JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
Let 'em try, and that would get a real international discussion going.
A group that is armed, organized, and marching/present, state forces would just bust on them with no regard for the consequences?
Heavily Armed Oath Keepers Showed Up to Ferguson Last Night
- Thread starter 88m3
- Start date
Let 'em try, and that would get a real international discussion going.
A group that is armed, organized, and marching/present, state forces would just bust on them with no regard for the consequences?
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Prison Planet.com » Media Launches New Demonization Campaign as Oath Keepers Arrive in Ferguson
Media Launches New Demonization Campaign as Oath Keepers Arrive in Ferguson
Despite Oath Keepers protecting black-owned businesses from looters during previous unrest
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
August 11, 2015
The same establishment media that celebrated black-owned businesses being looted and burned during last year’s Ferguson riots is once again demonizing Oath Keepers – the organization that helped protect property belonging to Ferguson residents from being attacked.
Following Sunday night’s shooting, Infowars reporters Joe Biggs and Jakari Jackson arrived in Ferguson to cover the latest developments. They were flanked by Oath Keepers members who were exercising their right to open carry.
Despite the fact that the Oath Keepers immediately began educating Ferguson demonstrators on their constitutional rights and having constructive conversations about how the movement should be about unity and not race hate, the media jumped on their presence and instantly turned it into another opportunity for race baiting and division.
Newsweek quoted the Southern Poverty Law Center, a George Soros-backed outfit that exists solely to smear conservative groups, accusing Oath Keepers of being “fiercely anti-government” and “militaristic”.
St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar also said the group’s presence was “both unnecessary and inflammatory,” while #BlackLivesMatter activist Talal Ahmad questioned why “white citizens” were even allowed to enter a “black community” at all.
The Independent also contributed to the race-baiting, asking why only white people are allowed to carry guns (anyone is allowed to open carry under Missouri law regardless of their skin color).
The term ‘Oath Keepers’ soon began trending on Twitter, where the echo chamber of negative rhetoric was amplified.
Deray McKesson, a prominent #BlackLivesMatter leader who is constantly lavished with praise by the mainstream media, also retweeted a slur against Oath Keepers and Infowars.
Why is Oath Keepers – an organization that came to the aid of Ferguson residents during last year’s looting – being demonized by #BlackLivesMatter leaders?
And why are #BlackLivesMatter leaders parroting the same propaganda as mainstream media outlets that celebrated black-owned businesses in Ferguson being looted?
Why are attempts by the Oath Keepers to create unity in opposition to police brutality between blacks and whites being turned into another excuse for racial division by #BlackLivesMatter leaders and the establishment media?
The videos below, which show protesters and Oath Keepers engaging in constructive dialogue about how to get past racial division and unite blacks and whites in opposition to police and state brutality, illustrate why those who wish to hijack and corrupt the #BlackLivesMatter movement are so terrified of this narrative being communicated.
Media Launches New Demonization Campaign as Oath Keepers Arrive in Ferguson
Despite Oath Keepers protecting black-owned businesses from looters during previous unrest
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
August 11, 2015
The same establishment media that celebrated black-owned businesses being looted and burned during last year’s Ferguson riots is once again demonizing Oath Keepers – the organization that helped protect property belonging to Ferguson residents from being attacked.
Following Sunday night’s shooting, Infowars reporters Joe Biggs and Jakari Jackson arrived in Ferguson to cover the latest developments. They were flanked by Oath Keepers members who were exercising their right to open carry.
Despite the fact that the Oath Keepers immediately began educating Ferguson demonstrators on their constitutional rights and having constructive conversations about how the movement should be about unity and not race hate, the media jumped on their presence and instantly turned it into another opportunity for race baiting and division.
Newsweek quoted the Southern Poverty Law Center, a George Soros-backed outfit that exists solely to smear conservative groups, accusing Oath Keepers of being “fiercely anti-government” and “militaristic”.
