Oh, I say it indirectly? What about all those pos reps and daps I got for your bytch ass when I said Israel had the right to defend itself in their previous wars. That sound like I want them to be murdered and steam rolled. The only one introducing any fallacies is yourself.
Another "if you Criticize Israel and Zionists you're an anti-Semite white supremacists" shot? Is that your only line of argument?
They violated treaties involving international waters. They killed an American citizen that was not armed.
No, not all criticism of Israel is the equivalent of
1) Israel did not violate a single treaty in international waters. In fact,
it is 100% legal to board a ship in international waters if the ship is a) suspected of breaching a blockade, or b) suspected of having weapons. This ship had a bunch of Jihadists carrying knives and molotov cocktails singing songs about the genocide of Jews and they openly admitted their goal was to breach Israel's blockade and commit Jihad.
2) He was unarmed according to you, someone who routinely defames the Jewish state (but doesn't defame other states).
Do you have evidence that Israel shot him while he was unarmed?
3) Criticizing Israel does not make one anti-Semitic, holding double standards against it while using traditional European anti-Semitic rhetoric (i.e dual loyalty canard)
is.
88m3/TLOL, you need to try harder breh.
What do you argue when American Jews themselves make the case for "Israel-firsters"? Do you call them anti-semetic and end your argument as well?
They don't. That's the thing.
I mean, you can't blame me for thinking your both the same poster.
I suppose I can't blame you for thinking we're the same person, in much the same way I can't blame one of my autistic students for punching himself in the face repeatedly. Me and 88M3 have completely different posting styles.
