How Europe Stole The World

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,150
Reputation
572
Daps
16,460
You have no idea what the 4 points I made in that post. Just admit it and move along
Your points only takes a small percentage of what actually happened but yet you come to the conclusion everybody should’ve been practicing capitalism to prevent a couple of European countries from colonizing
No that doesn’t make sense in the scheme of things
And you really didn’t explain your points you gave vague answers, stop trying to act like the smartest guy in the room like you know what you talking about you going to hurt yourself
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
64,555
Reputation
15,740
Daps
282,857
Your points only takes a small percentage of what actually happened but yet you come to the conclusion everybody should’ve been practicing capitalism to prevent a couple of European countries from colonizing
No that doesn’t make sense in the scheme of things
And you really didn’t explain your points you gave vague answers, stop trying to act like the smartest guy in the room like you know what you talking about you going to hurt yourself

Its vague because you don't understand it :pachaha:. How many times do I have to repeat this
 

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,150
Reputation
572
Daps
16,460
Its vague because you don't understand it :pachaha:. How many times do I have to repeat this
You didn’t explain your argument well and never addressed what I wrote only dismissed
You don’t know what you talking about
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
64,555
Reputation
15,740
Daps
282,857
You didn’t explain your argument well and never addressed what I wrote only dismissed
You don’t know what you talking about


You didn't ask to explain it. I gave you 4 points. If you knew what I was talking about, you would know what questions to ask to explain my point, but you didn't. Just stop breh :pachaha:
 

Mister Terrific

It’s in the name
Bushed
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
5,265
Reputation
1,458
Daps
18,917
Reppin
Michigan
Is it tru that the mongols wanted establish a trade network and peaceful economic cooperation with the Arabs at first ? But their convoy was killed so they attacked baghdad?


Crazy how history works ..imagin if Muslims defeated France after controlling Spain

Would of a wrap for europe ..oh well
That’s just what they wanted people to believe. Mongols would send spies disguised as merchants and trade caravans into neighboring countries to learn the languages and culture, figure out what the political factions were, who was likely to flip sides, where your weak defenses were etc. Then once the information was secured the khan would have his delegates act outta pocket start talking shyt about how the great Khan was the master of the world and you had to submit or die. Naturally they would then be killed or imprisoned and the Mongols would say they broke non-existent international law and have a reason to invade.

If it was a one off thing I would say the emperors fukked up but Mongol delegates were constantly being executed when they traveled to other kingdoms and the Mongols would magically be fully prepared for warfare with thousands of troops stationed at the border and know all the secret passes and where the major cities were located. That lets you know it was a designed operation.

It was actually Europes disunity, feudalism and backwardness during this time that hurt the Mongols when they tried to invade. The Mongols were used to going in making the emperor run away and/or capturing and killing the emperor and the entire system would collapse. Europe however did not have one emperor they had dozens and those emperors had hundreds of lords who all ruled their own petty fiefdoms and they were constantly fighting each other.

You actually see this when the Mongols invaded Hungary. They won a big battle at Mohi and killed most of the royal army and forced the emperor to run away but they found themselves having to capture dozens of castles each with their own little lord. So the mongols sat around waiting for someone to come and say they surrender and pledge fealty to the great Khan but nobody came as the concept of national identity didn’t exist like it did in China or the Middle East. I think at best they would’ve destroyed Vienna but after that the terrain and political systems would have been too much to overcome especially with no dependable supply lines.



If not for the Mongols taking out the Islamic and Chinese empires I think Europe stays a backwater for a little while longer. But something about the European mindset. That merchant trader mindset that the Chinese, Indians and Africans hated and the Muslim’s tolerated. Just imagine getting on a boat, traveling thousands of miles on the open ocean, landing on an island and immediately start stabbing defenseless natives who didn’t even know what war was. That’s a being who was never bred to live harmoniously with its environment



TLDR: Mongols would use merchants and traders to plot invasions; they would’ve struggled to conquer Europe because it was just a bunch of petty fiefdoms. European greed and lack of scruples would’ve likely saw them dominate the world eventually anyway.
 

