Too many contradicting stories, I don't know what to trust or believe anymore brehs. I'm completely bamboozled.
People saying this and that.
I read some where that Mike Brown robbed that store and then some where that it wasn't him. The owner said it wasn't him or his lawyer said it. But then they say that story is fake.
But then they say the video was timestamped in June. And someone mention the guy in the robbery video was wearing sandals but the picture of Mike Brown on the street hes wearing boots.
And all this hoopla about autopsy reports. The family has one done but people dismiss it.
Now they are saying the autopsy report support Wilson and his hands weren't up.
But then I look at this contractor video and they are at the scene and say he has his hands up. But they are saying it's fake or they're lying.
I don't know what believe or trust brehs. Im lost. All I got is that video to go off of
I will simplify it for you by saying a couple things.
First off, the Department Of Justice asked the Ferguson PD not to release the video of the store incident, as it would only confuse people. The PD did it any way and guess what....it confused people.
For the record the clerk never called the cops, and never claimed Mike Brown stole anything. This is an easily researched fact.
Secondly, the grand jury prosecutor Bob Mcculloch is from a family of police....his dad was a cop, murked on the job by a black man....he was repeatedly asked to recuse himself from prosecuting Darren Wilson, as it was an obvious conflict of interest. In his entire career he's never once successfully indicted a police officer....which means he's either incredibly incompetent or has an agenda.
The sole purpose for a prosecutor is to get an indictment. This isn't my opinion....there's an old law saying, "a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich, if the prosecutor wants it".
Bob Mcculloch repeatedly dropped the ball during the grand jury....you're supposed to focus on a narrow scope of facts, to get an indictment. Instead he dropped nearly
5000 pages worth of info on the jury then basically told them "sort it out". He let Darren Wilson give his side of the story, for 4 hours....which is virtually unheard of in a grand jury setting. Also he never cross examined him.
In the press conference after the grand jury decision Witness 10 is the sole person McCulloch kept referring to....because his version of what happened aligned with Wilson's....but witness 10 was then exposed as lying their ass off about the distance between himself, and the altercation between Wilson/Brown. He initially said 300 feet then, under oath, cut it in half to 150 feet.
Now....if you can't tell a difference of
150 feet how reliable are you really?
Another witness, #40, agreed 100% with Darren Wilson's version of what happened. Oh but wait....witness 40 has a history of racism, mental illness, and couldn't even prove they were there when it happened:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat..._player_witness_unreliability_history_of.html
I could do this all night man. This thread is full of gems.
So I don't blame you for being confused....this was intentional. You have to do hard research to know
anything about this case, and that's exactly what Mcculloch wanted.
Fred.
