I think it has to do with how pronounced secondary sexual traits are for women vs men.
Women, when judging how attractive another woman would be to a man can more readily size up her competion. You see, women know that once another chick has supple breast, hour glass figure, nice shaped apple bottom. Men will immediatley find that attractive. Those biological features catch the eye better because they are just more noticable at first glance. The only thing women cant seem to sometimes gauge are little things like a womans walk, or her overall feminine sexual aura that some women give off (not thots, I'm talking the subtle shyt). But for the most part, women can quickly gauge if another woman is attractive to men, simply because their physical sexual traits are easy to see.
As for us men, its not easy at all. Because outside of the extremes (meaining the obvioulsy tall, overly athletic pyhsiques) there are not real noticable secondary physical traits amongst us. In our eyes, most everyday brehs are pretty much, built the same, around the same height, etc. We also don't have much of an idea when it comes to facial features either because the feedback we receive from women most of our lives are sooooo sporatic. To us, womens taste lack consistecy. Wheras for us men, we are very consistant on what we like because those physical traits amongst women are so pronounced. I beleive women gauge those subtle differences in us men, that are not obvious to us because we dont really have extremes in our physical apprearence.
So we may see a dude that we deem is no threat, ugly or avg, but women have a different perspective. The dude who we think is just avg has some sort of feature or whatever that women pick up on. This is because visually, women are much more varied in there body types vs men
I hope this makes ANY sort of sense. I'm sleepy from benydryls and a beer.
but the ones i met were mostly filipino in San Diego
