Ferguson police execute an unarmed 17 yr old boy (Update: Ferguson police chief to resign 3/19)
- Thread starter Canon
- Start date
Just saying.
We aren't defeating Cac supremacy until we industrialize Black nations by connecting the diaspora via trade of goods and services and investment in land, businesses and labor.
I agree with that...However without a means to defend ourselves that will not happen....that as well as agricultural sciences are needed...why are you refusing to acknowledge that?
Do you really think cops would feel so powerful about killing black youth if they knew if they did wrong there was a chance that they would receive repercussions in the middle of the night. Or if someone like Zimmerman was used as an example...not advocating vigilante justice nut more so if it happen I think that would change a lot of stuff.
Just imagine if Wilson was beheaded Middle eastern style.
Who denied that?
Terrorist sleeper cells in America is something wholly different than self-defense
Who denied that?
Terrorist sleeper cells in America is something wholly different than self-defense
I didn't say anything about making a terrorist sleeping cell...my brother this is the second time you've said I have made a statement in which I didn't.
You co-signed someone who did. My mistake if that isn't your argument.
christinasade
Banned
Marcus Garvey never advocated terrorism
see i think poiter may be alittle bias simply cause his moms is white
and who the hell wants to see their mom killed ya know?
christinasade
Banned
christinasade
Banned
This may be the dumbest post in this thread.
"However the point is that it was an insurgency on multiple fronts fighting against an enemy that had more/better weaponry as well as an indigenous population."
An insurgency is an armed rebellion against a constituted authority (for example, an authority recognized as such by the United Nations) when those taking part in the rebellion are not recognized as belligerents.[1] An insurgency can be fought via counter-insurgencywarfare, and may also be opposed by measures to protect the population, and by political and economic actions of various kinds aimed at undermining the insurgents' claims against the incumbent regime.[2] The nature of insurgencies is an ambiguous concept.
If you don't realize that the USA did that shyt than your tripping...also remember the Boston Tea Party....would that be considered a terrorist attack?
An insurgency is an armed rebellion against a constituted authority (for example, an authority recognized as such by the United Nations) when those taking part in the rebellion are not recognized as belligerents.[1] An insurgency can be fought via counter-insurgencywarfare, and may also be opposed by measures to protect the population, and by political and economic actions of various kinds aimed at undermining the insurgents' claims against the incumbent regime.[2] The nature of insurgencies is an ambiguous concept.
If you don't realize that the USA did that shyt than your tripping...also remember the Boston Tea Party....would that be considered a terrorist attack?
The British were ruling from across the pond, surely you see the difference?
Was there not an American Revolution? Why did they revolt? the Brits had more weapons, better weapons, more money and so on right?
Do you realize that the British were ruling from across the pond?
They also didn't have "better weapons", "more money" and "more weapons"
You can't be serious...so the people who were ruling from across the pond didn't have more resources and funding than the people they were ruling....Just admit it...America was built on revolution...South America as well, Haiti as well....And other places also...So what's wrong with encouraging revolution? It's multiple places in the world at this point and time in the revolution process.
Do you think the people are concerned that they may be out manned or under equipped? no they just change the tendencies.
I don't get why you have a hard time admitting that America was built upon revolution...