Former WWE Employee CM Punk to speak on leaving WWE tomorrow (Edit: It's Up)

Buggsy Mogues

My spot is solidified if you ask me
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,273
Reputation
3,679
Daps
80,100
Reppin
City of Angels :blessed:
Really ? the same Brock who lost to fellow part timer hhh :snoop: guys just quick to hate without thinking . Hhh got 3 Brock matches but no rematch for punk :patrice: punk Lost to hhh no rematch :benoit: taker , rock as well . Wwe is short sighted

Brock shouldn't have lost to HHH either, but at that point after the bullshyt feud he had gone through with HHH he needed to beat Punk.
 

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,495
Reputation
-7,869
Daps
19,903
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
Phil makes some good points but at the end of the day you can tell what a mark he is for himself. Cuh thinking he should have went over Based Brock :mjlol:or thinking he should have been in the Rock-Cena match :mjlol:

I was dead when when he described that conversation with HHH about the drug test though

H: "Batista took the same piss test we're asking you to take.

Phil: "Did you?" :sas2:

:dead:

I don't think he should have went over Brock unless they had a wrestle mania rematch

He should have never dropped title to rock, rock vs Cena didn't need belt

Losing to triple h when he was as hot as anybody had been since stone cold and going thru the whole Kevin Nash thing was inexcusable
 

23Barrettcity

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
35,454
Reputation
1,509
Daps
52,399
Reppin
NULL
Brock shouldn't have lost to HHH either, but at that point after the bullshyt feud he had gone through with HHH he needed to beat Punk.
Ok and that's why punk was frustrated . The people running the company are short sighted and don't seem like they want to improve their own product , just shortcuts to make money
 

Buggsy Mogues

My spot is solidified if you ask me
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,273
Reputation
3,679
Daps
80,100
Reppin
City of Angels :blessed:
Ok and that's why punk was frustrated . The people running the company are short sighted and don't seem like they want to improve their own product , just shortcuts to make money

It's stupid to say just because HHH beat Brock, that Punk should have. Brock should have never lost period.

I don't wanna hear bout this nikka getting booked poorly he was beating The Shield in 3 on 1 matches before he left :beli:
 

thaKEAF

#grizzlies #titans
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,498
Reputation
9,297
Daps
112,646
Reppin
Memphis
He was on point where he said theres never no long term planning. That explains why the shows have been total trainwrecks for the past several years

Y'all are missing the point about Punk talking about the part timers. These guys like Brock, Rock and Taker aren't there the next day. When Punk is there the next day every time after losing and gets put into a program with someone else, it diminishes the next program. It's just like when Hogan beat HBK at SummerSlam 2005. HBK took the immature route and made the match ridiculous and buried Hogan the next night on RAW. Punk did his jobs and kept it moving on TV. When you lose three times that way in one calendar year, it's definitely frustrating.

I agree with him on both. Now I'm not saying guys like Rock and Brock don't bring in buys for the PPV but continuing to depend on them at the big shows is why you're gonna continue to have to do that. Because you're not building up your current roster and the guys like Punk who do break through end up looking weak as fukk against the part timers.
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,794
Reputation
975
Daps
106,200
Punk with the title at 500 days vs. Taker and his streak at Mania would have been crazy :ohmy:.

Hell, so would the Rock vs. Bryan vs. Punk match that apparently was planned/talked about.

I remember wanting to see Bryan(World Champion) vs. John Cena vs. CM Punk(WWE Champion) main event Mania but that never came to be. Match could have been like that Beniot vs. Jericho vs. Angle match at Mania 2000, two falls with both titles on the line.
All great ideas and bigger draws than what they went with the last few years
 

23Barrettcity

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
35,454
Reputation
1,509
Daps
52,399
Reppin
NULL
I find it funny we shyt on creative , we find out punk shyts on creative and offers input to try and improve the product and then leaves but people are saying he should just be like well I'm rich :yeshrug: fukk everyone else . It's sad that more wrestlers aren't like him
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
124,280
Reputation
8,683
Daps
146,975
Reppin
Westcoast
Breh your missing the point :snoop: wwe saw rock as the future even as rocky Maivia , they weren't dragged kicking and screaming into pushing him like Bryan /punk . You can't believe that if rock beat up some robbers wwe would ignore that , or if Austin was at the World Series champs parade leading what chants they'd ignore it . Punk speaks to a problem within wwe , they know the product is hurting but refuse to embrace change like how they did in the attitude era


Well...he should of known better. He's not an idiot.
 

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,495
Reputation
-7,869
Daps
19,903
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
I agree with him on both. Now I'm not saying guys like Rock and Brock don't bring in buys for the PPV but continuing to depend on them at the big shows is why you're gonna continue to have to do that. Because you're not building up your current roster and the guys like Punk who do break through end up looking weak as fukk against the part timers.

Nobody was begging for a rock vs cena rematch except cena who wanted his win back
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
124,280
Reputation
8,683
Daps
146,975
Reppin
Westcoast
I don't think he should have went over Brock unless they had a wrestle mania rematch

He should have never dropped title to rock, rock vs Cena didn't need belt

Losing to triple h when he was as hot as anybody had been since stone cold and going thru the whole Kevin Nash thing was inexcusable


That doesn't make any sense...the ONLY reason Vince let him keep the belt was to be Rock's opponent. Bryan was the alternative. He used politics and still had to lose by January.
 

Honga Ciganesta

Japanese Keyhole Porn Don
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,798
Reputation
4,794
Daps
61,511
Holy shyt that doc sounds shady as fukk. Worst doctor since

Harold_Shipman_mug_shot.jpg


Hogan had it right about Vince working these dudes to the brink

''Ride the horse until it drops, shoot it, then eat the horse''
 

23Barrettcity

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
35,454
Reputation
1,509
Daps
52,399
Reppin
NULL
All great ideas and bigger draws than what they went with the last few years
They went for cheap buyrate spikes . :snoop: imagine how dope those angles would of been . :lupe: at punk creating the shield makes so much sense . Lol at rollins and reigns really being hhh guys , Ambrose be careful Breh
 

WOAHMYGOODNESS

Your TSC World Champion
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,637
Reputation
2,089
Daps
37,101
Don't accept the match. Simple. Kills all that crying shyt too.
All that does is continue the terrible booking cause likely they give it to a heel daniel bryan or orton basically all he other guys u call main event era year around until these guys come back
 

23Barrettcity

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
35,454
Reputation
1,509
Daps
52,399
Reppin
NULL
That doesn't make any sense...the ONLY reason Vince let him keep the belt was to be Rock's opponent. Bryan was the alternative. He used politics and still had to lose by January.
Oh god shut up . He didn't use politics they played him against Bryan like take the be a heel option for the rock or lose the belt . As a wwe wrestler your forced to play ball or like he was told we have another Indy darling waiting to take your spot .
 
Top