tinnyskillz
Superstar
Nikkas finna Rick Rude it from here on out 
FTC bans Non-Compete Clauses.
- Thread starter FRIED MASON
- Start date
Art Barr
INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Cattle Mutilation
Superstar
Meet me in Temecula
Art Barr
INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Meet me in Temecula
I asked where you from.
So we could see if you ever had any great food where you from nationally.
nikka defending jersey Mike's.
I am not sure if you are black.
Or if you are from an urban intellectual space.
You had a hard time answering.
Plus still ain't answered the question.
You replied.
Like some white boi.
mixed with Paulie shore and weird AL.
Living in some country ass town.
In a sun down town like encino Ca.
so again.
We will try this again.
what city?
What side?
What state,...chu from?
Art Barr
Art Barr
Norrin Radd
To me, my board!
AKM-95
All Star
Still one of the crazy wrestling moments as a kid I thought I was trippin LolNikkas finna Rick Rude it from here on out
ThisThis obviously a good thing a lot of companies have been getting crazy with the clauses in recent years.
avon barksdale
i want my corners
bobby lashley appearing on dynamite as robert flashley
KFBF
Superstar
Holy shyt. Thought it was going to get killed.
Except that's his real name and he took it with him to TNA and MMA when he left the first time
firemanBk
The Manslayer
I don't think non-compete's are that relevant anymore
Generally if you're at least somewhat good they will just keep you until your contract runs out and you would be free to go anyway
Who's been the last notable release? Jinder?
Generally if you're at least somewhat good they will just keep you until your contract runs out and you would be free to go anyway
Who's been the last notable release? Jinder?
them non-competes are more stifling to the people who get released and have to sit they asses at home and can't capitalize off of being fresh off TV and jump right into the scene outside of the company they'd been in and get established. It halts them striking while the iron is hot, so to speak.
Being forced to sit on the couch for 3 months can kill some people's desire to jump back in tbh.
Shelton not having needed to put a 'available for bookings after X date' and going straight to 'call me and I'm there' coulda been a big help, for instance. Not just for him, but for keeping him active before the Max Casters of the world could put their feet in their mouths and say some unhelpful shyt
Always found it bullshyt that you can be an independent contractor, get cut, but then they have the audacity to tell you what you can and can't do with your own damn time and life for X amount of days. It's one thing to have them wait out the rest of the contract at home, but you can't 'future endeavor' someone publically then make them sit quietly at home and off socials and out the light until you tell them it's ok to go
KFBF
Superstar
This is probably a pretty big deal for behind the scenes/production staff.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25545715/STK481_STK432_CONGRESS_GOVERNMENT_CIVRGINIA_C.jpg)
The FTC’s noncompete agreements ban is blocked
The judge said the rule was “unreasonably overbroad.”
www.theverge.com
The FTC’s noncompete agreements ban is blocked
A Texas judge has put the rule on hold, saying it would ‘cause irreparable harm.’
By Jess Weatherbed, a news writer focused on creative industries, computing, and internet culture. Jess started her career at TechRadar, covering news and hardware reviews.
Aug 21, 2024, 5:47 AM EDT
:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25545715/STK481_STK432_CONGRESS_GOVERNMENT_CIVRGINIA_C.jpg "Photo collage of a photo of the US Capitol building with an image of the Constitution behind it.")
Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge; Getty Images
A federal judge has blocked the Federal Trade Commission’s ban on noncompete agreements that make it difficult for workers to join their employers’ rivals or launch competing businesses. The ruling prevents the FTC’s ban on noncompete agreements from taking effect on September 4th, though the agency could still appeal the decision.
On Tuesday, US District Judge Ada Brown in Dallas, Texas ruled that the antitrust agency exceeded its statutory authority to ban practices related to unfair methods of competition, saying the noncompete agreements ban is “unreasonably overbroad without a reasonable explanation,” and would “cause irreparable harm.” Brown’s decision now stops the FTC from blocking noncompetes nationwide after initially delaying the ban with a preliminary injunction in July.
According to the FTC, around 30 million people — one in five Americans — have signed noncompete agreements. A federal judge in Pennsylvania had previously declined to block the ban in a separate case last month.
“We are seriously considering a potential appeal”
“We are disappointed by Judge Brown’s decision and will keep fighting to stop noncompetes that restrict the economic liberty of hardworking Americans, hamper economic growth, limit innovation, and depress wages,” FTC spokesperson Victoria Graham said in a statement to The Verge. ”We are seriously considering a potential appeal.”
If the FTC does push ahead with an appeal, it would go to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to be heard. Appeals on district court decisions are often a lengthy process, with the FTC’s appeal against Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard acquisition still pending a result. In the meantime, the FTC will have to challenge noncompetes via case-by-case enforcement actions.
The ruling upholds a lawsuit that Tax firm Ryan LLC filed in April — later backed by the US Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable — to challenge the noncompete agreements ban, arguing that it would make it difficult for companies to retain talent. When the FTC voted 3-2 in support of the ban, the agency said it would allow for more than 8,500 new businesses to be made each year.
