Got damn it’s makes so much sense by looking at it that wayyou're right. what they're doing is LIVE re-runs
Got damn it’s makes so much sense by looking at it that wayyou're right. what they're doing is LIVE re-runs
Smackdown is following Raw in its rating dive, dropping to tie the USA Network low for the show. Tuesday night’s episode brought in a 0.54 rating and 1.833 million viewers, down a rough 24% and 12% from last week’s 0.71 demo rating and 2.072 million viewers. The demo rating matched the 0.54 for the July 3rd, 2018 episode, while the viewership was the lowest since the February 5th, 2019 episode brought in 1.841 million against the State of the Union address.
Smackdown ranked #7 for the night among cable originals per Showbuzz Daily, well below what it usually does. The two NBA playoff games topped the night (2.43 demo rating/6.073 million viewers and 1.66/4.044 million), followed by the post-game show (0.95/2.213 million), Curse of Oak Island on History (0.67/3.321 million), Real Housewives of Beverly Hills (0.59/1.699 million) and the NHL Semifinals game (0.58/1.664 million). Obviously, Smackdown was up against some hefty competition in the sports playoff games and the Rockets vs. Warriors game drew a huge rating, but it still was not a good night for the show in any context.
I don't get it. People got what they wanted: Seth as champion, Becky ("Two Belts" lol) as champion, Kofi as champion, Brock off their TV sets...and viewership numbers drop. You watch and bytch and moan about needing to get the belt off Brock and that Seth should be the one to beat him, Becky Lynch needs to win at WM, and Kofi needs to overcome the odds and beat the man who ironically had the same path to the belt at WM 5 years ago, it happens and you tune out! Make up your minds, folks!
A quote from one of the shills
Maybe cause the show is
That Smackdown thread was barebones and Raws
WWE is reminding me of TNA in the mid 2010s, nothing but bad reports
They've been producing live reruns of their show for the last decade now.
This is the correct answer. That’s when they began the practice of sabotaging the faces they didn’t want at the top and feeding everyone to the face they want that the crowd doesn’t want. As bad as it could be at times from 2002-05, heels were booked like heels and faces were booked like faces so the show felt coherent. They also weren’t in the business of having main event caliber guys feuding over the IC and US titles just to give them something to do. They had an effective formula that they completely went away from solely because it was getting guys over enough to become mainstream stars.I'd argue that it started when Cena was moved to RAW in 2005.
The smarks get what they want and who they want to headline and win belts
the casuals dont care about those characters and dont watch
The smarks get what they want and who they want to headline and win belts
the casuals dont care about those characters and dont watch