Who's refreshing Floyd's twitter?
And rightfully so. Pacquiao's resume would shyt all over Floyd's
And Pacquiao has more ring wear on him than Floyd does....and it's not even close. Pac has been fighting PROFESSIONALLY since 16 years old and has already fought 64 pro fights compared to Floyd's 47 fights.
2 years older doesnt mean anything in comparision between those 2. Pacquiao has more abuse/wear on his body easily
They shouldn't though. But of course you know damn well his stans will. Nobody should mention that, because Floyd has never accepted any caveats for other fighter's Ls.ESPN and Lampley started talking this bullshyt three years ago...
They will never give Floyd credit for whooping this dude...The fight needed to happen but it does nothing for Floyd other than make him the richest price fighter of all time...In terms of legacy they will treat this fight like Hopkins/Jones 2 if Floyd wins...
If pacauiao wins though thats a different storyline for the media...They wont mention Floyd being damn near 40 and 2 years older than Pacquiao...They wont mention his regression in speed...All you will hear about is how Pacquiao is the goat...
I believe 100% that Floyd is gonna win, but if Pacquiao won I would be like
100%I believe 100% that Floyd is gonna win, but if Pacquiao won I would be like
How?
Floyd's beating more champions and dominated for longer
let me guess Brandon Rios and Chris Algeri puts him over the top
what opponent on pacquiao's resume puts him over floyd
if floyd loses teddy atlas' of the world will blame it on his age
They shouldn't though. But of course you know damn well his stans will. Nobody should mention that, because Floyd has never accepted any caveats for other fighter's Ls.
Case in point, his argument with RA The Rugged Man:
RA: Floyd, why don't you wanna be known as the greatest?
FM: I am!
RA: Bullshyt! How can you be the greatest? You're not better than Sugar Ray Robinson. You're not even better than Sugar Ray Leonard!
FM: Oh, you mean the same Sugar Ray Leonard that got beat by Camacho, who was a lightweight, right?
RA:Oh cmon, he was 41 years old when he lost to Camacho!
FM: Well then he shouldn't have gotten in the ring then!
Those were Floyd's words. He tried to use Leonard's L against Camacho (where he was clearly past his prime) to justify saying he was better than Leonard. Didn't matter that he was past his prime, in Floyd's eyes an L is an L
Therefore if Floyd ever takes an L, I don't wanna hear any excuses coming from anybody
let me guess Brandon Rios and Chris Algeri puts him over the top
Him having Floyd Mayweather Jr himself is enough
Manny Pacquiao beats Floyd, his resume will have HOFers/HOF LOCKS like Erik Morales, Marco Antonio Barrera, Juan Manuel Marquez, Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton, Miguel Cotto, Shane Mosley, and Floyd Mayweather on it PLUS victories over people like Lehlo Ledwaba, Chatchai Sasakul, Emmanuel Lucero, Jorge Solis, Oscar Larios, Agapito Sanchez, David Diaz, Joshua Clottey, Antonio Margarito, Timothy Bradley, and Brandon Rios on his resume
It's almost like a watered down "who's-who" of 2000s Boxers
They shouldn't though. But of course you know damn well his stans will. Nobody should mention that, because Floyd has never accepted any caveats for other fighter's Ls.
Case in point, his argument with RA The Rugged Man:
RA: Floyd, why don't you wanna be known as the greatest?
FM: I am!
RA: Bullshyt! How can you be the greatest? You're not better than Sugar Ray Robinson. You're not even better than Sugar Ray Leonard!
FM: Oh, you mean the same Sugar Ray Leonard that got beat by Camacho, who was a lightweight, right?
RA:Oh cmon, he was 41 years old when he lost to Camacho!
FM: Well then he shouldn't have gotten in the ring then!
Those were Floyd's words. He tried to use Leonard's L against Camacho (where he was clearly past his prime) to justify saying he was better than Leonard. Didn't matter that he was past his prime, in Floyd's eyes an L is an L
Therefore if Floyd ever takes an L, I don't wanna hear any excuses coming from anybody
That's no different than Floyd beating Baldomir and Guerrero
Floyd is 38, he ain't gonna get no credit, just like Floyd ain't gonna get any credit for beating him
this is purely a money fight
it's always a double standard, floyd beats a guy, he's old, or too green lmao
Floyd loses at 38, nikka it's still Floyd, nevermnd he's always 40, don't work that way
Tarver ain't the goat because he beat Roy Jones lmao
All those fighters you listed were passed their best years when pac beat them anyway
the nerve to even put DLH up there is just ridiculous
Floyd has beaten more hall of famers and more champions all ready
Camacho isn't even suppose to be n Ray Leonard's class tho
Floyd would never lose to Camacho even if he was 42
Nobody brings that up as some kind of accomplishment
People act like Zab was 34, instead of 29 when Floyd beat him
People wanna act like Floyd didn't come out of retirement to beat Corrales who was undefeated knock out artist everybody said he was scared off
man I'm done with this conversation
Pac gets full credit for beating anyone no matter the circumstances anyway, no matter if their past there prime, weight trained, or otherwise
his best victory is against a past his prime Marquez
and he ducked Zahir Raheem