For true liberation, Black Lives Matter is not enough

Elle Driver

Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
27,401
Reputation
13,045
Daps
100,606
Reppin
At the beginning of mean streets
And here you are be willfully ignorant, just like the people that respond with #alllivesmatter.

You know exactly what the movement is about.


And using this logic you would been calling out Dr King, Malcom X and any other leader/movement. Cause none of them addressed ALL the issues at the same time.

This movement is nowhere near the work Dr. King and Malcolm X have done for the community. I wouldn't even call it a movement at all. Mass incarceration, the war of drugs came AFTER Dr. King and Malcolm's time, you're clearly the one who's playing ignorant. Like I said, if you're a black liberation movement then you're addressing the issues that work in conjuction with police brutality, not just police brutality. You're addressing poverty, high unemployment rates, the privatization of schools/prisons, the school to prison pipline, gentrification, etc. It's a matter of attacking Congress, attacking the war on drugs which grants police officers the money to use military armor and military tactics on it's citizens. Going straight to the source and fight against it.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,695
Reputation
3,789
Daps
109,742
Reppin
Tha Land
This movement is nowhere near the work Dr. King and Malcolm X have done for the community.
I never said it was. I said under your logic of "criticizing" things that aren't be all end all solutions, they would fall under your umbrella of criticism.

You like to build and attack strawman I see.


I wouldn't even call it a movement at all.
They have presidential candidates talking about black issues in a way they NEVER have before. Not even Obama talked about these issues while campaigning.

If that's all they get done, they've accomplished a lot.

Mass incarceration, the war of drugs came AFTER Dr. King and Malcolm's time, you're clearly the one who's playing ignorant. Like I said, if you're a black liberation movement then you're addressing the issues that work in conjuction with police brutality, not just police brutality. You're addressing poverty, high unemployment rates, the privatization of schools/prisons, the school to prison pipline, gentrification, etc. It's a matter of attacking Congress, attacking the war on drugs which grants police officers the money to use military armor and military tactics on it's citizens.
That's all great, but in the meantime what is wrong with advocating things like cameras on police officers and demilitarization?
 

Elle Driver

Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
27,401
Reputation
13,045
Daps
100,606
Reppin
At the beginning of mean streets
I never said it was. I said under your logic of "criticizing" things that aren't be all end all solutions, they would fall under your umbrella of criticism.

You like to build and attack strawman I see.



They have presidential candidates talking about black issues in a way they NEVER have before. Not even Obama talked about these issues while campaigning.

If that's all they get done, they've accomplished a lot.


That's all great, but in the meantime what is wrong with advocating things like cameras on police officers and demilitarization?

Nah, your point is "at least they're doing something". Which I think is dumb, no movement is infallible and you keep moving goal posts because you can't effectively rebut what I'm criticizing about them.

Obama is entering his final stage of presidency, he actually expanded the Bryne grant which funds police, prisons, law enforcement and courts to get "tough on crime" (i.e. put black people away for petty drug crimes and label them felons, branded by society and unable to work or find housing). I don't see a problem with advocating for cameras and demilitarization, but there's a strategic way of doing things. That's merely a symptom of a bigger problem here. They can put body cameras on them and demilitarize them, but that doesn't stop them from filling up prisons with more and more black people.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,695
Reputation
3,789
Daps
109,742
Reppin
Tha Land
Nah, your point is "at least they're doing something". Which I think is dumb, no movement is infallible and you keep moving goal posts because you can't effectively rebut what I'm criticizing about them.
Your criticism is based on broken logic.

They never claimed to be THE solution for all problems.

They are advocating SOME solutions to SOME problems.

You are attacking a strawman, just as you do with every post I make.

Obama is entering his final stage of presidency, he actually expanded the Bryne grant which funds police, prisons, law enforcement and courts to get "tough on crime" (i.e. put black people away for petty drug crimes and label them felons, branded by society and unable to work or find housing). I don't see a problem with advocating for cameras and demilitarization, but there's a strategic way of doing things. That's merely a symptom of a bigger problem here. They can put body cameras on them and demilitarize them, but that doesn't stop them from filling up prisons with more and more black people.

So if you catch a cold, you gone "criticize" Tylenol for not addressing the microbes that gave you the cold:stopitslime:
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,695
Reputation
3,789
Daps
109,742
Reppin
Tha Land
MLK was open to criticim and changed over time i.e. Poor People's Campaign
Who said BLM couldn't/wouldn't change?

They actually have heard and addressed criticisms

The "change" yall are asking for defies logic.

Like I said before it's like attacking Tylenol for not being antimicrobial.
 

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
24,673
Reputation
3,859
Daps
80,167
Reppin
NULL
I see nothing wrong with BLM,

they just need more direction as a movement....
 
Top