Honestly..America needs a business man as president

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,869
Reppin
Behind You
more like a scientist or an engineer


neg pending

I doubt we will ever get a person of science just because they would not be able to pull off the slick shyster shyt in speeches like a lawyer or businessman cna when campaigning. A scinetis or engineer would be too cerebral for the average voter to "connect" with because they wouldn't be serving up platitudes and catchy slogans every time they opened their mouth.
 

teacher

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,918
Reputation
-432
Daps
7,316
exactly. whats good for a business doesn't equate to whats good for a country. micro vs macro economics. we need a fukkin economist for a president, not a politician

:snoop:

you realize businesses do what they do because of the teachings of economics

:ufdup:

we need a communist as president to redistribute the wealth by force if necessary :birdman:
 

AV Dicey

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,595
Reputation
0
Daps
3,236
Reppin
Juan Roberto's bald spot
That nickname was funny because GW hadn't actually successfully run a gotdamn thing in his career as a businessman.
Are you claiming that he did not succesfully run the "1st place Texas Rangers" with luminaries such as 'pudge', Raffy and fan favorite Juando to the top of the baseball mountain whilst retroactivley applying the 2012 republican campaign theme to publicy fund the buliding of The Ballpark at Arlington?
 

filial_piety

Banned
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
11,107
Reputation
-2,760
Daps
27,460
Reppin
I95S
I doubt we will ever get a person of science just because they would not be able to pull off the slick shyster shyt in speeches like a lawyer or businessman cna when campaigning. A scinetis or engineer would be too cerebral for the average voter to "connect" with because they wouldn't be serving up platitudes and catchy slogans every time they opened their mouth.

All true, however technocrats have never really been "people" persons and are essentially about the bottomline albeit in another way. Much like a business person, they are about maximizing efficiency and calculations. It never really panned out with them in the Soviet Union.

The closest people that I can think of that came from a STEM background was Ron Paul who was a physician, and Herman Cain who majored in mathematics and was employed in ballistics with a degree in Comp Sci (both Republicans btw).


Aside from that I'd like to see some regular people running the country for a change both in the Presidency, Congress and in the Cabinets. Seems like it's run by stuffed shirt sherry drinking Hah-vad graduates and Yalies who are career politicians. The last President with a regular degree was Regan who was a graduate of Eureka College.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,912
Daps
120,869
Reppin
Behind You
Aside from that I'd like to see some regular people running the country for a change both in the Presidency, Congress and in the Cabinets. Seems like it's run by stuffed shirt sherry drinking Hah-vad graduates and Yalies who are career politicians. The last President with a regular degree was Regan who was a graduate of Eureka College.

The electorate though is quick to clown a "regular" person nowadays. If a candidate doesn't come from one of the Ivy League schools then they will be immediately painted as "uneducated" or "not educated enough" by the media and in turn will be dismissed by the voting public.
 

filial_piety

Banned
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
11,107
Reputation
-2,760
Daps
27,460
Reppin
I95S
The electorate though is quick to clown a "regular" person nowadays. If a candidate doesn't come from one of the Ivy League schools then they will be immediately painted as "uneducated" or "not educated enough" by the media and in turn will be dismissed by the voting public.

Yeah I could see that, funny enough it doesn't even seem as if the ivy name brand alone will make you Presidential. If you don't have Harvard, Princeton or Yale mounted on your wall you can basically forget it. Darmouth, Brown and Cornell still get the :rudy: look while Columbia and UPENN get the :ld:
 

Habit

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
820
Reputation
10
Daps
270
I doubt we will ever get a person of science just because they would not be able to pull off the slick shyster shyt in speeches like a lawyer or businessman cna when campaigning. A scinetis or engineer would be too cerebral for the average voter to "connect" with because they wouldn't be serving up platitudes and catchy slogans every time they opened their mouth.

Engineers and scientis probably hate politics more than religion.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,024
Reputation
4,716
Daps
66,876
The electorate though is quick to clown a "regular" person nowadays. If a candidate doesn't come from one of the Ivy League schools then they will be immediately painted as "uneducated" or "not educated enough" by the media and in turn will be dismissed by the voting public.

Yeah I could see that, funny enough it doesn't even seem as if the ivy name brand alone will make you Presidential. If you don't have Harvard, Princeton or Yale mounted on your wall you can basically forget it. Darmouth, Brown and Cornell still get the :rudy: look while Columbia and UPENN get the :ld:

What kind of fake ass world do you guys live in? Harvard and Yale may dominate the highest office, but that's because those two schools basically run DC anyway.

If anything, the electorate has been anti-academic for a minute. They've wanted the "guy you can have a beer with." :childplease:

What's more ridiculous is that you guys want someone to win just because they didn't go to an ivy. Obama and Romney are both ivy-educated --> nothing alike. Bush --> ivy educated, still got clowned for not being bright.

Did John McCain go to Harvard or Yale? :childplease:

BTW, the Solicitor General and Attorney General both went to Columbia so I don't know about that school getting :childplease: by anyone. BTW, who was the last person from Princeton to get elected? What in the world are you talking about?
 

YBE

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
5,125
Reputation
9
Daps
5,513
exactly. whats good for a business doesn't equate to whats good for a country. micro vs macro economics. we need a fukkin economist for a president, not a politician

Economics major :win:
 

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,383
Reputation
-411
Daps
10,406
Yup.

tumblr_m9gd7kka5V1qfvso1o1_r1_250.gif
tumblr_m9gd7kka5V1qfvso1o2_r1_250.gif

tumblr_m9gd7kka5V1qfvso1o3_r2_500.gif

Breh it's a coincidence you posted Neil DeGrassi Tyson.

I believe he could be a great politician/scientist.

He's such a great speaker. Has great charisma.

That man's my hero :to:
 

Mr Uncle Leroy

All Star
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
10,364
Reputation
-170
Daps
4,625
look at mitt romneys business history...he turn a lot of companies into debt tankers, taking over management and the companies never became tough to get out of the debt...but in the due process, mitt got rich, but most of the companies/concept failed
 
Top