murksiderock
Superstar
Let's stick to the dynamics of the actual situation and apply them to the hypotheticals in here. Because she wasn't a coach, she was an athletic trainer who likely got the job solely because of who her father was...
If a 20-year old was an athletic trainer on my daughter's soccer team, I'd absolutely expect that there are rules in place that limit a romantic relationship. If those rules were violated and my child tells me it was consensual, then I have a problem with all of her, him/her, and the adults actually in authority (the actual coaches and school authority). The athletic trainers are the muhfukkas who are in charge of the equipment and diet plans and travel and shyt. They don't have any personnel control...
They absolutely should and probably do have standards prohibiting fraternization, but they don't control your playing time or roster spot or any of that shyt. So stay with me here...
Do I think this chick was doing these sexual acts? I absolutely belive it, this isn't hard to buy at all. Using the premise you and I are working on, that my child is 17 and the trainer is 20, that isn't rape unless it wasn't consensual. A person of any age forcing themselves on my child is rape. A 17 year old and a 20 year old realistically can be students of the same high school at the same time, a relationship be it platonic or romantic can form from there...
She's alleged to have begun these activities in 2001. She turned 20 in August 2001, if these activities occurred after her birthday she was 20, if they occurred before her birthday she was 19...
She's alleged to have committed these acts with SIX boys between the ages of 14 and 17, with no public specification as to the ages of the boys at any given year...
She was still 19 up until August of '01, it is highly probable that she knew the first guy or guys she did these things with, from actually being in school with them. Meaning, in '01, if she was fraternizing with a 15-year old, it's likely she knew this boy from school, that's a 4-year age gap...
If the boy was 14 that hits inappropriate territory once she hit 20. The fact there are six boys listed over a 6-year stretch is pretty ambiguous given the range of ages and lack of specifics...
She was 19/20 in 2001; 20/21 in '02; 21/22 in '03; 22/23 in '04; 23/24 in '05; 24/25 in '06; 25/26 in '07...
Once she turned 21/22 and the boys were younger than 17, then it becomes a real problem as the emotional responsibility is too great. She turned 22 in August of 2003. Any one of these guys who wasn't 17 in her age 22 year were statutory raped. If the guy or guys she was messing with in her age 22 year were 17, they weren't raped...
She turned 23 in August '04. Everybody is off limits then, anything she did fron her 23rd birthday on are what should get her in trouble today. So from August 2004 to whenever this allegedly ended in 2007 is the real window she was out here preying on minors and she should be held accordingly for it...
If she was 22 fukking with 14 and 15 year olds, nail her to the wall for it, that's wrong. If she was 21 and fukking with a 14 or 15 year old, hold her responsible for it...
There's too much vagueness and not enough specific info on the ages of her and the parties when the acts occurred, I'm not a fan of broadbrushing everything and I'm not a fan of treating every situation as equal...
I also question the motivations of the guys bringing about this lawsuit 15 years after the last incident is alleged in the documents. For at least some of these guys, it's been LONGER than 15 years since their escapades with her. Note, I'm not arguing that she didn't do what she's alleged to have done, I believe it most likely happened...
Why the 15 to 21 year wait in bringing about the lawsuit?
Everything about this says that the coach and other leaders at school knew of this at the time, and all of us who were of sound mind in the 00s should be able to recall that this would have just been regarded as the coach's daughter school whore by virtually anyone...
The problem is once she reached an age where she wasn't just "coach's daughter" anymore, someone of authority shoulda got on this, whether the kids did or not. But the kids have been adults for a long time now, I'm not measuring trauma bit it's wild suspicious that they've waited this long to push forward a lawsuit, guys if different classes, who all want the benefit of the doubt that they were taken advantage of...
To circle back to our sidebar, there exists a possibility here that she was in close age to some of these guys, and the possibility that she knew some of these guys from being in class (re:school) at the sane time as them. The vagueness of information creates a possibility where maybe she was mopping up 5 of these 6 guys in 2001-2002, with continued relations with the same 5 guys, and then deviated to one guy in '07...
There's too much information not being publicly released. We know that the lawsuit alleges 2001-2007 but we don't know specific dates and ages of who was messed with in which years...
Ultimately the school district is liable for allowing a paid employee regardless of age to run wild, and THEY should be held accountable for it. Doubly so if she was really out here at 23+ touching up teenage boys. Get her ass with it if it's within statute of limitations, and get the school board for it...
Nggas really post tryin to win daps, Nobel peace prizes, video vanguard awards. Tf goin on man. Ol ‘that’s not okay’ head ass
when it's an attractive broad, but what about these 
old hoes wanting teenage weenie.