JadeB

la force de l'avenir
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Messages
9,026
Reputation
-899
Daps
28,514
:wow:
Are we saying that If the Muslims didn’t take over Constantinople, the Europeans may have had trade routes to Asia and there would be no need to go west to America ?
It was inevitable that some Old World power will go west. The desire for more trade is insatiable.
 

yung Herbie Hancock

Funkadelic Parliament
Bushed
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
7,168
Reputation
-2,451
Daps
21,579
Reppin
California
The Mongols destroyed their competition and allowed Europe access to Asian goods.

Before the Mongols Central Asia was arguably the center of civilization and you had to go through them, the Uzbeks, Khwarazmians, Kyivans, Pashtuns, Cumaks, Iranians, etc if you wanted to trade with China which itself was disunified so even if you got to China you had 3-4 kingdoms you had to deal with.

Mongols came through, destroyed all these kingdoms and massacred millions of people, united China under one emperor and basically took out the middle men that was preventing western Europeans from getting a sizeable return on trade.

That’s why the Silk Road is looked as this great thing and world changing event by Europeans because they weren’t effected by it and were able to profit from it as they could now travel freely to China and beyond gaining wealth. The Mongols just liked to receive tribute and be told how great they were and they both hated Islam so it was a win win. Meanwhile in Islamic, Eastern European and Central Asian sources it’s an apocalyptic event that they still haven’t recovered from.


Look up cities like Samarkand, Baghdad, Merv, Bukhara, Garanj before the Mongol conquests. They make Rome look like a pastoral village.
All facts.
 

yung Herbie Hancock

Funkadelic Parliament
Bushed
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
7,168
Reputation
-2,451
Daps
21,579
Reppin
California
The Europeans only came up in the 18th century after the Industrial Revolution and the massive exploitation of the Global South that followed.

However, their reign has come to an end.

dY2YYK1_etsfcFyNx65KUUwgwOCsYUWS-4_Yd2ppnHg.jpg



Actually, this is going back to how things used to be in history. For thousands of years, China and India were the global superpowers.
They had thousands of years to set up their societies that way and women in those kingdoms had kids with land owners and civil servants over generations. All it took was technology transfer for them to get back on top. Africans on the other hand need a revamping of theeir societies:

1) Get rid of tribalism
2) prioritize smart men having kids regardless of what tribe hes from. You do that through capitalism tbh. Later down the road once the countries are industrialized you can implement more socialism.
3) make education compulsory
4) give the talented an incentive to improve your society and make it safe for them to stick around. Africa's brain drain is the worst in the world. All these Nigerian engineers, STEM scientists and doctors in the west have expertise that they could take back with them
5) gotta attract foreign investments by making africa safer.
6) Africans gotta stop falling for divide and rule. It's the #1 reason why things are the way itt is. Some random French guy shows up and gives you money to overthrow your government? You better say no.
7) increase literacy rates and get rod of superstitions.

These are just the first steps before industrializing.
 

yung Herbie Hancock

Funkadelic Parliament
Bushed
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
7,168
Reputation
-2,451
Daps
21,579
Reppin
California
Yes, very true. The Anglo-Ashanti wars are a good example. Only after Britain had undergone the Second Industrial Revolution, distilled quinine, did they have a chance - even with their Fante/Hausa lackeys.
Why didn't they just reverse engineer those guns and produce their own. One thing that always puzzles me about when Africans first met the Europeans is their appraoach. When the Japanese first met the Europeans they set up "Rangaku" throughout their country to reverse engineer a lot of the goods that Europeans were giving them. The japanese were able to reverse engineer the first guns that Europeans gave them to the point where they started making theeir own. This is actually why Europeans started trading "expertise" instead down the line. They couldnt just sell trinkets like guns to the Japanese anymore. This would all lead to the japanese basically industrializing in basically 30 years (1860 to 1890). Now why did Africans just trade without thought? Native Americans and other indiginous groups did the same.... Just traded with the Euros yet didnt reverse engineer.

The only exception to this I think was Idris Alooma's empire. They were getting close to producing their own guns but their arab "brothers in islam" attacked them before they could perfect it.
 
Top