Grown men that seriously talk about zodiac signs
- Thread starter xXOGLEGENDXx
- Start date
Abstract83
Superstar
I dont see the big deal. I entertain it but I dont live my life by it.
I use it to get out of trouble and will continue to do so. If at any point I've ever banned or bushed, I'm copping pleas and attributing any trouble I caused to me being a leo.
You can say the same about religion
Womb Raider
sigh….*unzips pants*
OP prolly a sag or Leo, evil mfs
Your grown man talking anout another man who talks about zodiac signs to strangers . You and your cousin in the same boat
You're instantly sweet. My cousin is a grown ass man with a child and he's always talking about how pisces are.
Chichiman fi dead
CapI dont even know what the fukk mine is
colicolicoli
Droid Gang
Definitely don’t think guys into astrology are sweet.
If anything they are usually players and toxic
If anything they are usually players and toxic
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
There is a difference between zodiac signs, horoscopes etc, and astrology. If you do your natal chart with birth time, you can literally point to events in your life.
Your sun sign is a very small part of your life. The daily horoscopes people read are bullshyt, because even if you are born under the same sign, you can have various charts, and you can’t predict that in a general sense.
Each planet was in a particular sign at a particular degree when you were born. The planets are always shifting, and creating transits that can bring energy for certain life events.
For instance. Saturn is the planet of endings, responsibility, and difficult times. It spends about 2 years in a house. The natal chart has 12 houses like a clock. The 10th house is career. In 2008, Saturn was transiting my 10th house. That year, I lost my job, had my car repo’d, and started my new career.
Your sun sign is a very small part of your life. The daily horoscopes people read are bullshyt, because even if you are born under the same sign, you can have various charts, and you can’t predict that in a general sense.
Each planet was in a particular sign at a particular degree when you were born. The planets are always shifting, and creating transits that can bring energy for certain life events.
For instance. Saturn is the planet of endings, responsibility, and difficult times. It spends about 2 years in a house. The natal chart has 12 houses like a clock. The 10th house is career. In 2008, Saturn was transiting my 10th house. That year, I lost my job, had my car repo’d, and started my new career.
Yeah I always thought that shyt was for bytches and fakkits. I know nikkas get into it to relate to bytches but I’ve always known it to be bullshyt because the descriptions are so general that anyone can frame it to describes themselves. Definition of confirmation bias and people who are heavily into horoscopes hve been linked to being more narcissistic and less intelligent :
Narcissism Strongest Predictor of Belief in Astrology
Study finds narcissism is strongest predictor among astrology believers, with lower IQ levels common among believers.www.psychnewsdaily.com
Which accurately describes most of the people I know who are heavily into “signs”
That's not surprising at all.
Another obvious reason they're bullshyt (out of many) is that the earth's orbit and the relative position of all the stars has changed significantly since astrology signs were invented thousands of years ago. So people who think they were born under a certain constellation weren't even born under that one - literally ALL the dates are wrong now because of the natural shifts that have occurred since ancient times.
Astrology: Why Your Zodiac Sign and Horoscope Are Wrong
Your horoscope can't possibly be right, becaue the zodiac constellations have shifted over time..
Last edited:
The moon affects the tides because it's a enormous amount of water spread out over a huge area, so the moon's gravity has a different impact on every part of it and that leads to tides. In smaller water bodies the effect is irrelevant - in the Great Lakes, for example, the entire tidal impact is just 2 inches, so even wind has a larger impact than the moon has. For a normal sized pond/lake the impact of the moon isn't even a millimeter.
And that's the moon, which has a FAR larger gravitational impact on things here than any other body. Planets have virtually no impact at all, and the impact of stars (other than the sun) is completely, completely meaningless.
Here's one way to put it to you:
* The Earth's gravity alone varies by up to 0.7% depending on where you are standing. For example, gravity in Oslo is 0.5% stronger than gravity in Mexico City.
* The impact of the moon's gravity on you is 0.0003% as powerful as the gravity of Earth. In other words, the range of fluxuation of the Earth's gravity depending on where you are standing is over 1000 times stronger than the impact of the moon's gravity.
