Ghostbusters 3 Said To Be Scary, coming 2020

Doobie Doo

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
57,696
Reputation
21,535
Daps
373,767
Reppin
Raleigh, NC
:blessed::blessed::blessed::blessed::blessed::blessed:







Ghostbusters 3 Said To Be Scary, May Re-Use Old Footage
By David James 3 hours ago

Ghostbusters 3 is shaping up to be quite the revival. After the deeply disappointing Ghostbusters (2016) (which was crappy for reasons entirely unrelated to the genders of the leads), there’s a sense that this is the franchise’s chance to prove it’s got what it takes. Up until now, all we’ve seen is an enigmatic teaser trailer and a plot description about a family moving back to a small town, but director Jason Reitman appeared at last weekend’s Ghostbusters Fan Fest where he dropped some very intriguing hints about what’s to come.

One of the most reassuring was when he explained that “I want to scare children.” While the 1984 original is generally considered a comedy, I remember watching it when I was a kid and the librarian ghost scene scared the bejeezus out of me (as did the Terror Dogs). One of the many reasons the 2016 reboot didn’t work was that it leaned way too far into bad comedy, with the ghosts never being taken particularly seriously.

But there’s another very interesting development revealed in this panel, with Reitman also saying the following:

“In making this movie, we found something kind of extraordinary. We went to Sony, and we said, ‘We’d really love to get back into the original dailies from 1984. Do you still have them?’ And we found them. They were in a mine in Kansas, and we shipped the boxes to Burbank. We’ve been going through the footage for reasons I cannot tell you, but along the way we found some really cool stuff.”

Ghostbusters Promo Posters
1 of 3

  • ghostbusters-2020-promo-poster-504x600.jpg
    ghostbusters-2020-promo-poster-504x600.jpg
PrevNext
CLICK TO ZOOM
zoom.png

Now, leaving aside the awesomeness of there being a Kansas mine full of Ghostbusters dailies, what possible reason could Reitman want these for? My bet is that the film may feature members of the classic team with a bit of CGI de-aging applied to them.

Nick Fury in Captain Marvel proved that this technique can be used throughout a movie, and if they were going this route, the multiple hours of dailies will give the artists the reference material they need in order to bring Stantz, Venkman and Zeddemore back…and maybe Spengler if they can be absolutely sure they can do it tastefully.

We should find out very soon, as more of Ghostbusters 3 will no doubt be revealed over the coming months. Either way though, I hope we get to see some of this unseen footage ourselves. There’s a tiny bit here in this video (at 1:20) and it’s awesome, but I really want it all.

Source: Bloody Disgusting
Ghostbusters 3 Said To Be Scary, May Re-Use Old Footage
 

Doobie Doo

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
57,696
Reputation
21,535
Daps
373,767
Reppin
Raleigh, NC
Ghostbusters isn't a horror franchise. SMH

Um, yes it is. It was one of the first movies to combine horror/comedy together. 3 years before that it was the American Werewolf in London setting the tone for future movies like Evil Dead, Return of the living Dead and other horror comedies.
 

David_TheMan

Banned
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
36,805
Reputation
-3,570
Daps
82,791
Um, yes it is. It was one of the first movies to combine horror/comedy together. 3 years before that it was the American Werewolf in London setting the tone for future movies like Evil Dead, Return of the living Dead and other horror comedies.
It was never a horror movie. Lol
Stop it.

As for evil deaf you are getting tge sequel confused with the original. The original wqs pure slasher horror, the 2nd movie turned it into the camp tongue in cheek comedy.

Anerican werewolf in london is a legit horror with comedy elements, but ghostbusters was never that. It was a comedy in tone and characterization.

To try to shift it to a horror franchise is ridiculous and shows how foolish brass is in greenlighting this
 

Nymbus

Great Value Man™
Supporter
Joined
Nov 14, 2014
Messages
9,674
Reputation
3,231
Daps
39,843
It was never a horror movie. Lol
Stop it.

As for evil deaf you are getting tge sequel confused with the original. The original wqs pure slasher horror, the 2nd movie turned it into the camp tongue in cheek comedy.

Anerican werewolf in london is a legit horror with comedy elements, but ghostbusters was never that. It was a comedy in tone and characterization.

To try to shift it to a horror franchise is ridiculous and shows how foolish brass is in greenlighting this
it was kinda scary to young children :ld: idk what they are going for nowadays with how desensitized everyone is haha
 

Mr. Jack Napier

#MambaForever
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
41,796
Reputation
6,589
Daps
152,906
Reppin
The Empire State
Eh. I'm good on the Ghostbusters 1 & 2. Didn't even bother watching the female version.

And the actor who played Egon passed away a couple years back
 

315

#AAGang; formerly Selah
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
28,113
Reputation
10,592
Daps
128,503
Reppin
Syracuse
Can't even remember if I liked the original movies
 
Top