FD Signifier is LIVE RIGHT NOW. Telling haters to pull up - Calls Aba a c00n and anti-Black

audemarzz

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
11,382
Reputation
9,611
Daps
52,573
Could y'all stop it with these thinly veiled racist/classist tropes? "Oh y'all too ratchet to understand the sophistry of this male jezebel"
If he's so smart, why doesn't he debate Dr. Curry on Social Dominance Theory/Outgroup Male Target Hypothesis vs (unproven, untested, easy to crumble) Intersectionality?
It'll be Data AND "mass lived experience" vs K Crenshaw's emotional empowerment finesse.
Simps lie, hoes lie, numbers skew, but facts are facts. He doesn't deal in fact if he's embracing a theory that looks funny in the light after phds who matriculated (unlike somebody) DID THE WORK.
@karim I already mentioned the bytch, go pop a truvada and live another day
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,435
Reputation
5,667
Daps
73,709
Reppin
NULL
When did I bring up education as the qualifier?

Theres a difference between education & intelligence...
Fair enough but the premise still betrays you because FD and people like him use their education to flex on nikkas with word salads and thinly veiled, falsely sanctimonious talking points

You may not use education as the qualifier but he definitely does.

And at this point the whole "You're beneath me if you haven't read Bell Hooks/we can't even speak about blacness if you're not including trans issues" shyt is a trope that he's squeezing the last bit of juice out of
 
Last edited:

AngryBaby

Superstar
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,654
Reputation
255
Daps
13,103
Both genders of gentrifier voted for him - twice. White women outnumber white men.
They voted for Obama more than Killary but turned around and voted for Trump. Both were propped up and popularized by whites, because they're SAFE intellectuals and politically docile.
Bbbbbut "angry comments"
:camby:
Goofball jamal
But the vast majority of white males vote decisively republican. They were barely responsible for barrack...

My point stands, the Trump push, culturally, largely was a reaction to that term and the potential cultural shifts that were happening.

Now if you want to talk about barrack still being a political status quo, I'd probably agree. But the idea of him, was a bit of an issue clearly for white males especially.

But the Neil shyt? They cant stand that dude now. Asking for his IQ score constantly, asking whether he invented anything, when they dont ask the same of less educated people like lex fridman or joe rogan or Elon.

White right wingers aint about neil.
 

AngryBaby

Superstar
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,654
Reputation
255
Daps
13,103
Fair enough but the premise still betrays you because FD and people like him use their education to flex on nikkas with word salads and thinly veiled, falsely sanctimonious talking points

You may not use education as the qualifier but he definitely does.

And at this point the whole "You're beneath me if you haven't read Bell Hooks/we can't even speak about blacness if you're not including trans issues" shyt is a trope that he's squeezing the last bit of juice out of
So you dont agree with him on that particular premise
Neither do I really.

But im not going to sit here and act like thats all of his content, or that he creates bad content. Thats the difference
My initial post was referring to those will have an issue with this guy, but turn around and consistently listen to samuels, or umar, or tariq. Makes no sense to me.
 

O.Red

Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
18,435
Reputation
5,667
Daps
73,709
Reppin
NULL
Nah, white people dont like me actually, my combination of checking them on their talking points but also knowing their game, is a problematic combination for them. I make them uncomfortable. You however, you're exactly what they expect, they are likely more comfortable with you than they are with me...

You're the expectation.
There's no nuance in this take and it's largely one of the reasons black folks get finessed so easily. You're only telling half the story

There is nothing white liberals love more than being told how awful white people are. It's a form of self flagellation that also serves as a punishment for their self serving white guilt.

These are the white people that can't wait to tell you've they've read White Fragility, voted for Obama(twice!), and how much they hate those racist Republicans.(with little regard for their own racism)

These same white liberals preach the values of socialism while driving their Audi's to their $300,000 homes, fleecing the poorer white liberals that believe their socialist utopian bullshyt.

THESE are the white people that love FD Signifier and make up the majority of his fanbase. This is why some of us call him a phony and hit him with the :scust: because if you have enough perspective you've seen this bullshyt before.

FD wins some of y'all with the "he calls out white people" shyt while having this enormous blind spot of white liberals fetish for being called out. What you call "checking white people" is not a one size fits all deal for this very reason

Black folks put far too much pride in "checking" people when most of the time it has no tangible function outside of thinking you've won an argument, temporarily embarrassing a conservative, or giving white liberals exactly what they were looking for

Nikkas that don't like FD see him for what he is. He's an attack dog for black feminists, who are attack dogs for white feminists, who at the end of the day are still white women
 
Last edited:

audemarzz

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
11,382
Reputation
9,611
Daps
52,573
Fair enough but the premise still betrays you because FD and people like him use their education to flex on nikkas with word salads and thinly veiled, falsely sanctimonious talking points

You may not use education as the qualifier but he definitely does.

And at this point the whole "You're beneath me if you haven't read Bell Hooks" shyt is a trope that he's squeezing the last bit of juice out of

So you dont agree with him on that particular premise
Neither do I really.

But im not going to sit here and act like thats all of his content, or that he creates bad content. Thats the difference
My initial post was referring to those will have an issue with this guy, but turn around and consistently listen to samuels, or umar, or tariq. Makes no sense to me.
Umar is a goofy
Tariq is a flip flopper
KS was trying too hard to unite families in this climate. Nah.
Save the strawmen.
 

