The economic inequality is a counter argument, like she said.So no counter argument ?![]()


Last edited:
The economic inequality is a counter argument, like she said.So no counter argument ?![]()
No it wouldn’t fool.The two aren't linked. If anything a lack of resources would lead to slenderness. Take a trip outside the west.
The economic inequality is a counter argument, like she said.
The problem is your lack of comprehension. If those in poverty don’t have the money or resources for fresh food and vegetarian style meals that contribute to healthy eating habits; do you honestly think they’re going to turn down a $4.00 value meal from Burger King and would rather starve ?? Foh. “Oh let me not eat today bc I can’t afford a shrimp and broccoli protein salad..”
![]()
No it wouldn’t fool.Take a trip outside your house. Dammit you must like to sound stupid on purpose.
Poor quality foods have higher sodium content, massive amount of sugar substances, heavy fat and whatever byproducts that are put in - why the fuk do you think there’s a Popeyes and McDonald’s on every other block offering deals of the day. And why do you think snack foods, chips and sugar cereals are always on some 2 for $5 , or bogo deal. People in poverty choose quality over quantity. Stock up as much as they can so that it lasts for the longest amount of time. The idea is to eat fresh vegetables, but they stay making canned veggies cheaper to buy. All that is designed to fill you up quick so that you FEEL full while it’s wreaking havoc on the digestive system and metabolism. They make the natural peanut butter, straight up peanuts with no added hfcs twice as expensive as the regular peanut butter with all the added sugar and salt .