St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar also said the group’s presence was “both unnecessary and inflammatory,” while #BlackLivesMatter activist Talal Ahmad questioned why “white citizens” were even allowed to enter a “black community” at all.
The Independent also contributed to the race-baiting, asking why only white people are allowed to carry guns (anyone is allowed to open carry under Missouri law regardless of their skin color).
The term ‘Oath Keepers’ soon began trending on Twitter, where the echo chamber of negative rhetoric was amplified.
Deray McKesson, a prominent #BlackLivesMatter leader who is constantly lavished with praise by the mainstream media, also retweeted a slur against Oath Keepers and Infowars.
Why is Oath Keepers – an organization that came to the aid of Ferguson residents during last year’s looting – being demonized by #BlackLivesMatter leaders?
And why are #BlackLivesMatter leaders parroting the same propaganda as mainstream media outlets that celebrated black-owned businesses in Ferguson being looted?
Why are attempts by the Oath Keepers to create unity in opposition to police brutality between blacks and whites being turned into another excuse for racial division by #BlackLivesMatter leaders and the establishment media?
The videos below, which show protesters and Oath Keepers engaging in constructive dialogue about how to get past racial division and unite blacks and whites in opposition to police and state brutality, illustrate why those who wish to hijack and corrupt the #BlackLivesMatter movement are so terrified of this narrative being communicated.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Keep believing the Mainstream Media brehs.As I constantly repeat, I don't agree with everything A. Jones or any other alternative/independent media pundit says. However, they spit exponentially more truth than those talking heads or big media outlets.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
As I constantly repeat, I don't agree with everything A. Jones or any other alternative/independent media pundit says. However, they spit exponentially more truth than those talking heads or big media outlets.
heavily armed white people in a black city dealing with racial tension is a great idea.
You're an idiot.
3-5 black men with assault rifles, yeah definitely. Then label them as agressors of thr altercation.Let 'em try, and that would get a real international discussion going.
A group that is armed, organized, and marching/present, state forces would just bust on them with no regard for the consequences?
Isn't that the reason the young man was shot the other day? Police units responding to a group of armed men if I remember correctly.
Domingo Halliburton
Handmade in USA
I hate the editorializion of these articles including the ones in the OP.
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
Im putting it in perspective to the scenario at hand, i only saw 3-5 of these guys at a time in the videos.3-5...
What about 50-100?
Obviously they cant slaughter 50-100 people at a time, of any race, without some sort of incident
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
I never said it was a bad or good idea
I just posted the rebuttal story, to the MSM saying it's white racists running around with AR-15s in Feguson. The videos show what's really going on.
Don't get angry at me, cause the viewpoint you want to be displayed is completely inaccurate
I was just eating my bacon, jalapeno burger, minding by business @Serious
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
Im putting it in perspective to the scenario at hand, i only saw 3-5 of these guys at a time in the videos.
Obviously they cant slaughter 50-100 people at a time, of any race, without some sort of incident
Well there it is, then.
Air strikes
OK. Imagine the headlines...
"American/Missouri government bombs Ferguson, MO"
"Dozens killed in government airstrike on Ferguson, MO"
They think people are mad now?
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
I never said it was a bad or good idea
I just posted the rebuttal story, to the MSM saying it's white racists running around with AR-15s in Feguson. The videos show what's really going on.
Don't get angry at me, cause the viewpoint you want to be displayed is completely inaccurate
I was just eating my bacon, jalapeno burger, minding by business @Serious
Who said they were racists? I pointed out it's white supremacy which it is. Heavily armed white men marching around a black city with rifles and no one including the police is going to stop them. The "video shows what's really going on" how does it show that? They have no place in being there or the conversation at large. They want to walk around with rifles they should do it in there own town but they won't do that now will they? Golly I wonder why.
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
True, but it was a different social climate... no national movement shining a spotlight on the issue of state murder of Afrikans. And there was no internet either.