UpAndComing
Veteran
Capitalism isn’t the end all be all, for you to be so educated you would understand that
You have no idea what the 4 points I made in that post. Just admit it and move along
Capitalism isn’t the end all be all, for you to be so educated you would understand that
Your points only takes a small percentage of what actually happened but yet you come to the conclusion everybody should’ve been practicing capitalism to prevent a couple of European countries from colonizingYou have no idea what the 4 points I made in that post. Just admit it and move along
Your points only takes a small percentage of what actually happened but yet you come to the conclusion everybody should’ve been practicing capitalism to prevent a couple of European countries from colonizing
No that doesn’t make sense in the scheme of things
And you really didn’t explain your points you gave vague answers, stop trying to act like the smartest guy in the room like you know what you talking about you going to hurt yourself
You didn’t explain your argument well and never addressed what I wrote only dismissedIts vague because you don't understand it . How many times do I have to repeat this
You didn’t explain your argument well and never addressed what I wrote only dismissed
You don’t know what you talking about
Your deflectingYou didn't ask to explain it. I gave you 4 points. If you knew what I was talking about, you would know what questions to ask to explain my point, but you didn't. Just stop breh
Your deflecting
That’s just what they wanted people to believe. Mongols would send spies disguised as merchants and trade caravans into neighboring countries to learn the languages and culture, figure out what the political factions were, who was likely to flip sides, where your weak defenses were etc. Then once the information was secured the khan would have his delegates act outta pocket start talking shyt about how the great Khan was the master of the world and you had to submit or die. Naturally they would then be killed or imprisoned and the Mongols would say they broke non-existent international law and have a reason to invade.Is it tru that the mongols wanted establish a trade network and peaceful economic cooperation with the Arabs at first ? But their convoy was killed so they attacked baghdad?
Crazy how history works ..imagin if Muslims defeated France after controlling Spain
Would of a wrap for europe ..oh well
China tried that shyt before and got their monkey asses beat to Bolivia.Breh, the Chinese are racist af and they don’t have the decency to try and use dog whistles either
They'll probably stick to trading than traditional imperialism like EuropeChina tried that shyt before and got their monkey asses beat to Bolivia.
Chinese expansionism - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Probably all of Europe under caliphate
It was inevitable that some Old World power will go west. The desire for more trade is insatiable.
Are we saying that If the Muslims didn’t take over Constantinople, the Europeans may have had trade routes to Asia and there would be no need to go west to America ?
All facts.The Mongols destroyed their competition and allowed Europe access to Asian goods.
Before the Mongols Central Asia was arguably the center of civilization and you had to go through them, the Uzbeks, Khwarazmians, Kyivans, Pashtuns, Cumaks, Iranians, etc if you wanted to trade with China which itself was disunified so even if you got to China you had 3-4 kingdoms you had to deal with.
Mongols came through, destroyed all these kingdoms and massacred millions of people, united China under one emperor and basically took out the middle men that was preventing western Europeans from getting a sizeable return on trade.
That’s why the Silk Road is looked as this great thing and world changing event by Europeans because they weren’t effected by it and were able to profit from it as they could now travel freely to China and beyond gaining wealth. The Mongols just liked to receive tribute and be told how great they were and they both hated Islam so it was a win win. Meanwhile in Islamic, Eastern European and Central Asian sources it’s an apocalyptic event that they still haven’t recovered from.
Look up cities like Samarkand, Baghdad, Merv, Bukhara, Garanj before the Mongol conquests. They make Rome look like a pastoral village.
They had thousands of years to set up their societies that way and women in those kingdoms had kids with land owners and civil servants over generations. All it took was technology transfer for them to get back on top. Africans on the other hand need a revamping of theeir societies:The Europeans only came up in the 18th century after the Industrial Revolution and the massive exploitation of the Global South that followed.
However, their reign has come to an end.
Actually, this is going back to how things used to be in history. For thousands of years, China and India were the global superpowers.
Why didn't they just reverse engineer those guns and produce their own. One thing that always puzzles me about when Africans first met the Europeans is their appraoach. When the Japanese first met the Europeans they set up "Rangaku" throughout their country to reverse engineer a lot of the goods that Europeans were giving them. The japanese were able to reverse engineer the first guns that Europeans gave them to the point where they started making theeir own. This is actually why Europeans started trading "expertise" instead down the line. They couldnt just sell trinkets like guns to the Japanese anymore. This would all lead to the japanese basically industrializing in basically 30 years (1860 to 1890). Now why did Africans just trade without thought? Native Americans and other indiginous groups did the same.... Just traded with the Euros yet didnt reverse engineer.Yes, very true. The Anglo-Ashanti wars are a good example. Only after Britain had undergone the Second Industrial Revolution, distilled quinine, did they have a chance - even with their Fante/Hausa lackeys.