AngryBaby

Superstar
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,654
Reputation
255
Daps
13,103
There's no nuance in this take and it's largely one of the reasons black folks get finessed so easily. You're only telling half the story

There is nothing white liberals love more than being told how awful white people are. It's a form of self flagellation that also serves as a punishment for their self serving white guilt.

These are the white people that can't wait to tell you've they've read White Fragility, voted for Obama(twice!), and how much they hate those racist Republicans.(with little regard for their own racism)

These same white liberals preach the values of socialism while driving their Audi's to their $300,000 homes, fleecing the poorer white liberals that believe their socialist utopian bullshyt.

THESE are the white people that love FD Signifier and make up the majority of his fanbase. This is why some of us call him a phony and hit him with the :scust: because if you have enough perspective you've seen this bullshyt before.

FD wins some of y'all with the "he calls out white people" shyt while having this enormous blind spot of white liberals fetish for being called out. What you call "checking white people" is not a one size fits all deal for this very reason

Black folks put far too much pride in "checking" people when most of the time it has no tangible function outside of thinking you won an argument, temporarily embarrassing a conservative, or giving a white liberals exactly what they were looking for

Nikkas that don't like FD see him for what he is. He's an attack dog for black feminists, who are attack dogs for white feminists, who at the end of the day are still white women


Checking is necessary, people say lowkey ignorant fukk shyt, all the time these days and you have to be equipped for that. They looove the idea of the ignorant negro who they can bring some shyt up to and hes not equipped to respond or educate. My only point is, they dont hang out with nikkas that can do that. Trust me. Which is enough for me.

I just go off of how much do they like being around me, when they suddenly disappear like they always do. Thats a good sign.
 

Legend27

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
687
Reputation
50
Daps
1,461
They're similar in background and personality to people who've spent a large amount of time in college. I didn't compare their ideology and worldview. That girl is too naive when it comes to a certain types of white people because she pretty much grew up "white".

It's a falsehood and it's created by a chink that dislikes black people and kowtows to white people. For them to pretty much repost it and mostly agree with it because he referenced TikTok videos is a show of them being disingenuous.
Not entirely. Idk the Asian dude enough but If he said all blk people or everybody was being anti-white they yeah that would definitely be a falsehood. All they doing is highlighting extreme and unhinged people in a specific echo chambers being racist which in my generation is definitely becoming more common.
 

The Plug

plug couldnt trust you now u cant trust the plug
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,892
Reputation
829
Daps
18,223
Not entirely. Idk the Asian dude enough but If he said all blk people or everybody was being anti-white they yeah that would definitely be a falsehood. All they doing is highlighting extreme and unhinged people in a specific echo chambers being racist which in my generation is definitely becoming more common.
Then you should probably watch a bit more of that Asian guys videos, they're directly connected to each other. No, that's not all he's doing, he doesn't think these are "extreme" outliers, he believes it's the norm.
 

Legend27

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
687
Reputation
50
Daps
1,461
Then you should probably watch a bit more of that Asian guys videos, they're directly connected to each other. No, that's not all he's doing, he doesn't think these are "extreme" outliers, he believes it's the norm.
If that’s the case then how does that reflect negatively on anybody that only reacted to the original video if they gotta watch different videos tho?
 

The Plug

plug couldnt trust you now u cant trust the plug
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
6,892
Reputation
829
Daps
18,223
If that’s the case then how does that reflect negatively on anybody that only reacted to the original video if they gotta watch different videos tho?
They are agreeing with him, are you daft? They didn't just watch the video and then say "ok folks, like and subscribe".
 

Legend27

Pro
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
687
Reputation
50
Daps
1,461
They are agreeing with him, are you daft? They didn't just watch the video and then say "ok folks, like and subscribe".
Yeah, they agreed that there is some anti-whiteness with some people doing it and they believe everybody should make jokes about everybody what’s the issue?
 

karim

Superstar
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
11,220
Reputation
-70
Daps
42,074
Reppin
NULL
Could y'all stop it with these thinly veiled racist/classist tropes? "Oh y'all too ratchet to understand the sophistry of this male jezebel"
If he's so smart, why doesn't he debate Dr. Curry on Social Dominance Theory/Outgroup Male Target Hypothesis vs (unproven, untested, easy to crumble) Intersectionality?
It'll be Data AND "mass lived experience" vs K Crenshaw's emotional empowerment finesse.
Simps lie, hoes lie, numbers skew, but facts are facts. He doesn't deal in fact if he's embracing a theory that looks funny in the light after phds who matriculated (unlike somebody) DID THE WORK.
:mjlol: I'm pretty sure your retarded ass can't even explain what intersectionality is. Sounding like a fukking maga cac complaining about critical race theory :mjpls::camby:
 

audemarzz

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
11,382
Reputation
9,611
Daps
52,573
:mjlol: I'm pretty sure your retarded ass can't even explain what intersectionality is. Sounding like a fukking maga cac complaining about critical race theory :mjpls::camby:
More insults, "Sounding like a fukking maga cac" First of all B I T C H, fukk maga, and fukk you. "You can't even explain it" It's funny how I know all the actors, I know about the GM case that set the alleged precedent, and the "I'm doubly discriminated against because I'm black and female, and these intersect, because standpoint says so" fukkouttahea F A G G O T, dig your mother up if that bytch dead.
 
Top