Has msnbc surpassed Fox News with agenda driven news?
- Thread starter Bernie Madoff
- Start date
the next guy
Superstar
It's all entertainment...
AquaCityBoy
Veteran
nikkas sleepin on Al Jazeera America? 
ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
This is the 100000000 time this thread has been made in SOHH/COLI history
For the last time: NO. No matter how much you wish it was true, it has not.
www.youtube.com
It is an easily disproven silly notion
For the last time: NO. No matter how much you wish it was true, it has not.
www.youtube.com
It is an easily disproven silly notion
Huh?
ExodusNirvana
Change is inevitable...
Die in a fire, choking on acid, while tripping on acid
kermit da hustla
Banned
Reality has a strong liberal bias.
Fox wins any debate against MSNBC because Fox doesn't take days off from reporting news to show old episodes of Lockup and Unsolved Mysteries.
Turn to MSNBC right now and you won't see any live discussion of the events going on in the world but instead you will see a bunch of convicts being interviewed by documentarians.
Turn to MSNBC right now and you won't see any live discussion of the events going on in the world but instead you will see a bunch of convicts being interviewed by documentarians.
Then why do liberals lie so much?
I'm copping this book thanks breh
Government and news media
Editorial distortion is aggravated by the news media’s dependence upon private and governmental news sources. If a given newspaper, television station, magazine, etc., incurs governmental disfavor, it is subtly excluded from access to information. Consequently, it loses readers or viewers, and ultimately, advertisers. To minimize such financial danger, news media businesses editorially distort their reporting to favor government and corporate policies in order to stay in business.
Herman and Chomsky's "propaganda model" describes five editorially distorting filters applied to news reporting in mass media:
- Size, Ownership, and Profit Orientation: The dominant mass-media outlets are large firms which are run for profit. Therefore they must cater to the financial interest of their owners - often corporations or particular controlling investors. The size of the firms is a necessary consequence of the capital requirements for the technology to reach a mass audience.
- The Advertising License to Do Business: Since the majority of the revenue of major media outlets derives from advertising (not from sales or subscriptions), advertisers have acquired a "de-facto licensing authority".[4] Media outlets are not commercially viable without the support of advertisers. News media must therefore cater to the political prejudices and economic desires of their advertisers. This has weakened the working-class press, for example, and also helps explain the attrition in the number of newspapers.
- Sourcing Mass Media News: Herman and Chomsky argue that “the large bureaucracies of the powerful subsidize the mass media, and gain special access [to the news], by their contribution to reducing the media’s costs of acquiring [...] and producing, news. The large entities that provide this subsidy become 'routine' news sources and have privileged access to the gates. Non-routine sources must struggle for access, and may be ignored by the arbitrary decision of the gatekeepers.”[5]
- Flak and the Enforcers: "Flak" refers to negative responses to a media statement or program (e.g. letters, complaints, lawsuits, or legislative actions). Flak can be expensive to the media, either due to loss of advertising revenue, or due to the costs of legal defense or defense of the media outlet's public image. Flak can be organized by powerful, private influence groups (e.g. think tanks). The prospect of eliciting flak can be a deterrent to the reporting of certain kinds of facts or opinions.[5]
- Anti-Communism: This was included as a filter in the original 1988 edition of the book, but Chomsky argues that since the end of the Cold War (1945–91), anticommunism was replaced by the "War on Terror", as the major social control mechanism.[6]
