Floyd Mayweather Jr-Manny Pacquiao Master Discussion Thread

Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
And rightfully so. Pacquiao's resume would shyt all over Floyd's:mjlol:


And Pacquiao has more ring wear on him than Floyd does....and it's not even close. Pac has been fighting PROFESSIONALLY since 16 years old and has already fought 64 pro fights compared to Floyd's 47 fights.


2 years older doesnt mean anything in comparision between those 2. Pacquiao has more abuse/wear on his body easily

How?

Floyd's beating more champions and dominated for longer

let me guess Brandon Rios and Chris Algeri puts him over the top

what opponent on pacquiao's resume puts him over floyd

if floyd loses teddy atlas' of the world will blame it on his age
 

King P

Legends Never Die
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
15,420
Reputation
3,392
Daps
48,296
Reppin
Views From The X
ESPN and Lampley started talking this bullshyt three years ago...

They will never give Floyd credit for whooping this dude...The fight needed to happen but it does nothing for Floyd other than make him the richest price fighter of all time...In terms of legacy they will treat this fight like Hopkins/Jones 2 if Floyd wins...

If pacauiao wins though thats a different storyline for the media...They wont mention Floyd being damn near 40 and 2 years older than Pacquiao...They wont mention his regression in speed...All you will hear about is how Pacquiao is the goat...
They shouldn't though. But of course you know damn well his stans will. Nobody should mention that, because Floyd has never accepted any caveats for other fighter's Ls.

Case in point, his argument with RA The Rugged Man:

RA: Floyd, why don't you wanna be known as the greatest?
FM: I am!
RA: Bullshyt! How can you be the greatest? You're not better than Sugar Ray Robinson. You're not even better than Sugar Ray Leonard!
FM: Oh, you mean the same Sugar Ray Leonard that got beat by Camacho, who was a lightweight, right?
RA:Oh cmon, he was 41 years old when he lost to Camacho!
FM: Well then he shouldn't have gotten in the ring then!

Those were Floyd's words. He tried to use Leonard's L against Camacho (where he was clearly past his prime) to justify saying he was better than Leonard. Didn't matter that he was past his prime, in Floyd's eyes an L is an L

Therefore if Floyd ever takes an L, I don't wanna hear any excuses coming from anybody
 

TheNig

Dr.TheNig DDS
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,724
Reputation
5,624
Daps
113,553
Reppin
Brolic... Alcoholics
I believe 100% that Floyd is gonna win, but if Pacquiao won I would be like :damn::mjlol:

Dawg I'm really not sure. As someone pointed out earlier, Floyd ain't as fast and has been gettingb caught a lot more than he used to. Also I can't remember the last time he fought someone that can fight from angles.

We've seen what happens to Manny against a great counter puncher :deadmanny:

I would imagine him getting in there,throwing some combos, and getting out.


Like I've said for the past 2 years.... 7-5 either way.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
How?

Floyd's beating more champions and dominated for longer

let me guess Brandon Rios and Chris Algeri puts him over the top

what opponent on pacquiao's resume puts him over floyd

if floyd loses teddy atlas' of the world will blame it on his age


:dahell: Him having Floyd Mayweather Jr himself is enough :what:


Manny Pacquiao beats Floyd, his resume will have HOFers/HOF LOCKS like Erik Morales, Marco Antonio Barrera, Juan Manuel Marquez, Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton, Miguel Cotto, Shane Mosley, and Floyd Mayweather on it PLUS victories over people like Lehlo Ledwaba, Chatchai Sasakul, Emmanuel Lucero, Jorge Solis, Oscar Larios, Agapito Sanchez, David Diaz, Joshua Clottey, Antonio Margarito, Timothy Bradley, and Brandon Rios on his resume:ufdup:


It's almost like a watered down "who's-who" of 2000s Boxers:wow:
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
They shouldn't though. But of course you know damn well his stans will. Nobody should mention that, because Floyd has never accepted any caveats for other fighter's Ls.

Case in point, his argument with RA The Rugged Man:

RA: Floyd, why don't you wanna be known as the greatest?
FM: I am!
RA: Bullshyt! How can you be the greatest? You're not better than Sugar Ray Robinson. You're not even better than Sugar Ray Leonard!
FM: Oh, you mean the same Sugar Ray Leonard that got beat by Camacho, who was a lightweight, right?
RA:Oh cmon, he was 41 years old when he lost to Camacho!
FM: Well then he shouldn't have gotten in the ring then!

