I mean, what does it matter if you can step to Gilbert on topics, if your takes are often juvenile and contrarian for the sake of being contrarian?
The MVP vs Finals MVP debate is an example. If you want to challenge Gil's take that a reg MVP is more valuable to a career... cool, but can we not be smart dumb negroes acting like you can't still be an MVP winner, not have a Finals MVP, and win a championship? i.e. David Robinson and Kevin Garnett. Steph Curry literally won MVP the same season his teammate Iggy won Finals MVP.
The show desperately needs a Kenny Smith type who can match wits with Gil and challenge his thought process instead of his patience. An MVP vs Finals MVP debate should've had them discussing KG vs Pierce, Malone vs Kawhi, Steph vs Iggy, etc and which player would say yes/no to a swap. Instead, it just digressed to the usual yeling over each other.