Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Just thought I shared cause when I started seeing brehs on here talking that “alpha male/beta male” bullshyt years ago I knew this site was headed to incel/cacland.
Basically the whole “alpha male” thing came from a 1970 paper about how wolf packs are led by “alpha males” who establish dominance through physical aggression.
It has been suggested that this be taken to apply to humans, being that wolves are not that far from humans on the evolutionary tree and exhibit similar social behaviors.
And this concept has been co-opted by white internet losers to create pseudointellectual explanations for their insecurities and failures. It makes it easier and digestible to understand any they don’t get any p*ssy or just are not where they want to be life, or conversely that they’re something special just because they do think they possess “alpha male” traits or aspire to. There is an immutable, predetermined hierarchy of masculinity and that explains everything that is uncomfortable.
Only problem it wasn’t true and the writer of the original paper has detracted it. The wolf pack leaders weren’t wolves who earned leadership by winning fights. They were just the parents.
There's no such thing as an alpha male
All this “beta male” “alpha male” stuff is low esteem insecure little dikk cac shyt. You see this concept in action with Trump supporters. These MAGAs tuck their nuts and subordinate themselves to Trump cause they see him as an alpha, and they happily follow him in their beta role. And they guy they consider an alpha is in fact a trust find baby draft dodger who has probably never been in a fight in his life. But they subordinate themselves to him largely because he projects a false aura of strength or masculinity they see lacking in themselves, or under attack from outside forces. Some coli posters are the same with Tariq Nasheed. Get off that cac/red pill/MGTOW shyt. Stand on your own two, respect yourself. That is all.
Basically the whole “alpha male” thing came from a 1970 paper about how wolf packs are led by “alpha males” who establish dominance through physical aggression.
It has been suggested that this be taken to apply to humans, being that wolves are not that far from humans on the evolutionary tree and exhibit similar social behaviors.
And this concept has been co-opted by white internet losers to create pseudointellectual explanations for their insecurities and failures. It makes it easier and digestible to understand any they don’t get any p*ssy or just are not where they want to be life, or conversely that they’re something special just because they do think they possess “alpha male” traits or aspire to. There is an immutable, predetermined hierarchy of masculinity and that explains everything that is uncomfortable.
Only problem it wasn’t true and the writer of the original paper has detracted it. The wolf pack leaders weren’t wolves who earned leadership by winning fights. They were just the parents.
There's no such thing as an alpha male
All this “beta male” “alpha male” stuff is low esteem insecure little dikk cac shyt. You see this concept in action with Trump supporters. These MAGAs tuck their nuts and subordinate themselves to Trump cause they see him as an alpha, and they happily follow him in their beta role. And they guy they consider an alpha is in fact a trust find baby draft dodger who has probably never been in a fight in his life. But they subordinate themselves to him largely because he projects a false aura of strength or masculinity they see lacking in themselves, or under attack from outside forces. Some coli posters are the same with Tariq Nasheed. Get off that cac/red pill/MGTOW shyt. Stand on your own two, respect yourself. That is all.
