Well it's upon you to see an eye doctor. That I can't help you.
Of course it's digitally created...you expected a picture from 2000 years ago?My vision is great. I see two white men in those pictures.
BTW, those pics are not real...one is of a statue and the other is digitally created.
Of course it's digitally created...you expected a picture from 2000 years ago?
They can only go by what's written and the history of people in Nazareth 2K years ago and beyond.
The book of revelation describes Jesus as having the hair of wool.
Definitely not Caucasian.
the white light is in reference to the light John saw in the vision.it actually describes his hair as being white like wool, not having texture of wool. I have already stated this.
I will trust the scientist and the archeologists who came up with the image before I trust a coli poster.My question would be, how DO YOU accurately claim what race a digitally created image of a person is?
Ok you saw a white man, The BBC documentary and Archeologists envisioned a different race and it was not white.@Chris.B
that digitally created picture of Jesus that you posted.....who created it? and did they say that was a depiction of a black man?
black and white is relative, when I looked at that picture IMO I saw a white man
I will trust the scientist and the archeologists who came up with the image before I trust a coli poster.
Thank you very much.
Type in google....BBC documentary of race of Jesusdid those scientists and archaeologists who came up with the image say that was a black man? or is that your opinion based on looking at the image?
post the original news magazine cover of the image so I can see the headline that accompanies the picture
Ok you saw a white man, The BBC documentary and Archeologists envisioned a different race and it was not white.
Again, I will trust their judgement. Because they hold Phd's and are more learned to be making up stuff.