There is a definite separation between “southern” food and “soul” food. It’s a reach to have Anglo/Scottish derived white folks make a claim on some shyt that looks nothing like they’re native shyt for the most part. It’s a reach to have them claim it when Soul Food got look-a-like dishes in Africa, in non-Anglo countries in the diaspora, as well as Anglo parts of the diaspora with minimal white population.
Most Black folks and white folks(when they’re being honest) know the difference. When Soul Food was being defined in the 60’s those Southern whites he’s speaking on weren’t objecting because they didn’t fukk with it like that. Wasn’t no hipster foodie craze back then, the less they could be associated with our culture the better. Acting like Soul Food came about as a result of Black folks being overly militant is some revisionist bullshyt made by a nikka(Adrian Miller) signaling to white hipsters that they can get a pass.
Some of us try to add white folks into the equation out of shame for Soul Food, or when they want validation. I see right through that shyt.
“Bu bu but they eat it too, it isn’t just us”.
And honestly I think Soul Food is pretty safe from being gentrified. As far as I’m concerned they can make imitation chicken and waffles, hot chicken, mac and cheese, and shytty attempts at greens all they want.
I ain’t trippin because I know they’re not fukking with oxtails, neckbones, beef tips, chitlins, okra, black eyed peas, greens cooked properly, etc.
All we need to do is keep the boundaries defined and the recipes passed down.