LionofJudah
Banned
Ok. I misquoted. Man enough to admit that, but it doesn't change the fact I shytted on all of your misguided points. Small mistake, you agreed with his comment which doesn't really change the point.
And yes, I would be able to tell you what specifically was changed or at least to a degree what was edited and revised. This is common knowledge that's out there for the learning. Just because you choose to be blind doesn't mean someone who thinks practically (see: facts & logic) does.
It's funny that you say I'm looking like a fool and can't state what was changed about the bible, and that I repeat what the next man says...So let me ask you just this ONE question.
Can you specifically tell me where the Bible WASN'T changed, why it is true and correct, or how believing in words and texts from not even 3,000 years ago (when humanity is over millions of years old) ISN'T believing what YOU heard the next man say? That's all I want to know. Please, and thank you.
How can I tell you where the Bible 'wasn't changed' when I'm not stating it was changed at all. nikka should be telling me where it 'wasn't changed.' As far as the rest of your question, anything that you have ever learned was taught to you by someone, or came from another source. So for you to say the Bible is false and changed etc, you would have to apply that same logic to anything you've ever read, specifically historical documents.