* The impact of Mars's gravity on you is 0.00000007% as powerful as the gravity of Earth. In other words, the location-dependent fluxuations in Earth's gravity are TEN MILLION TIMES larger than the entire impact of Mars's gravity.
If people who believe in astrology really believe the gravitational impact of the moon and planets has any relevance on you at all, then why don't they care about the gravitational impact of the different locations on Earth? Driving from Los Angeles to Denver would have a gravitation impact on your body thousands of times greater than any planetary movement could ever create.
And even more hilarious, they don't even care about how close or far the planets are, but about what it's position is in the sky. But the position of a planet in the sky is a poor approximation for distance. And then they care about random shyt like planets being "lined up" or crossing each other and shyt, which is even more meaningless because those planets in reality are hundreds of millions of miles apart in completely differnet orbits and the idea that they're "lined up" is a pure optical illusion due to our distance from them, in reality there's no line at all.
And that's before you even get into stars and constellations, which are not only so fukking far away as to be irrelevant but don't even actually show up in the right places in the sky compared to astrological signs anymore.
I’ve met my fair share of crystal babies. Had one girl try to guess my star sign and she incorrectly listed 6 before I put her out of her misery. Then when I told her, she was like “Ohhh, that makes so much sense”
You could switch around everyone's signs and they would still think they make sense. It's a huge exercise in Forer Effect (making claims that could apply to anyone), covering your bases (always having explanations that cover one thing happening but also its complete opposite), and selective confirmation bias (just cherry-picking whichever parts apply and ignoring the ones that don't).
No on has ever been able to confirm a single one of the bullshyt astrology claims in a controlled setting - they can't guess other people's signs or predict what will happen based on their signs. Whenever it's put to a real test it always fails.
lol - that's a total lie by astologists. If they had any validity, why would they need to lie?
Charles Manson is a "Scorpio"
Gary Ridgway (the "Green River Killer" convicted of 49 murders in Washington) was an "Aquarius"
Robert Hansen (the "Butcher Baker" who killed 20 women in Alaska) is an "Aquarius"
William Bonin (the "Freeway Killer" who killed 21 boys) was a "Capricorn"
Tommy Lynn Sells (the "Coast to Coast" killer believed to have 28 victims) was a Cancer"
Paul John Knowles (the "Casanova Killer" with 18 confirmed murders but claims 35) was a "Taurus"
Patrick Wayne Kearney (the "Trash Bag Killer" who killed up to 42 young boys) was a "Libra"
Albert Fish (the "Werewolf of Wysteria" who molested, killed, and ate at least 5-9 children) was a "Taurus"
John George Haigh (the "Acid Bath Murderer" who killed 9 people and dissolved them in acid) was a "Leo"
Harold Shipman ("Dr. Death" with at least 218 confirmed murders) is a "Capricorn"
Carl Panzram (American serial killer confessed to 21 killings but is suspected in over 100) was a "Cancer"
Andrei Chikatilo (the Rostov Ripper who killed at least 52 people in the USSR in the 1980s) was a "Libra"
Ahmad Suradji (the Indonesian serial killer who killed 42 young women) was a "Capricorn"
Javed Iqbal (Pakistan serial killer responible for murdering 100 street kids in the 1990s) was a "Libra"
Yang Xinhai (China's "Monster Killer" who confessed to 67 murders and 23 rapes) was a "Leo"
Daniel Camargo Barbosa ("The Sadist of El Charquito" who raped and murdered 180 young girls) was an "Aquarius"
Pedro López (Columbian serial killer and rapist with 110 confirmed victims) was a "Libra"
Luis Garavito (another Columbian serial killer known as "The Beast" who confessed to 147 killings) was an "Aquarius"
The claim that all famous serial killers are Pisces, Gemini, Sagittarius, or Virgo was a straight lie. They just looked up the signs of a few of the main famous ones (Bundy, Gacy, Dahmer, etc.) and then found a few others that matched their signs, while ignoring the numerous famous examples who didn't fit in.