You talking to people that actually have real life knowledge and experience about American Hip Hop. You are not some type of authority to state sh!t like you are definitively stating sh!t about Hip Hop culture in America. You like one of them n!ggas that been around a dude or two that been in the penitentiary and now all of a sudden you think you know what the fukk really be going on in the pen. You're an outsider telling insiders about what they actually experienced or know.
And how can it be considered "blasphemous" to like an album full of excellent/classic tracks more than another one just because it has one track that isn't up to par? Do you know what blasphemous means? You act like nikkas is trying to say I Am is better than Illmatic.
If only you bothered to read anything I say carefully you wouldn't be regurgitating the same stuff.
I said to you based on the TITLE of the video including the word 'blasphemy' it would be considered blasphemous to put IWW over Illmatic. I said somewhere else in this thread that in reality it is not a blasphemous thought, but only according to the words used in the video i.e. hip-hop blasphemy: IWW > Illmatic. Is it blasphemous or not? There's no in between. That's how I interpreted and answered it. And my answer is yes....because I think Illmatic is better. Of course it isn't REALLY blasphemous. And I said this shyt two, three times....but you don't hear me doe.
As for the bold, well I guess that's kinda like how Nas was pretending he was in the midst of the street action whilst scribbling shyt in his notepad with a window view, right? (that's a joke btw before you get riled up for no reason...)
I did not claim to be an authority I am offering up an opinion like everyone else in this thread. You've only taken issue with me when it comes to Nas. When I big up Wu-Tang, you either remain silent or you support my viewpoint. We all have preferences. Just accept the fact I don't like Nas as much as you and move on.
