After reviewing this case and all talking points
I've come up with the facts around this case.
I would like to first start off and say, the media handling of this case has caused a lot of confusion, and also this case as revealed the stupidity of most people in this country.
My position is Zimmerman is to blame for this and the semantics of white of America will not save him.
However, black folks need to take in the facts and make the right ARGUMENT against Trayvon, look over the trail on youtube and not rely on CNN or other media outlets, because they have mislead you.
Celebrities are making it easier for Zimmerman's image in the public man by spouting nonsensical jargon.
Game, put a picture of up with his son next to a picture of Trayvon, when clearly this is a young picture of him not who was on that night.
In Game's mind he sees a helpless boy and in the minds of many people
Also whites have actually confused Trayvon with the Game, because of google searches, where game's image actually comes up as Trayvon because of the reference he has made.
You got Wade talking crazy, talking about how is he going to explain this to his kids.
Trayvon WAS NOT A BOY. He was 17 years old. In order to WIN YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE RIGHT ARGUMENTS. But constantly referring to this man as a boy you already putting yourself in a losing situation.
Misconceptions I had going in were about the area the situation happened
when they mentioned gated community I thought of an upper class area on some fresh prince of bel-air shyt. Not some shabby apartment complex or whatever it was.
There's no nothing suspicious about anybody walking around such an area, especially with so many units in the vicinity.
Defense dominated the trail, focusing the entire trail on the POINTS THEY WANTED TO FOCUS ON TO MAKE IT FAVORABLE FOR ZIMMERMAN
Even the debates on CNN focus only on the part of the situation which is clearly in FAVOR OF ZIMMERMAN.
This is a tactic the defense attorney used to get people to accept his vision of what happened.
I learned this same tactic as a door to door salesmen, when I would literally convinced people into signing things they never intended to sign and initial told me no.
FACTS
The Witnesses all verified NOTHING
Goodman, the guy closest to the action, COULD SEE NOTHING
defense attorney tried to put words in his mouth, and he worded his questions so when he answered it would appear as if he were agreeing with him.
The fact is, Goodman stated the person with the dark clothes, which would be Trayvon was on top of the other person. You could never see a face, and could never ID anyone.
He used to the term Ground and Pound to describe the positioning, which should have been objected because in the same breath he said HE COULD NOT TELL IF THE PERSON ON TYPE WERE THROWING PUNCHES OR NOT, HE COULD NOT SEE
The term Ground and Pound suggest someone is on top pummeling the person on the bottom. The correct word he should have used was MOUNTED.
Keep in mind he never sees the gun, and IS IN DOORS WHEN THE GUNSHOT GOES OFF, He doesn't know if They got back to their feet when the shot fired, or what happened.
The Asian lady, she stated the larger man was the one on top, and later realized it to be Zimmerman after seeing pictures. He was the one on top, when she had looked out the window.
Once again she went back in doors before the gun shot occurred, when he looked back out again
TRAYVON WAS LYING ON THE GROUND BY HIMSELF, ZIMMERMAN WAS NOT AROUND
this are her own words.
So From these two eye witnesses
Apparently, the two were in a struggle at some point, Trayvon was on top at on point and Zimmerman at another.
Judging by the asian lady's testimony she was watching first before the neighbor closest "goodman" came outside.
So Zimmerman had Trayvon mounted FIRST, by the time Goodman came outside the tide had changed in Trayvon's favor.
Both of these eye witnesses HEARD THE GUN SHOT, but DID NOT SEE IT FIRED, AND NEVER SAW THE GUN
AND NONE OF THEM EVER SAW SOMEONE GETTING THEIR HEAD BASHED IN
Also a lot of their testimony was filled with unsure, can't remembers, and not certains. They don't even know what the fukk happend themselves.
But fukk ALL THAT
To get Zimmerman's ass out of here you have to PROVE HE DID NOT HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO BE THERE WITH THAT GUN
Meaning, he was using the GUN IN AN UNLAWFUL MANOR
The fight is irrelevant to the argument for people against Zimmerman
the fight is what the defense wanted you to focus on, becasue there's no one to witness who started, or what finished it
You cannot focus on this point, because you will lose it, because no one can prove exactly what transpired.
