Hegseth Orders Pentagon to Stop Offensive Cyberoperations Against Russia

[Rick Fox at UNC]

Do you not know the implications of this?

I truly do not. You?

No. If you had any fukking clue you would be a scholar at some DC think tank. Or working as a lawyer at the Hague, or UN, or State, or Treasury, or CIA/NSA, or some district court in DC.

Not trolling around here with the rest of us idiots.

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

Do you not know the implications of this?

Unless you work U.S. Intel, actively run ops, work State department, etc. You have no clue. And even then, at the highest level, its nebulous. That's what makes the work difficult.

Now everyone is an intelligence expert because they read a piece in the Times.

There are people who have written entire tomes on the U.S. intelligence apparatus (Steve Coll and Evan Thomas) who will tell you they don't know, and that often, insiders don't even truly know what effect a decision will have.

Just admit you don't know and that you're parroting some shyt you heard from other fear mongering community college idiots and move on.

 

[Fill Collins]

Unless you work U.S. Intel, actively run ops, work State department, etc. You have no clue. And even then, at the highest level, its nebulous. That's what makes the work difficult.

Now everyone is an intelligence expert because they read a piece in the Times.

There are people who have written entire tomes on the U.S. intelligence apparatus (Steve Coll and Evan Thomas) who will tell you they don't know, and that often, insiders don't even truly know what effect a decision will have.

Just admit you don't know and that you're parroting some shyt you heard from other fear mongering community college idiots and move on.

Russia isn't an ally of the US

Your brother still dead?

 

[O.T.I.S.]

Unless you work U.S. Intel, actively run ops, work State department, etc. You have no clue. And even then, at the highest level, its nebulous. That's what makes the work difficult.

Now everyone is an intelligence expert because they read a piece in the Times.

There are people who have written entire tomes on the U.S. intelligence apparatus (Steve Coll and Evan Thomas) who will tell you they don't know, and that often, insiders don't even truly know what effect a decision will have.

Just admit you don't know and that you're parroting some shyt you heard from other fear mongering community college idiots and move on.

Negro, some of us here do have a clue

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

Negro, some of us here do have a clue

Agreed.

 

[Traveler]

Unless you work U.S. Intel, actively run ops, work State department, etc. You have no clue. And even then, at the highest level, its nebulous. That's what makes the work difficult.

Now everyone is an intelligence expert because they read a piece in the Times.

There are people who have written entire tomes on the U.S. intelligence apparatus (Steve Coll and Evan Thomas) who will tell you they don't know, and that often, insiders don't even truly know what effect a decision will have.

Just admit you don't know and that you're parroting some shyt you heard from other fear mongering community college idiots and move on.

This is so correct. Unless you have the technical background and access to all of the current intel (changes daily) then you really don''t fully understand. What leaks out is only a small fraction of what the IC knows. So if you think it is bad, its probably much worse. The Russians are the best at Cyber Operations. Stopping stuff right now is incredibly stupid.

 

[Traveler]

Negro, some of us here do have a clue

Agreed. There are a few coli posters who know what they are talking about be it they work in cyber security or the IC.

 

[JT-Money]

DHS says CISA won’t stop looking at Russian cyber threats​

DHS says CISA won’t stop looking at Russian cyber threats

The statement is a rebuttal to stories suggesting otherwise.

cyberscoop.com

 

[Apollo Creed]

So Havana finna turn into Sosua for Americans or nah

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

This is so correct. Unless you have the technical background and access to all of the current intel (changes daily) then you really don''t fully understand. What leaks out is only a small fraction of what the IC knows. So if you think it is bad, its probably much worse. The Russians are the best at Cyber Operations. Stopping stuff right now is incredibly stupid.

:smile, nod, agree:

 

[IIVI]

If this wasn’t good for us back in the 80’s, why would it be good for us after 40 years of built-up Russian animosity?

Our economy’s tanked. I hope people have a whole lot of money saved up. We went from having access to allies’ exports to having access to Russian exports (diamonds, gems, oil and smoke). How useful in 2025.

 

[O.T.I.S.]

This is so correct. Unless you have the technical background and access to all of the current intel (changes daily) then you really don''t fully understand. What leaks out is only a small fraction of what the IC knows. So if you think it is bad, its probably much worse. The Russians are the best at Cyber Operations. Stopping stuff right now is incredibly stupid.

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

Great morning entertainment.

 

[StretfordRed]

Russia straight up won the cold war after the west thumped their chest and declared "victory "

#chessnotcheckers
#lightyearsahead
#timetolearntherussiananthem
#KGB=P.I.M.P.s

Next step, Trump surrenders all of our nukes to Putin

GAME. SET. MATCH - VLADIMIR!!

That isn’t Putin’s goal, if he can give up all nukes and regain the USSR nations again, as it was previously, he would have won.

 

[StretfordRed]

Unless you work U.S. Intel, actively run ops, work State department, etc. You have no clue. And even then, at the highest level, its nebulous. That's what makes the work difficult.

Now everyone is an intelligence expert because they read a piece in the Times.

There are people who have written entire tomes on the U.S. intelligence apparatus (Steve Coll and Evan Thomas) who will tell you they don't know, and that often, insiders don't even truly know what effect a decision will have.

Just admit you don't know and that you're parroting some shyt you heard from other fear mongering community college idiots and move on.

If we are talking a cyber threat intelligence, take it from me, you do not need to solely work in US intel to track Russian state threat actors.

BTW the chain of evidence does not only flow from government -> private companies. Many private companies are at the pointy end of intelligence operations.