Has There Ever Been A Better WR Combo Than Roddy White & Julio Jones?

DirtyD

Last Time That I Checc'd......
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
3,387
Reputation
680
Daps
7,906
Reppin
Queens
tumblr_m6yrsfxhRy1qgj8qx.jpg
 

fhsomar

Rookie
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
39
Reputation
0
Daps
19
Reppin
NULL
this thread is pathetic i can name at least 5 wr duos better than white and jones ,,, that being said the potential these guys have as a duo for the next few years is ridiculous keyword POTENTIAL as a DUO
 

Rev

Bong
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
21,741
Reputation
3,181
Daps
69,941
Reppin
Uptown
that duo isn't even better than the likes of Keenan McCardell & Jimmy Smith.
 

Xerces

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
12,225
Reputation
-1,690
Daps
23,236
Reppin
Texas
Threadstarter coulda had a quality thread if he worded it different. I'm not gonna say they're the best but they're up there especially if Julio learned to catch the ball. But he's never been able to catch like that
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SXsdk2-Y_k]Julio Jones Rookie Highlights [HD] - YouTube[/ame]



:why:
 

obarth

R.I.P Char
Poster of the Year
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,844
Reputation
9,166
Daps
83,792
Reppin
Pawgs with dragons
@this thread
http://www.the-coli.com/coliseum/29763-best-wr-duo.html

Over-rating the NFC East again.

That shyt never ends

Don't do this to yourself. Last year before the playoffs, I made a statement about the Giants being better than their record due to playing in the toughest division in the league and being tested by fire. You scoffed at that. We know how that ended.

The NFC East is easily the best and toughest division in the sport. This nikka said NFC South :russ: The Panthers are on the come up and I think Freeman is going to have a bounce back year, but neither of those teams would finish in the top 3 in the NFC East. The Bengals are pretenders who show out one a year every decade. The AFC North will perennially be a battle between the Steelers and Ravens. That said, both of those teams are starting to get a little long in the tooth on defense. The worst team in our division played the best teams in the league tough last year and that was with Rex Grossman throwing the ball. :comeon: 8-8 in the NFC East is not equivalent to 8-8 in the AFC West.
 

FloorGeneral

I don't even know anymore...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,534
Reputation
2,639
Daps
22,483
Reppin
Packerland
Even in then, the argument was that Rodgers had better weapons than Brady, not that he was a product of those weapons. :snoop:

Do you know how stupid you sound typing that out? The argument was being made of who's better: Rodgers or Brady. The fact is that when comparing the two, everyone liked to point to Rodgers' "weapons" as the reason he was so good.

It doesn't matter how you try to paint it: ppl liked to point to Rodgers' "weapons" as a reason for his success, and now ppl are saying that those same "weapons" are only good because of Rodgers. Interesting how things have flipped all of a sudden. Then again, maybe they just wanna use that excuse seeing that we're talking about a white WR that put up crazy numbers. If Jordy were black, not only would we not be having this conversation, but Rodgers would still be a product of his weapons to some of the clowns on this site.

your combo along with white and jones also didn't win a playoff game

15-1, coming off a Super Bowl winning season, and one of the best offensive seasons ever. Unfortunately our offense couldn't play defense last year. :manny:
 

HarlemUSA

Lightbringer and Azor Ahai
Supporter
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
6,295
Reputation
450
Daps
11,584
Do you know how stupid you sound typing that out? The argument was being made of who's better: Rodgers or Brady. The fact is that when comparing the two, everyone liked to point to Rodgers' "weapons" as the reason he was so good.

It doesn't matter how you try to paint it: ppl liked to point to Rodgers' "weapons" as a reason for his success, and now ppl are saying that those same "weapons" are only good because of Rodgers. Interesting how things have flipped all of a sudden. Then again, maybe they just wanna use that excuse seeing that we're talking about a white WR that put up crazy numbers. If Jordy were black, not only would we not be having this conversation, but Rodgers would still be a product of his weapons to some of the clowns on this site.



15-1, coming off a Super Bowl winning season, and one of the best offensive seasons ever. Unfortunately our offense couldn't play defense last year. :manny:

Did you ever think the people saying Rodgers is good because of his weapons aren't the same people who think the weapons are good because of Rodgers? :manny:
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
27,791
Reputation
4,712
Daps
103,463
Do you know how stupid you sound typing that out? The argument was being made of who's better: Rodgers or Brady. The fact is that when comparing the two, everyone liked to point to Rodgers' "weapons" as the reason he was so good.

It doesn't matter how you try to paint it: ppl liked to point to Rodgers' "weapons" as a reason for his success, and now ppl are saying that those same "weapons" are only good because of Rodgers. Interesting how things have flipped all of a sudden. Then again, maybe they just wanna use that excuse seeing that we're talking about a white WR that put up crazy numbers. If Jordy were black, not only would we not be having this conversation, but Rodgers would still be a product of his weapons to some of the clowns on this site.


I don't sound stupid, you're just being emotional as usual.


I'll try to explain this one more time: 99% of the people who choose Brady in that argument had Rodgers at a close number 2, or 1B. The superiority of Rodgers weapons was used to explain his somewhat superior numbers compared to Brady....it was NEVER suggested that Rodgers was a product of his weapons.

If you still can't understand that, then :manny:
 

FloorGeneral

I don't even know anymore...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,534
Reputation
2,639
Daps
22,483
Reppin
Packerland
Did you ever think the people saying Rodgers is good because of his weapons aren't the same people who think the weapons are good because of Rodgers? :manny:

:laugh: it truly makes no difference to me. I just find it funny that both arguments are being made. shyt is really:mindblown: status.

At the end of the day, on Sunday's, I get to watch Rodgers throw, and all them weapons catch. Win-win for me :win:
 
Top