InstantKlassik
...
One thing that I don't remember seeing anybody comment on in this thread is Punk's Michael Hayes impression, shyt was hilarious and spot on
I mean looking at hhh he's acted way more racist than punk , that booker feudThe CM Punk is racist shyt is just as dumb as the "Macho Man fukked Stephanie when she was underage" shyt...
Reason being, there's no true basis for any of it. It's shyt that geeks on the internet WANT to be true, and even if there are statements to the contrary, they'll assume it's just a cover-up because they want it to be true THAT bad. The Macho/Steph shyt is one of the weirdest things I've ever seen, because it's absolutely baseless, and it's something that's pretty much been imagined because people cant think of any other reason Vince and Savage would have such a long time of not associating with each other. And because they don't know the reason why (because nowadays we have to know everything behind the scenes nshyt), the worst thing they can fathom is that Savage fukked his daughter. And there is literally nothing anyone can say that would convince them it isn't true. Retarded.
It's not like he COULDN'T be racist, anybody in theory COULD be... but there's nothing that actually says he is. You gotta give me a lil' bit more than "oh, he talked shyt about Chris Brown".
His HHH impression was impeccable tooOne thing that I don't remember seeing anybody comment on in this thread is Punk's Michael Hayes impression, shyt was hilarious and spot on
Why would anyone WANT Punk or anyone else to be racist? What kind of logic is that. I don't know if he's racist or not, I'm on my shyt and nikkas should know that
The Macho/Steph thing hasn't died down because Meltzer was asked about it and said there's definitely some strange things that went on with Vince and Macho and also Lanny has kind of winked at the idea that it could be true as well.
I'm not sayin' they want him to be racist like it would make them happy... they want it to be true. They've convinced themselves it's true to the point that no matter what, they still gonna hold on to that idea. As if criticizing Chris Brown is some off-limits shyt that signifies a racist person...
For example, if you suspect someone stole somethin' from you... and it wasn't them... but you've fixed your mind on the idea that THEY did it, at that point you just want it to be true. It could be a whole 'nother person, but it would literally take that person returning it to you and admitting it was them for you not to believe it was the one you suspect.
That's basically the Punk/racist and the Macho/Steph shyt in a nutshell.
And what are you trying to imply ? Besides they made more than one comment by punk and you think Steve Austin wants to moderate a discussion about domestic abuse? He has his own history with abuseWell..he called out Brown. Someone responded for him to speak on Austin. He never brought up Brown again.
truthfully this all TNA's fault for sucking.
Back in the Day it woulda been CM Punk on Nitro the very next week. Pipe Bomb on Vince.
Dolph woulda been in WCW, Cesaro WCW, Chris Hero WCW, Young Bucks WCW, The Briscoes... damn near the whole NXT in WCW...
Thats kinda my thing. Why don't the Indy's come together and do a fed. I know it's alot of moving parts... but if they replicated the old NWA style of one champ different territories. Could be done. It needs to be WWE vs. Everybody... Thats the only thing we can hope for.
TNA could really facilitate that shyt... its soooo much talent out here and the indy style of wrestling is perfect for the small venues they run. They steal from ECW, but take everything except the innovation... actually I believe thats what Paul Heyman wanted to do there right?
Im rambling, but i totally agree my g. They treat people like absolute shyt, cuz they can.
Lol. Nah..I'm saying. He spoke on a Black abuser but his hero, the white one? He wouldn't. That pretty much speaks volumes.