The nail in Zimmerman's coffin comes before anything popped off.
The Neighborhood Watchman testified THAT THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO CARRY FIRE ARMS
Now, being a CCW holder myself I know the laws surrounding this.
You can take your guns anywhere accept Schools, Federal Buildings, National Parks, and places were alcohol is primarily sold for consumption.
HOWEVER, ANY PRIVATE ENTITY CAN PROHIBIT FIREARMS, and YOU HAVE TO COMPLY, because you no longer have the LEGAL RIGHT TO BE THERE WITH THE FIREARM
Example, if I worked as a security guard a grocery store and had a CCW
but my boss told fire arms are not allowed at work.
I would not be able to keep my weapon with while at work, I'd have to leave it in my car.
If I were to violate that, and get caught with my weapon, I WOULD BE CHARGED WITH ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF A FIREARM, because I've been told firearms are banned from the workplace.
Zimmerman was never suppose to have a gun on him in the first place.
And we all know his bytch ass would have never followed Trayvon if he didn't have a weapon on him.
So before the confrontation Zimmerman is wrong and has broken the law.
This is what needs to be made clear, not trying to twist around the talking points of the defense.
Zimmerman, a man who has assaulted a police officer, beat up his ex-girlfriend, is clearly someone who should not be allowed to handle a weapon, because he is violent person incapable of rational thought.
A rational person armed with weapon would have never been in this situation in the first place.
Have CCW is a double edge sword, shyt can get you locked up more ways than it can save your life.
Zimmerman's legal right to be there most be challenged
everything else is irrelevant, because it is all speculation and theory
Neighborhood Watch coordinated
instructed them all not to follow people not to engage people and not carry weapons
HE DISOBEYED ALL OF THOSE just like a FELON DOES, they break laws
George Zimmerman is a felon, who got a clean slate because of his daddy
this has to be made clear. He is the criminal PROTECTED by his father his entire life not Trayvon who's done nothing but be a normal teeanger
I've come up with the facts around this case.
I would like to first start off and say, the media handling of this case has caused a lot of confusion, and also this case as revealed the stupidity of most people in this country.
My position is Zimmerman is to blame for this and the semantics of white of America will not save him.
However, black folks need to take in the facts and make the right ARGUMENT against Trayvon, look over the trail on youtube and not rely on CNN or other media outlets, because they have mislead you.
Celebrities are making it easier for Zimmerman's image in the public man by spouting nonsensical jargon.
Game, put a picture of up with his son next to a picture of Trayvon, when clearly this is a young picture of him not who was on that night.
In Game's mind he sees a helpless boy and in the minds of many people
Also whites have actually confused Trayvon with the Game, because of google searches, where game's image actually comes up as Trayvon because of the reference he has made.
You got Wade talking crazy, talking about how is he going to explain this to his kids.
Trayvon WAS NOT A BOY. He was 17 years old. In order to WIN YOU HAVE TO MAKE THE RIGHT ARGUMENTS. But constantly referring to this man as a boy you already putting yourself in a losing situation.
Misconceptions I had going in were about the area the situation happened
when they mentioned gated community I thought of an upper class area on some fresh prince of bel-air shyt. Not some shabby apartment complex or whatever it was.
There's no nothing suspicious about anybody walking around such an area, especially with so many units in the vicinity.
Defense dominated the trail, focusing the entire trail on the POINTS THEY WANTED TO FOCUS ON TO MAKE IT FAVORABLE FOR ZIMMERMAN
Even the debates on CNN focus only on the part of the situation which is clearly in FAVOR OF ZIMMERMAN.
This is a tactic the defense attorney used to get people to accept his vision of what happened.
I learned this same tactic as a door to door salesmen, when I would literally convinced people into signing things they never intended to sign and initial told me no.
FACTS
The Witnesses all verified NOTHING
Goodman, the guy closest to the action, COULD SEE NOTHING
defense attorney tried to put words in his mouth, and he worded his questions so when he answered it would appear as if he were agreeing with him.
