thats actually not true. their record with [redacted] 9-12, and with him, it is 32-26. this would b the 3rd season in a row we have proof that the warriors are far more competitive w/o [Redacted]. to answer
@Ohene 's question a few pages ago, we have statistical data and proof for 3 straight seasons that the warriors are noticeably better when [redacted] doesn't touch the court. You can point to klay, poole, and wiggins, but they actually contributed.
the same way the 2021 warriors played as well as a 4 seed w/o him and ended up a play-in team because Looney didnt start that year in favor of [redacted], they are much better this season without, as well.
We already agreed as a group that they arent contenders this year.
But they are more competitive w/o him, which is what you want when you have an aging Steph/Klay/Draymond core. For all the issues that were listed with this team, they are playing as well as the 5 seed if you remove that 10 game experiment where [Redacted] was getting 20+ mins. Again those 10 games sunk us.He was the 4th highest paid guy on the team and easily the most expendable when you consider the salary and how bad he was as a rookie.
No one wants to acknowledge the opportunity cost of keeping him and playing him as much as we did. They avoid that argument and make the strawman that the warriors are supposed to be contenders now that he's gone
So if you agree that:
1. The warriors should have traded him after the deadline and used his 9million dollar salary+the 3 picks in the 2022 draft to bolster the bench. (it hurts even more when you consider the Lakers turned their entire season around by trading Russ, 1 FRP, and 3 Second rounders get Vando, Beasley, Dlo, and Hachimura)
2. Not doing that, and drafting more useless rookies (including giving a guaranteed 3 year deal to a guy with a jones fracture),
3. letting GP2 walk (a guy who was closing in the NBA finals) to keep [Redacted]
4. the warriors are actually playing MUCH better (statistically and record-wise) now that he's gone
i dont see what the disagreement is about