Higher Learning Worst Poster of the Year Award

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Anyway, just because you typed 7000 words of emotional bullshyt doesn't mean that ur opinion is more valid than actual scientist and people nominated for medical and scientific positions in our society.

I posted nothing but scientific peer-reviewed rebuttals gathered for over 60 years to EVERY objection raised in that thread, not my opinions. The scientists' conclusions I posted are INFINITELY more valid than your bullshyt attempt to downplay how badly your objection was destroyed along with that fakkit LeyeT's.

I'm done being 'nice' to imbeciles and morons. You wanna discuss things rationally, fine. You wanna act like a retard impersonating a critical thinker and believe lies rather than actual evidence, I'll smash the life outta you and won't give a flying fukk about your feelings.

Put up or shut up.

Muhammad was a kid-touching liar.​

 

[Kritic]

i'm waiting on these polls to go up like it's cyber monday.but they don't wanna put them up cause their homie ain't looking good.

as we wait for them let me tell you niccas about my day...


so i just finished watching this movie lincoln and i can't believe how these niccas just distorted history with lies. there must be a thread about that movie. i don't watch movies and watch movies years after release. there really needs to be a thread about this movie. i just really want to see what you niccas post about it.

do yall watch these movies just for entertainment or are they taken serious


i shoulda known when a jewish cac like speilberg directs a movie it's nothing but lies anyway. i can't believe i gave that nicca 2hrs of my life.

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

It's a shame people are nominating @88m3 ... if you don't get him by now you've missed the point of this entire sub forum

@DEAD7 isn't bad at all he's just someone who has alternate views... totally healthy

@TLOL is back doesn't post enough to be the worst but aside from his insane support of Israel I think his subtle racism is what's most annoying

@[B]Kritic[/B] @Slang I dont even read their posts at all, someone give me a hall of fame breakdown of their worst posts, and I will pass judgement

See page 12

 

[Blackking]

I posted nothing but scientific peer-reviewed rebuttals gathered for over 60 years to EVERY objection raised in that thread, not my opinions. The scientists' conclusions I posted are INFINITELY more valid than your bullshyt attempt to downplay how badly your objection was destroyed along with that fakkit LeyeT's.

I'm done being 'nice' to imbeciles and morons. You wanna discuss things rationally, fine. You wanna act like a retard impersonating a critical thinker and believe lies rather than actual evidence, I'll smash the life outta you and won't give a flying fukk about your feelings.

Put up or shut up.

Muhammad was a kid-touching liar.​

Somebody must have pissed u off in real life or something

You didn't have a good kill natives holiday w your friends and family? -- you didn't get to enjoy that good food in shyt??


So now we are supposed to take- YOU crying on ur keyboard cussing and fussin n shyt, lol as the reason y people should listen to your opinion on which scientist are more valid than others


I don't know what Muhammad did in his personal life. I just pray to Allah, Jesus, Brahman, Buddah, and even Octopus Elephants that you never get the chance to "smash the life out of me "

 

[LionofJudah]

90% of you posters in this section are a$$holes anyway, and unless someone is kissing the ass of a CAC scientists in an article, their opinion isn't valid. Make me the worst poster, I could care less. The sheer fact that this is even something that is done proves this section has no more 'higher learning' than Just Buggin Out.

 

[Kritic]

yo i was just going through my nsa type archives (since sohh) of all you niccas and i see i confused barnone with broke wave.
sorry in this confusion i threw you in with those fakkits.

but if the damage already been done we can just carry on fighting. doesn't matter to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



edit: sorry for the confusion. barnone changed name to candor. i get it now. beef is still on no apology.

why you niccas change names and aliases. what for

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You didn't have a good kill natives holiday w your friends and family? -- you didn't get to enjoy that good food in shyt??

I don't celebrate holidays. Waste of time.​

So now we are supposed to take- YOU crying on ur keyboard cussing and fussin n shyt, lol as the reason y people should listen to your opinion on which scientist are more valid than others

Ain't nobody 'crying'. You take the actual EVIDENCE I posted from scientists that have been peer-reviewed (not cherry-picked) and withstood scrutiny as more valid than others.

