene just isn't enough. Our cells need a certain dose, or amount, of certain proteins. If we have one broken copy, the normal copy can't always pick up the slack. This is called haploinsufficiency.

One example of this is a protein called CD2AP, which helps our kidneys filter out the bad stuff from our blood. People with one broken copy of CD2AP still have kidney disease, even though they have one good copy of the gene around. One copy just doesn't make enough filters for our blood. We need two good copies to get the job done.

And there are lots of other situations. Sometimes the recessive allele is the normal one and the dominant allele is a broken version. Sounds crazy, right?

Well, this can happen if the broken protein does something new, or gums up the works somehow. This is pretty complicated stuff, so we'll compare it to a basketball team to make it a little easier to understand. I hope it helps!

One way a protein can gum up the works is by getting in the way of the normal version. This can happen because each protein has many different jobs.

Sometimes a broken protein can carry out one of its jobs just fine but it can't carry out its second job. When this happens, the broken protein gets in the way of normal proteins that are trying to do the second job.

Imagine a basketball team. Four of the players know how to catch and shoot the ball, but the fifth player only knows how to catch the ball -- she can't shoot it. Every time that fifth player catches the ball, the shot clock expires and the team loses possession of the ball. So even though there are four good players on the team, the fifth player (like the broken protein) prevents the team from winning.

This situation is called a dominant negative allele. An example of an allele like this sometimes happens in the p53 gene. The p53 protein is very important for making sure our cells don't grow too fast. Certain alleles have mistakes in their p53 gene so that the cells grow too fast and cause cancer.

p53 (see image to the right) works as a tetramer, meaning that four different p53 molecules have to stick to each other for the protein to do its job. Each p53 protein is like a member of the basketball team.

Some broken versions of p53 can bind other p53 molecules (catch the ball) but they can't carry out their normal job of making sure our cells don't grow too fast (shooting the ball). So the entire bunch of p53 proteins is ruined by the one bad protein. The broken p53 protein wins out, so it's dominant.

Another way a broken protein can be dominant is if it does something new, or does its usual thing at the wrong time. When a protein does something it shouldn't, it's called gain-of-function.

Let's go back to our basketball team. Just like before, we have 4 good players. This time, the fifth player shoots as soon as she gets the ball, no matter where she is on the court. So she almost always misses. By shooting at the wrong time, she makes the team lose.

Or imagine that the fifth player does something new. Every time she gets the ball, she drop-kicks it into the stands as if she's playing football. By using this new skill, she makes the team lose.

An example of a gain-of-function allele occurs in achondroplasia, or dwarfism. Dwarfism is caused by a broken version of the FGFR3 gene.

The normal job of FGFR3 is to prevent bone growth. The broken version of FGFR3 is hyperactive -- it tells bones to stop growing even when they should be growing. It's like the basketball player who shoots as soon as she gets the ball.

The hyperactive FGF3 protein causes a person's bones to be much shorter than normal. Even if a person has a normal copy of FGFR3 around, the broken version sends a signal that's just too strong, and since it wins out, it's called a dominant allele.

As you can see, there are lots of ways to get a dominant or a recessive allele. It all depends on the gene and what the difference in the DNA instructions does to the protein that gets made.

And we've only scratched the surface here! We haven't talked about some of the other ways you can get a dominant or recessive allele. Or how an allele can be dominant for one trait and recessive for another. Or traits that are codominant or incompletely dominant. And the list goes on . . .
 

GrindtooFilthy

World Class SuperVillain
Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
15,988
Reputation
3,042
Daps
42,942
Reppin
MA, CT, NH
Look at this dumb racist low self-esteem shyt right here

White people did not "evolve" from black people

You cannot "evolve" into genetic recessive traits smfh
White people are still Homo sapiens just like us, how did they evolved from us? Their even mixed in with neantherdal where we Have none? That ad mixture alone should tell you there’s something else going on. So where did the evolve from black people come in that you keep spouting
Typical ignorant person, who can't be challenged over facts without feeling personal attacks

you have offered nothing but you opinion, which you have backed up with nothing

if white people evolved from black people they would be a different species that what's evolution is and what you agreed to, and you contradicted yourself without even realizing it

just give it a rest lmao
you’re looking at it the wrong way.

dogs breeds came from other breeds and in turn evolved alongside wolves with a common ancestor

does that now make certain dog breeds more superior than others or even dogs more superior than wolves?

a mastiff and a kangal are both dogs but one came from a splintered lineage does that make the other superior?
 

ALonelyDad

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
74,112
Reputation
8,712
Daps
327,031
Journalism so lazy, making an actual article from reddit without proof lol
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,426
Reputation
3,327
Daps
53,919
Reppin
CALI
:umad:Not all of us look up to white daddy like you do

If you think that the european is a "better" version of you then thats your mental issue

Its factually incorrect though
Adaption to environments is evolution, that doesn't mean the species that evolved from the original is neccesarily "better".

White skin is more beneficial for living long term in cold places with less sun because it's easier to absorb sunlight in those environments, that's an evolution that's actually worse than the original because light skin is detrimental in any other environment.

Evolution isn't like pokemon.
 
Top