Born2BKing
Veteran
Obama is running against himself for the most part. He will either win this or lose this on his own. Mitt is Mitt and will not have any policies or programs or plans. He is just basically the guy who isn't Obama.
I agree with the 2nd part.Two reasons -
1. I'm not really sure why, but Democrats (and most liberals in positions of power) seem to inherently be puzzies. They're too busy being scared that FOX news will say something bad about them to ever call out Republicans on anything. Obama is a prime example of this.
2. The Republican base is too busy blindly hating Obama to pay much attention to Romney. The GOP could just pick a name from a phonebook and stick an "R" next to it and the base would support whoever it was just for not being Obama. These are people that honestly think Obama is a Muslim/Socialist/Marxist that wants to destroy America. I've listed to right-wing talk radio and they literally think Obama is the 2nd coming of Hitler.
Are people just seriously burying their head in the sand and pretending like they don't see it?
dude says the blind trust is a ruse then says the blind trust handles all his foreign account money.
he was pro-choice then pro-life then he said he doesn't have anything in his agenda on the issue then said he wants to overturn Roe vs Wade.
he shyts on damn near half the country and says they'll never take responsibility for themselves and he basically don't give a fukk about them then comes back and cares about 100% of the population in the US.
i've never seen a candidate shift positions so frequently during a campaign and not get called out on it. do his supporters even know his real positions on anything or is this one of those i'm a republican he's the candidate so i support that deals?
how can you believe in a person that doesn't take a consistent stand for anything? he's damn near making a mockery of all his supporters by flip flopping right in their faces then doing it again.
Two reasons -
1. I'm not really sure why, but Democrats (and most liberals in positions of power) seem to inherently be puzzies. They're too busy being scared that FOX news will say something bad about them to ever call out Republicans on anything. Obama is a prime example of this.
2. The Republican base is too busy blindly hating Obama to pay much attention to Romney. The GOP could just pick a name from a phonebook and stick an "R" next to it and the base would support whoever it was just for not being Obama. These are people that honestly think Obama is a Muslim/Socialist/Marxist that wants to destroy America. I've listed to right-wing talk radio and they literally think Obama is the 2nd coming of Hitler.
I think what he means is that when a public figure lies to the public, they are generally called out on it and judged. The general populace doesn't like being lied to and they will generally behave very abrasive to people who are seen as blatant liars.what is this "getting away with it" narrative? there's been adds, flip-flop memes, and all types of media pointing out his contradictions
I think what he means is that when a public figure lies to the public, they are generally called out on it and judged. The general populace doesn't like being lied to and they will generally behave very abrasive to people who are seen as blatant liars.
For example (and NO I'm not comparing him to a child molester use your head people) when Sandusky was accused of being a kid toucher, the public sloshed around their drink in their hands for a bit and then when the mountain of evidence was presented it was like ok dude stop it you're a fukking kid toucher and you need to be sent to prison.
With Romney there are a number of falsified statements, flip flops, position changes, yet certain polls are STILL in favor of this man, running for the highest position in this country.
I don't think there's anyone (I mean I'm sure there's like a handful of close friends or morons) that think Sandusky is innocent, but there is an alarming and if the polls are to be believed, an increasing number of people who despite the clear evidence, STILL support Romney in his current endeavors.
why do you think?
Because hes a white republican and whites want obama to lose.
I think what he means is that when a public figure lies to the public, they are generally called out on it and judged. The general populace doesn't like being lied to and they will generally behave very abrasive to people who are seen as blatant liars.
For example (and NO I'm not comparing him to a child molester use your head people) when Sandusky was accused of being a kid toucher, the public sloshed around their drink in their hands for a bit and then when the mountain of evidence was presented it was like ok dude stop it you're a fukking kid toucher and you need to be sent to prison.
With Romney there are a number of falsified statements, flip flops, position changes, yet certain polls are STILL in favor of this man, running for the highest position in this country.
I don't think there's anyone (I mean I'm sure there's like a handful of close friends or morons) that think Sandusky is innocent, but there is an alarming and if the polls are to be believed, an increasing number of people who despite the clear evidence, STILL support Romney in his current endeavors.