The fact is, Goodman stated the person with the dark clothes, which would be Trayvon was on top of the other person. You could never see a face, and could never ID anyone.
He used to the term Ground and Pound to describe the positioning, which should have been objected because in the same breath he said HE COULD NOT TELL IF THE PERSON ON TYPE WERE THROWING PUNCHES OR NOT, HE COULD NOT SEE
The term Ground and Pound suggest someone is on top pummeling the person on the bottom. The correct word he should have used was MOUNTED.
Keep in mind he never sees the gun, and IS IN DOORS WHEN THE GUNSHOT GOES OFF, He doesn't know if They got back to their feet when the shot fired, or what happened.
The Asian lady, she stated the larger man was the one on top, and later realized it to be Zimmerman after seeing pictures. He was the one on top, when she had looked out the window.
Once again she went back in doors before the gun shot occurred, when he looked back out again
TRAYVON WAS LYING ON THE GROUND BY HIMSELF, ZIMMERMAN WAS NOT AROUND
this are her own words.
So From these two eye witnesses
Apparently, the two were in a struggle at some point, Trayvon was on top at on point and Zimmerman at another.
Judging by the asian lady's testimony she was watching first before the neighbor closest "goodman" came outside.
So Zimmerman had Trayvon mounted FIRST, by the time Goodman came outside the tide had changed in Trayvon's favor.
Both of these eye witnesses HEARD THE GUN SHOT, but DID NOT SEE IT FIRED, AND NEVER SAW THE GUN
AND NONE OF THEM EVER SAW SOMEONE GETTING THEIR HEAD BASHED IN
Also a lot of their testimony was filled with unsure, can't remembers, and not certains. They don't even know what the fukk happend themselves.
But fukk ALL THAT
To get Zimmerman's ass out of here you have to PROVE HE DID NOT HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO BE THERE WITH THAT GUN
Meaning, he was using the GUN IN AN UNLAWFUL MANOR
The fight is irrelevant to the argument for people against Zimmerman
the fight is what the defense wanted you to focus on, becasue there's no one to witness who started, or what finished it
You cannot focus on this point, because you will lose it, because no one can prove exactly what transpired.
The nail in Zimmerman's coffin comes before anything popped off.
The Neighborhood Watchman testified THAT THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO CARRY FIRE ARMS
Now, being a CCW holder myself I know the laws surrounding this.
You can take your guns anywhere accept Schools, Federal Buildings, National Parks, and places were alcohol is primarily sold for consumption.
HOWEVER, ANY PRIVATE ENTITY CAN PROHIBIT FIREARMS, and YOU HAVE TO COMPLY, because you no longer have the LEGAL RIGHT TO BE THERE WITH THE FIREARM
Example, if I worked as a security guard a grocery store and had a CCW
but my boss told fire arms are not allowed at work.
I would not be able to keep my weapon with while at work, I'd have to leave it in my car.
If I were to violate that, and get caught with my weapon, I WOULD BE CHARGED WITH ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF A FIREARM, because I've been told firearms are banned from the workplace.
Zimmerman was never suppose to have a gun on him in the first place.
And we all know his bytch ass would have never followed Trayvon if he didn't have a weapon on him.
So before the confrontation Zimmerman is wrong and has broken the law.
This is what needs to be made clear, not trying to twist around the talking points of the defense.
Zimmerman, a man who has assaulted a police officer, beat up his ex-girlfriend, is clearly someone who should not be allowed to handle a weapon, because he is violent person incapable of rational thought.
A rational person armed with weapon would have never been in this situation in the first place.
Have CCW is a double edge sword, shyt can get you locked up more ways than it can save your life.
Zimmerman's legal right to be there most be challenged
everything else is irrelevant, because it is all speculation and theory
Neighborhood Watch coordinated
instructed them all not to follow people not to engage people and not carry weapons
HE DISOBEYED ALL OF THOSE just like a FELON DOES, they break laws
George Zimmerman is a felon, who got a clean slate because of his daddy
this has to be made clear. He is the criminal PROTECTED by his father his entire life not Trayvon who's done nothing but be a normal teeanger
