If the director is disowning their flick before it drops what more evidence do u need? That's for people criticizing RT. usually when the score is in the 50 - 70 percent range it's a toss up but when a rating leans so far one way it's probably accurate.
The run time on this is a dead give away. This is a stand alone origins flick so it should be a minimum of 2 hours. Instead it's like 90 minutes. Ant Man was a little longer but they got away with it because ant man is a piece to a bigger puzzle.
This movie was fukked from the beginning by how they cast the main characters. Wallace wasn't the best choice but if u gonna make that radical a change to the source material you gotta have a killer story and script. Fox is just lazy. They really think people will show up to any comic book movie now a days just because it's a super hero flick. I hope audiences don't fall into this trap and make it number 1 this weekend
There it is
The perfect example of the mcu fan boyism.
Lets judge and nitpick every non mcu film by a set of standards that we wont apply to mcu films because reasons.
Always.
ALWAYS an excuse as to why its not okay for a non mcu film to do it but its accectable for mcu.
MCU stan on fox or sony film character that differs from comics "they ruined this character,why do they have to change things from the comics give the rights to marvel"
MCU stan on mcu film that changes character from the comics "OMG I LOVED IT. THE CHARACTER WOULD NOT HAVE WORKED ON FILM MARVEL ARE GENIUSES"
MCU stan on RT when they give high score to non mcu film they dont like " who cares about RT,just a bunch of hipster and old cacs,movie was terrible"
MCU stan on RT when they give low score to non mcu film " I told you it was terrible!!!! Ive known since the first time I saw marvel wasnt making it. RT is never wrong!!!