The bullshyt you posted wasn't valid and was destroyed by actual scientific evidence gathered for over 60 years.
​

I don't know what Muhammad did in his personal life.

Yes, you do. He fukked a little girl and gave new meaning to the word 'RAM-adan'......
You follow a murdering, lying, plagiarizing, cross-dressing pedophile.
​

 

[Blackking]

I don't celebrate holidays. Waste of time.​

Ain't nobody 'crying'. You take the actual EVIDENCE I posted from scientists that have been peer-reviewed (not cherry-picked) and withstood scrutiny as more valid than others.

The bullshyt you posted wasn't valid and was destroyed by actual scientific evidence gathered for over 60 years.
​

Yes, you do. He fukked a little girl. You pray to a murdering, lying, plagiarizing pedophile.​

So basically your family sucks.... and/or your a loser who they do not associate with. I don't celebrate holidays either - but everyone is off work, and people are around so fukk it.

IDK man, you sounded like u had tears and snot running down ur face when u were addressing @ Leteye - Angry yet passionate, like u wanted to rape that nikka or something.



I have over 35 sites to link u too to discuss your believe that everything peer reviewed and mainstream = truth (of course until it's corrected ) But I will just leave u w one lil article because it doesn't go into too much detail....

A few years ago scientists at Amgen, an American drug company, tried to replicate 53 studies that they considered landmarks in the basic science of cancer, often co-operating closely with the original researchers to ensure that their experimental technique matched the one used first time round. According to a piece they wrote last year in Nature, a leading scientific journal, they were able to reproduce the original results in just six. Months earlier Florian Prinz and his colleagues at Bayer HealthCare, a German pharmaceutical giant, reported in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, a sister journal, that they had successfully reproduced the published results in just a quarter of 67 seminal studies.
The governments of the OECD, a club of mostly rich countries, spent $59 billion on biomedical research in 2012, nearly double the figure in 2000. One of the justifications for this is that basic-science results provided by governments form the basis for private drug-development work. If companies cannot rely on academic research, that reasoning breaks down. When an official at America’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) reckons, despairingly, that researchers would find it hard to reproduce at least three-quarters of all published biomedical findings, the public part of the process seems to have failed.

Academic scientists readily acknowledge that they often get things wrong. But they also hold fast to the idea that these errors get corrected over time as other scientists try to take the work further. Evidence that many more dodgy results are published than are subsequently corrected or withdrawn calls that much-vaunted capacity for self-correction into question. There are errors in a lot more of the scientific papers being published, written about and acted on than anyone would normally suppose, or like to think.

Various factors contribute to the problem. Statistical mistakes are widespread. The peer reviewers who evaluate papers before journals commit to publishing them are much worse at spotting mistakes than they or others appreciate. Professional pressure, competition and ambition push scientists to publish more quickly than would be wise. A career structure which lays great stress on publishing copious papers exacerbates all these problems. “There is no cost to getting things wrong,” says Brian Nosek, a psychologist at the University of Virginia who has taken an interest in his discipline’s persistent errors. “The cost is not getting them published.”

First, the statistics, which if perhaps off-putting are quite crucial. Scientists divide errors into two classes. A type I error is the mistake of thinking something is true when it is not (also known as a “false positive”). A type II error is thinking something is not true when in fact it is (a “false negative”). When testing a specific hypothesis, scientists run statistical checks to work out how likely it would be for data which seem to support the idea to have come about simply by chance. If the likelihood of such a false-positive conclusion is less than 5%, they deem the evidence that the hypothesis is true “statistically significant”. They are thus accepting that one result in 20 will be falsely positive—but one in 20 seems a satisfactorily low rate.

Understanding insignificance

In 2005 John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist from Stanford University, caused a stir with a paper showing why, as a matter of statistical logic, the idea that only one such paper in 20 gives a false-positive result was hugely optimistic. Instead, he argued, “most published research findings are probably false.” As he told the quadrennial International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, held this September in Chicago, the problem has not gone away.