Those were Floyd's words. He tried to use Leonard's L against Camacho (where he was clearly past his prime) to justify saying he was better than Leonard. Didn't matter that he was past his prime, in Floyd's eyes an L is an L

Therefore if Floyd ever takes an L, I don't wanna hear any excuses coming from anybody


Yep, if Floyd loses...he set himself up for everything that would come his way. No excuses will be allowed, because he never accepted any excuses when he talked down on the Legends:yeshrug:
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
:dahell: Him having Floyd Mayweather Jr himself is enough :what:


Manny Pacquiao beats Floyd, his resume will have HOFers/HOF LOCKS like Erik Morales, Marco Antonio Barrera, Juan Manuel Marquez, Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton, Miguel Cotto, Shane Mosley, and Floyd Mayweather on it PLUS victories over people like Lehlo Ledwaba, Chatchai Sasakul, Emmanuel Lucero, Jorge Solis, Oscar Larios, Agapito Sanchez, David Diaz, Joshua Clottey, Antonio Margarito, Timothy Bradley, and Brandon Rios on his resume:ufdup:


It's almost like a watered down "who's-who" of 2000s Boxers:wow:

Floyd is 38, he ain't gonna get no credit, just like Floyd ain't gonna get any credit for beating him
this is purely a money fight

it's always a double standard, floyd beats a guy, he's old, or too green lmao

Floyd loses at 38, nikka it's still Floyd, nevermnd he's always 40, don't work that way

Tarver ain't the goat because he beat Roy Jones lmao

All those fighters you listed were passed their best years when pac beat them anyway

the nerve to even put DLH up there is just ridiculous

Floyd has beaten more hall of famers and more champions all ready
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
They shouldn't though. But of course you know damn well his stans will. Nobody should mention that, because Floyd has never accepted any caveats for other fighter's Ls.

Case in point, his argument with RA The Rugged Man:

RA: Floyd, why don't you wanna be known as the greatest?
FM: I am!
RA: Bullshyt! How can you be the greatest? You're not better than Sugar Ray Robinson. You're not even better than Sugar Ray Leonard!
FM: Oh, you mean the same Sugar Ray Leonard that got beat by Camacho, who was a lightweight, right?
RA:Oh cmon, he was 41 years old when he lost to Camacho!
FM: Well then he shouldn't have gotten in the ring then!

Those were Floyd's words. He tried to use Leonard's L against Camacho (where he was clearly past his prime) to justify saying he was better than Leonard. Didn't matter that he was past his prime, in Floyd's eyes an L is an L

Therefore if Floyd ever takes an L, I don't wanna hear any excuses coming from anybody

Camacho isn't even suppose to be n Ray Leonard's class tho

Floyd would never lose to Camacho even if he was 42
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
That's no different than Floyd beating Baldomir and Guerrero

Nobody brings that up as some kind of accomplishment

People act like Zab was 34, instead of 29 when Floyd beat him

People wanna act like Floyd didn't come out of retirement to beat Corrales who was undefeated knock out artist everybody said he was scared off

man I'm done with this conversation

Pac gets full credit for beating anyone no matter the circumstances anyway, no matter if their past there prime, weight trained, or otherwise

his best victory is against a past his prime Marquez

and he ducked Zahir Raheem
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
Floyd is 38, he ain't gonna get no credit, just like Floyd ain't gonna get any credit for beating him
this is purely a money fight

it's always a double standard, floyd beats a guy, he's old, or too green lmao

Floyd loses at 38, nikka it's still Floyd, nevermnd he's always 40, don't work that way

Tarver ain't the goat because he beat Roy Jones lmao

All those fighters you listed were passed their best years when pac beat them anyway

the nerve to even put DLH up there is just ridiculous

Floyd has beaten more hall of famers and more champions all ready



This is just a totally ridiculous post that doesnt warrant a response:mjlol:



Obviously, stuff like THIS is what Floyd stans are gonna be posting if he loses:snoop:



:camby:
 

TheNig

Dr.TheNig DDS
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,724
Reputation
5,624
Daps
113,553
Reppin
Brolic... Alcoholics
Nobody brings that up as some kind of accomplishment

People act like Zab was 34, instead of 29 when Floyd beat him

People wanna act like Floyd didn't come out of retirement to beat Corrales who was undefeated knock out artist everybody said he was scared off

man I'm done with this conversation

Pac gets full credit for beating anyone no matter the circumstances anyway, no matter if their past there prime, weight trained, or otherwise

his best victory is against a past his prime Marquez

and he ducked Zahir Raheem

And who brings up Rios and Algieri as some sort of accomplishment?

And the case could be made that Floyd ducked the Punisher.
 
Top