Bleed The Freak
Superstar
Sigh
67 votes could end it all
Just 67
67 votes could end it all
Just 67
it's 330 in the morning in spain. go to sleepHey dikkhead, I'm not calling you a fascist-sympathizer because I think it will change your opinion, I'm calling you a fascist-sympathizer because it's an accurate description of the political ideology you're espousing. If you didn't have a calcified amygdala then you'd be capable of being ashamed at how idiotic and immoral the path you're pursuing is, but you spent your formative years sniffing markers so you'll most likely just plow ahead with zero self-awareness. And I know from past arguments with you that you're barely literate, so I'll say this very clearly: your opinion is wrong because it's progressing a precedence of unconstitutionality and extrajudicial punishment of political ideology by conservative forces in this country, and you're calling on the opposition party to roll over and give up the fight because you personally have the petty electoral vendettas of a small-minded dipshyt and the bytch-heartedness of a conservative bigot who is looking to re-assess the notion of a politics based in moral humanism.
Is that a clear enough argument for you, or do I need to dumb it down even further?
Might as well be a million. We stuck with the idiot.Sigh
67 votes could end it all
Just 67
Was this guy implying that both sides were the same and encouraging people not to vote for genocide Joe and killer Kamala?Is this one of those situations where we can protest the actions of people we didn’t vote for? Is that allowed now?
And right on schedule here comes Tweedledum, the other Republican plant ready to bend over and spread his cheeks for right-wing authoritarianism as long as Trump lets him drink transgender tears. Lack of oxygen from having DeSantis dikk lodged down your throat is making you even stupider than usual.it's 330 in the morning in spain. go to sleep![]()
That explains why we got all these foreign Trump apologist accounts on the coli. Well played china. Well played.
Essentially, I want better victims to be the face of our push back. Like id rather it be someone who pissed Trump off and not also had the tag of being an alleged (on IMO weak to nonexistent evidence) Hamas supporter. It’s obvious this guy is harmless, but he was the face of a destructive politically inconvenient movement and I want there to be a political response…namely, formal indifference. We will have plenty to fight over in the coming months. This guy will have to be a milestone in the memories of what our responsibilities were in November and I want it to be a vicious lesson.But what you're saying actually lacks substance. What I am saying is that normalizing retaliatory deportations for political dissent is DANGEROUS. This isn't a "trick," it's a basic recognition of how authoritarianism takes hold through small escalations that people excuse until it's too late.
You admit it's wrong, but your solution is… what? Punishing him because you're mad at certain voters? You're letting your thirst for spite-based revenge blind you to what's actually happening.
If you're fine with abuses of power as long as they happen to people you don't like, then what use are you? What use is a Democratic party that shares that view?