This fits with another line of evidence suggesting that a lot of scientific research is poorly thought through, or executed, or both. The peer-reviewers at a journal like Nature provide editors with opinions on a paper’s novelty and significance as well as its shortcomings. But some new journals—PLoS One, published by the not-for-profit Public Library of Science, was the pioneer—make a point of being less picky. These “minimal-threshold” journals, which are online-only, seek to publish as much science as possible, rather than to pick out the best. They thus ask their peer reviewers only if a paper is methodologically sound. Remarkably, almost half the submissions to PLoS One are rejected for failing to clear that seemingly low bar.

 

[No1]

yo i was just going through my nsa type archives (since sohh) of all you niccas and i see i confused barnone with broke wave.
sorry in this confusion i threw you in with those fakkits.

but if the damage already been done we can just carry on fighting. doesn't matter to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



edit: sorry for the confusion. barnone changed name to candor. i get it now. beef is still on no apology.

why you niccas change names and aliases. what for

I don't have "beef" with anyone on this site. There are about 3 or 4 people who have a problem with me at all times, but otherwise, I can care less. I don't even read your posts enough to have beef with you, but HL seems to not fukk with you

@acri1 you guys really want a best poster thread, can I get a consensus on this

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

So basically your family sucks.... and/or your a loser who they do not associate with.

My family's in Alabama. I'm not. Your logic sucks and you live in Detroit.

Y'all celebrate not getting shot.​

IDK man, you sounded like

So now sound is transmitted through text......​

I have over 35 sites to link u too

But you don't know the difference between 'to' and 'too' and that article has NOTHING to do with fluoride which has been studied for over 60 years and has thousands of peer-reviewed articles/studies to support it.

Perhaps you should wear a dress like your Prophet-for-Profit to see where because you just said a whole lot of nothing.​

 

[Kritic]

I don't have "beef" with anyone on this site. There are about 3 or 4 people who have a problem with me at all times, but otherwise, I can care less. I don't even read your posts enough to have beef with you, but HL seems to not fukk with you

@acri1 you guys really want a best poster thread, can I get a consensus on this

i dont have beef with broke wave. i confused your name with his. where do you get hl don't fuq with me? your boyfriend vic? i didnt even know you existed. there's some niccas i'll never like from sohh like your boyfriend. and if you are his girlfriend then it's just automatic for me. and my beef with you started when you started it with me. i can understand broke wave being all with me cause of the confusion of names.

but your boyfriend his got this thing of shaping you ppls minds on ppl. he does it with ppl he doesn't agree with and starts with making threads about them. like who even does that. that sh1t really blows my mind. and you are pretty much a goner to me. and i'll put you in the same box as him cause you come out and defend 88. that sh1t really blows my mind considering you're an admin.
you've made a conscious choice to ignore other users on this site and defend him.

so i can understand from your point of view as admin you dont want to 'publicly' make things personal with users. but but for me i cant pretend and don't agree with the way you do your job.

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

I don't have "beef" with anyone on this site. There are about 3 or 4 people who have a problem with me at all times, but otherwise, I can care less. I don't even read your posts enough to have beef with you, but HL seems to not fukk with you

@acri1 you guys really want a best poster thread, can I get a consensus on this

Im in favor.

 

[Kritic]

'RAM-adan'......

speaking of ram i just got 32gb memory for my comp.

and using ramdisk. the benches are lookin very good.

 

[Blackking]

My family's in Alabama. I'm in NJ. Your logic sucks.​

So now sound is transmitted through text......​

But you don't know the difference between 'to' and 'too' and that article has NOTHING to do with fluoride which has been studied for over 60 years and has thousands of peer-reviewed articles/studies to support it.

Perhaps you should wear a dress like your Prophet-for-Profit to see where because you just said a whole lot of nothing.​

well I travel a lot, so your logic sucks.... and my fam came up from Atlanta to Detroit.

Sound may not transmit through text, but bytchassness does and we all know what that sounds like.

If you can't see that fluoride studies fall under the same standards of everything I just posted , then I can't help you. You are in denial. If u go back, I never really supported either side of the fluoride debate...... I go hardest at ur side because It more shamelessly leans on the fake ass Appeal to authority fallacies than almost anything I've ever been a witness to.
Your blind faith is just as crazy as all these scary Muslims out here--- You really believe the shyt ur saying.

 

[Blackking]

speaking of ram i just got 32gb memory for my comp.

and using ramdisk. the benches are lookin very good.

what was ur screen name on sohh