We will be fair and acknowledge that he was taking part in criminal activity should it be proven right?
This seems to be spinning into a 'he was shot while minding hid own business' situation, when the details are not all clear yet.
if he wasn't taking part in criminal activity at the time of the crime, and it appears he wasn't, it doesn't matter if he was a criminal.
the story the police is running with is absolute bullshyt and there are tons of witnesses that are telling the same exact story, a story much different than what the police say happened.