How many championship titles....

Lefty Gunz

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,486
Reputation
2,853
Daps
51,152
I don't have a problem with there being two mid card titles. I think they should keep that way. Merge WWE and World Heavyweight and they're fine.
 

TRIPLE M

This is Where the Power Lies
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
6,576
Reputation
420
Daps
12,287
They also need some real tag teams. I need a bunch of teams who do creative tag team moves and dress alike and never wrestle alone.

yep..need real teams ..with names damn it


the glory years:wow:
killer-bees.jpg

britishbulldogs03.jpg

2267160217_7584906dd0.jpg

tumblr_m7fwcdpl8P1qkcqnjo1_500.jpg

rockers.jpg

Demolition.jpg

roadwarriors.jpg
 

luckyse7enz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
41,644
Reputation
7,340
Daps
120,904
Reppin
Detroit/Los Angeles
I don't have a problem with there being two mid card titles. I think they should keep that way. Merge WWE and World Heavyweight and they're fine.

Yep. Less is more. Two mid-card titles isn't bad but I used to like the "ladder" feel.

They also need some real tag teams. I need a bunch of teams who do creative tag team moves and dress alike and never wrestle alone.

Do most tag teams in the WWE even have TEAM finishers anymore? I feel like I haven't seen a good team finisher with a legitimate name in a while.
 

Golayitdown

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
24,468
Reputation
4,926
Daps
82,584
Yep. Less is more. Two mid-card titles isn't bad but I used to like the "ladder" feel.



Do most tag teams in the WWE even have TEAM finishers anymore? I feel like I haven't seen a good team finisher with a legitimate name in a while.


I can't remember the last time I've seen a legit tag finisher. I'm thinking maybe the 3D was the last one. The Usos might have one but they aren't used like that :snoop:
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,795
Reputation
975
Daps
106,197
Everyone's talking about adding this title or changing that one, modifying how they look. That's all well and good, but the larger issue far more in need of being addressed is how the WWE books and treats championships themselves, which is like shyt.

Just like the OP said, back in the day he was very invested in WCW's cruiserweight belt but didn't care about the lightweight championship in the WWF. Why? Because one had a great rotation of guys competing all the time, getting TV time, building rivalries. The other was treated as an insignificant afterthought. And sadly, that mentality has spread to every title in the company with the way the WWE books their belts and champions today.
 

Golayitdown

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
24,468
Reputation
4,926
Daps
82,584
Everyone's talking about adding this title or changing that one, modifying how they look. That's all well and good, but the larger issue far more in need of being addressed is how the WWE books and treats championships themselves, which is like shyt.

Just like the OP said, back in the day he was very invested in WCW's cruiserweight belt but didn't care about the lightweight championship in the WWF. Why? Because one had a great rotation of guys competing all the time, getting TV time, building rivalries. The other was treated as an insignificant afterthought. And sadly, that mentality has spread to every title in the company with the way the WWE books their belts and champions today.


I've been watching Raws from 99 and every one is like a damn PPV. Stacked from top to bottom with feuds and rivalries around each belt. And the show was only 2 hours.
 
Top